Cited by 79Data Quality and ManagementMedical Coding and Health InformationElectronic Health Records Systems

Data linkage infrastructure for cross-jurisdictional health-related research in Australia

Open access
Boyd, James H, Ferrante, Anna M, O’Keefe, Christine M, Bass, Alfred J, Randall, Sean M, Semmens, James B·2012·BMC Health Services Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Centre for Data Linkage (CDL) has been established to enable national and cross-jurisdictional health-related research in Australia. It has been funded through the Population Health Research Network (PHRN), a national initiative established under the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS). This paper describes the development of the processes and methodology required to create cross-jurisdictional research infrastructure and enable aggregation of State and Territory linkages into a single linkage "map". METHODS: The CDL has implemented a linkage model which incorporates best practice in data linkage and adheres to data integration principles set down by the Australian Government. Working closely with data custodians and State-based data linkage facilities, the CDL has designed and implemented a linkage system to enable research at national or cross-jurisdictional level. A secure operational environment has also been established with strong governance arrangements to maximise privacy and the confidentiality of data. RESULTS: The development and implementation of a cross-jurisdictional linkage model overcomes a number of challenges associated with the federated nature of health data collections in Australia. The infrastructure expands Australia's data linkage capability and provides opportunities for population-level research. The CDL linkage model, infrastructure architecture and governance arrangements are presented. The quality and capability of the new infrastructure is demonstrated through the conduct of data linkage for the first PHRN Proof of Concept Collaboration project, where more than 25 million records were successfully linked to a very high quality. CONCLUSIONS: This infrastructure provides researchers and policy-makers with the ability to undertake linkage-based research that extends across jurisdictional boundaries. It represents an advance in Australia's national data linkage capabilities and sets the scene for stronger government-research collaboration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1472-6963-12-480

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Goldacre M, Glover J The value of linked data for policy development, strategic planning, clinical practice and public health: An international perspective. Symposium on Health Data Linkage 2003 Adelaide University: Public Health Information Development Unit
  2. Gill LE OX-LINK The Oxford Medical Record Linkage System Record Linkage Techniques 1997 Oxford: University of Oxford p. 19

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boyd, J. H., Ferrante, A. M., O’Keefe, C. M., Bass, A. J., Randall, S. M., & Semmens, J. B.
Affiliations
  • Curtin University (AU)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • Menzies Institute for Medical Research (AU)
Corresponding author
Boyd, James H
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2012-12
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
480-480
ISSN
1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049856698
Cited by
79
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5
FWCI
8.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Australian Government
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Data Quality and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
data linkage, health data infrastructure, data integration, data governance, data privacy and confidentiality, linkage quality, Australia
MeSH terms
Australia, Confidentiality, Health Services Research, Humans, Medical Record Linkage, Policy Making, Software, State Medicine, Computer Security, Benchmarking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review