Cited by 14Higher Education Governance and DevelopmentHealth and Medical EducationAfrican Education and Politics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Building partnerships towards strengthening Makerere University College of Health Sciences: a stakeholder and sustainability analysis

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Partnerships and networking are important for an institution of higher learning like Makerere University College of Health Sciences (MakCHS) to be competitive and sustainable. METHODS: A stakeholder and sustainability analysis of 25 key informant interviews was conducted among past, current and potential stakeholders of MakCHS to obtain their perspectives and contributions to sustainability of the College in its role to improve health outcomes. RESULTS: The College has multiple internal and external stakeholders. Stakeholders from Uganda wanted the College to use its enormous academic capacity to fulfil its vision, take initiative, and be innovative in conducting more research and training relevant to the country's health needs. Many stakeholders felt that the initiative for collaboration currently came more from the stakeholders than the College. External stakeholders felt that MakCHS was insufficiently marketing itself and not directly engaging the private sector or Parliament. Stakeholders also identified the opportunity for MakCHS to embrace information technology in research, learning and training, and many also wanted MakCHS to start leadership and management training programmes in health systems. The need for MakCHS to be more vigorous in training to enhance professionalism and ethical conduct was also identified. DISCUSSION: As a constituent of a public university, MakCHS has relied on public funding, which has been inadequate to fulfill its mission. Broader networking, marketing to mobilize resources, and providing strong leadership and management support to inspire confidence among its current and potential stakeholders will be essential to MakCHS' further growth. MakCHS' relevance is hinged on generating research knowledge for solving the country's contemporary health problems and starting relevant programs and embracing technologies. It should share new knowledge widely through publications and other forms of dissemination. Whether institutional leadership is best in the hands of academicians or professional managers is a debatable matter. CONCLUSIONS: This study points towards the need for MakCHS and other African public universities to build a broad network of partnerships to strengthen their operations, relevance, and sustainability. Conducting stakeholder and sustainability analyses are instructive toward this end, and have provided information and perspectives on how to make long-range informed choices for success.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1472-698x-11-s1-s14

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The literature shows sustainability is enhanced by following a traditional process extending from needs and readiness assessment, through piloting and change management, to evaluation.

    “Similarly, the literature shows sustainability to be enhanced by following a traditional process extending from needs and readiness assessment, through piloting and change management, to evaluation, although the rise of ‘spontaneous telemedicine’ offers an alternative route particularly for developing countries.”

    From Barriers and opportunities to implementation of sustainable e-Health programmes in Uganda: A literature review (2017) · cites this paper as [92]

    The Methods and Results > Sustainability sections discuss stakeholder analysis and the resources needed to sustain Makerere University College of Health Sciences. Searches for needs and readiness assessment, piloting, change management, evaluation, and telemedicine found no passage describing the claimed process or saying it enhances sustainability. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The rise of 'spontaneous telemedicine' offers an alternative route particularly for developing countries.

    “although the rise of ‘spontaneous telemedicine’ offers an alternative route particularly for developing countries.”

    From Barriers and opportunities to implementation of sustainable e-Health programmes in Uganda: A literature review (2017) · cites this paper as [92]

    The Background discusses partnerships among African health and higher-education institutions, and the Results > Sustainability mentions embracing ICT for research, management, and education. Searches for “spontaneous telemedicine” and “telemedicine alternative route developing countries” found no passage addressing telemedicine or the claimed alternative route. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. UNICEF: Health policies and Strategies, Sustainability, Integration and National Capacity Building. E/ICEF/1992/L.2. 1992, New York: UNICEF

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Okui, O., Ayebare, E., Chalo, R. N., Pariyo, G. W., Groves, S., & Peters, D. H.
Affiliations
  • Makerere University (UG)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Okui, Olico
Venue
BMC International Health and Human Rights
Published
2011-03-09
Volume
11
Issue
S1
Pages
S14-S14
ISSN
1472-698X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071764879
Cited by
13
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
8.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC International Health and Human Rights (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • Johns Hopkins University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Governance and Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › African Education and Politics
Keywords
Makerere University College of Health Sciences, institutional partnerships, stakeholder analysis, institutional sustainability, higher education institutions, health sciences education, public university funding, institutional marketing, private sector participation, health research capacity, knowledge dissemination, Uganda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review