Cited by 94Pressure Ulcer Prevention and ManagementGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesWound Healing and Treatments

Pressure ulcer multidisciplinary teams via telemedicine: a pragmatic cluster randomized stepped wedge trial in long term care

Open access
Stern, Anita, Mitsakakis, Nicholas, Paulden, Mike, Alibhai, Shabbir, Wong, Josephine, Tomlinson, George, Brooker, Ann-Sylvia, Krahn, Murray +1 more·2014·BMC Health Services Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The study was conducted to determine the clinical and cost effectiveness of enhanced multi-disciplinary teams (EMDTs) vs. 'usual care' for the treatment of pressure ulcers in long term care (LTC) facilities in Ontario, Canada METHODS: We conducted a multi-method study: a pragmatic cluster randomized stepped-wedge trial, ethnographic observation and in-depth interviews, and an economic evaluation. Long term care facilities (clusters) were randomly allocated to start dates of the intervention. An advance practice nurse (APN) with expertise in skin and wound care visited intervention facilities to educate staff on pressure ulcer prevention and treatment, supported by an off-site hospital based expert multi-disciplinary wound care team via email, telephone, or video link as needed. The primary outcome was rate of reduction in pressure ulcer surface area (cm2/day) measured on before and after standard photographs by an assessor blinded to facility allocation. Secondary outcomes were time to healing, probability of healing, pressure ulcer incidence, pressure ulcer prevalence, wound pain, hospitalization, emergency department visits, utility, and cost. RESULTS: 12 of 15 eligible LTC facilities were randomly selected to participate and randomized to start date of the intervention following the stepped wedge design. 137 residents with a total of 259 pressure ulcers (stage 2 or greater) were recruited over the 17 month study period. No statistically significant differences were found between control and intervention periods on any of the primary or secondary outcomes. The economic evaluation demonstrated a mean reduction in direct care costs of $650 per resident compared to 'usual care'. The qualitative study suggested that onsite support by APN wound specialists was welcomed, and is responsible for reduced costs through discontinuation of expensive non evidence based treatments. Insufficient allocation of nursing home staff time to wound care may explain the lack of impact on healing. CONCLUSION: Enhanced multi-disciplinary wound care teams were cost effective, with most benefit through cost reduction initiated by APNs, but did not improve the treatment of pressure ulcers in nursing homes. Policy makers should consider the potential yield of strengthening evidence based primary care within LTC facilities, through outreach by APNs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01232764.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1472-6963-14-83

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More complex telewoundcare management situations, such as pressure ulcers involving multiple carers, have been shown to be comparable with conventional practice.

    “More complex telewoundcare management situations, such as pressure ulcers involving multiple carers, have also been shown to be comparable with conventional practice [30].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Adobe Photoshop http://downloads.phpnuke.org/en/c113045/adobe-photoshop-cs5-free-download-full-review/ [accessed July 13th, 2013]
  2. Stern A Krahn MD Alibhai SMH Baker GR Brooker AS Chadwick S Fierheller M Harris C Hon J Juanxi Li C Jeffs LP Kowgier M Levin L McLaren AM Mitsakakis N Norton L Parslow N Paulden M Pham B Reeves S Santos J Teague L Tomlinson G Vidmar M Witteman W Woo K Woodbury G Wong J Zwarenstein MF Canadian Patient Safety Institute (CPSI) Final Report 2013 To be published on the CPSI website post journal publication. http://www.patientsafetyinstitute.ca/English/research/cpsiResearchCompetitions/2009/Pages/Stern.aspx

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stern, A., Mitsakakis, N., Paulden, M., Alibhai, S., Wong, J., Tomlinson, G., Brooker, A.-S., Krahn, M., & Zwarenstein, M.
Affiliations
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Toronto General Hospital (CA)
  • Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
Stern, Anita
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2014-02-24
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
83-83
ISSN
1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007166182
Cited by
94
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2
FWCI
19.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Patient Safety Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
Keywords
pressure ulcers, telemedicine, long-term care facilities, nursing homes, advanced practice nurses, pressure ulcer prevention, wound healing, cost-effectiveness
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Pressure Ulcer, Female, Health Services Research, Hospitalization, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Ontario, Patient Care Team, Wound Healing, Incidence, Prevalence, Cluster Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review