The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hospital survey on patient safety culture in China
Open accessAbstract
Background: Patient safety culture is an important measure in assessing the quality of health care. There is a growing recognition of the need to establish a culture of hospital focused on patient safety. This study explores the attitudes and perceptions of patient safety culture for health care workers in China by using a Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC) questionnaire and comparing it with the psychometric properties of an adapted translation of the HSPSC in Chinese hospitals with that of the US. Method: We used the modified HSPSC questionnaire to measure 10 dimensions of patient safety culture from 32 hospitals in 15 cities all across China. The questionnaire included 1160 Chinese health-care workers who consisted of predominately internal physicians and nurses. We used SPSS 17.0 and Microsoft Excel 2007 to conduct the statistical analysis on survey data including descriptive statistics and validity and reliability of survey. All data was input and checked by two investigators independently. Result: A total of 1500 questionnaires were distributed of which 1160 were responded validly (response rate 77%). The positive response rate for each item ranged from 36% to 89%. The positive response rate on 5 dimensions (Teamwork Within Units, Organization Learning-Continuous Improvement, Communication Openness, Non-punitive Response and Teamwork Across Units) was higher than that of AHRQ data (P < 0.05). There was a statistical difference on the perception of patient safety culture in groups of different work units, positions and qualification levels. The internal consistency of the total survey was comparatively satisfied (Cronbach’s α = 0.84). Conclusion: The results show that amongst the health care workers surveyed in China there was a positive attitude towards the patient safety culture within their organizations. The differences between China and the US in patient safety culture suggests that cultural uniqueness should be taken into consideration whenever safety culture measurement tools are applied in different culture settings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Aiken, L. H., Sermeus, W., Van den Heede, K., Sloane, D. M., Busse, R., McKee, M., Bruyneel, L., Rafferty, A. M., Griffiths, P., Moreno-Casbas, M. T., et al. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e1717 · Cited by 2,052
Manzoor, F., Wei, L., Hussain, A., Asif, M., & Shah, S. I. A. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16183318 · Cited by 406
Reis, C. T., Paiva, S. G., & Sousa, P. (2018) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzy080 · Cited by 258
Hospital Staff Nurses' Shift Length Associated With Safety and Quality of Care
Stimpfel, A. W., & Aiken, L. H. (2013) · Journal of Nursing Care Quality · doi:10.1097/ncq.0b013e3182725f09 · Cited by 120
Rathert, C., Williams, E. S., Lawrence, E. R., & Halbesleben, J. R. B. (2012) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.02.011 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Nie, Y., Mao, X., Cui, H., He, S., Li, J., & Zhang, M.
- Venue
- BMC Health Services Research
- Published
- 2013-06-24
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 228-228
- ISSN
- 1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970588955
- Cited by
- 421
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 83.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hospital survey on patient safety culture in China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1472-6963-13-228
- The paper
- Nie, Y., Mao, X., Cui, H., He, S., Li, J., & Zhang, M. (2013). Hospital survey on patient safety culture in China. BMC Health Services Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-228
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.