Cited by 11Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementHealth Policy Implementation ScienceClinical practice guidelines implementation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Developing a complex intervention for the outpatient management of incidentally diagnosed pulmonary embolism in cancer patients

Open access
Palmer, June, Bozas, George, Stephens, Andrew, Johnson, Miriam, Avery, Ged, O’Toole, Lorcan, Maraveyas, Anthony·2013·BMC Health Services Research

Abstract

Background: Most patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) spend 5–7 days in hospital even though only 4.5% will develop serious complications during this time. In particular, the group of patients with incidentally diagnosed PE (i-PE) includes many patients with low risk features potentially ideal for outpatient management; however the evidence for their optimal management is lacking hence relative practices may vary considerably. We describe the development process, components, links and function of a nurse-led service for the management of patients with i-PE, developed in accordance to the UK Medical Research Council complex intervention guidance. Methods: Phase 0 (Theoretical underpinning): The Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) was selected for patient risk assessment and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guideline for the management of PE in cancer patients (2007) was selected as quality measure. Historical registry and audit data from our centre regarding i-PE incidence and management for the period between 2006 and 2009 illustrating the then current practices were reviewed. Phase 1 (Modelling): Modelling of the pathway included the following: a) Identification of training needs, planning and implementation of training schemes and development of transferable competencies and training materials. b) Mapping patient pathways and flow and c) Production of key documentation and Standard Operating Procedures for the delivery of the service. Results: Phase 2 (Implementation and testing of the intervention): During the initial 12 months of implementation, remedial action was taken to address identified deficiencies regarding patient referral to the pathway, compliance with treatment protocol, patient follow up, selection challenges from the use of PESI in cancer patients and challenges regarding the “first-pass” identification of i-PE. Conclusion: We have developed and piloted a complex intervention to manage cancer patients with incidental PE in an outpatient setting. Adherence to evidence- based care, improvement of communication between professionals and patients, and improved quality of data is demonstrated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1472-6963-13-235

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Department_of_Health: The NHS improvement plan putting people at the heart of public services. (Cm 6268). 2004, London: STO Publishing

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Palmer, J., Bozas, G., Stephens, A., Johnson, M., Avery, G., O’Toole, L., & Maraveyas, A.
Affiliations
  • Castle Hill Hospital (GB)
  • University of Hull (GB)
Corresponding author
Bozas, George
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2013-06-27
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
235-235
ISSN
1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054662655
Cited by
11
References
30
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
cancer patients, outpatient management, nurse-led services, complex intervention development, Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index, care pathways, standard operating procedures, employee training, quality of care
MeSH terms
Ambulatory Care, Humans, Neoplasms, Pulmonary Embolism, Registries, Risk Assessment, Critical Pathways, Incidental Findings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review