Cited by 98Malaria Research and ControlGlobal Maternal and Child HealthPoverty, Education, and Child Welfare

Ownership and usage of mosquito nets after four years of large-scale free distribution in Papua New Guinea

Open access
Hetzel, Manuel W, Gideon, Gibson, Lote, Namarola, Makita, Leo, Siba, Peter M, Mueller, Ivo·2012·Malaria Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Papua New Guinea (PNG) is a highly malaria endemic country in the South-West Pacific with a population of approximately 6.6 million (2009). In 2004, the country intensified its malaria control activities with support from the Global Fund. With the aim of achieving 80% ownership and usage, a country-wide campaign distributed two million free long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs). METHODS: In order to evaluate outcomes of the campaign against programme targets, a country-wide household survey based on stratified multi-stage random sampling was carried out in 17 of the 20 provinces after the campaign in 2008/09. In addition, a before-after assessment was carried out in six purposively selected sentinel sites. A structured questionnaire was administered to the heads of sampled households to elicit net ownership and usage information. RESULTS: After the campaign, 64.6% of households owned a LLIN, 80.1% any type of mosquito net. Overall usage by household members amounted to 32.5% for LLINs and 44.3% for nets in general. Amongst children under five years, 39.5% used a LLIN and 51.8% any type of net, whereas 41.3% of pregnant women used a LLIN and 56.1% any net. Accessibility of villages was the key determinant of net ownership, while usage was mainly determined by ownership. Most (99.5%) of the household members who did not sleep under a net did not have access to a (unused) net in their household. In the sentinel sites, LLIN ownership increased from 9.4% to 88.7%, ownership of any net from 52.7% to 94.1%. Usage of LLINs increased from 5.5% to 55.1%, usage of any net from 37.3% to 66.7%. Among children under five years, usage of LLINs and of nets in general increased from 8.2% to 67.0% and from 44.6% to 76.1%, respectively (all p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: While a single round of free distribution of LLINs significantly increased net ownership, an insufficient number of nets coupled with a heterogeneous distribution led to overall low usage rates. Programme targets were missed mainly as a result of the distribution mechanism itself and operational constraints in this very challenging setting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1475-2875-11-192

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. StataCorp LP Survey Data Reference Manual: Release 10 2007 Stata Press, College Station, TX

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hetzel, M. W., Gideon, G., Lote, N., Makita, L., Siba, P. M., & Mueller, I.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research (PG)
  • National Department of Health (PG)
Corresponding author
Hetzel, Manuel W
Venue
Malaria Journal
Published
2012-06-10
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
192-192
ISSN
1475-2875 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055077703
Cited by
98
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Malaria Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Keywords
long-lasting insecticidal nets, malaria control, Papua New Guinea, children under five, pregnant women, operational constraints, Global Fund, sentinel sites, household surveys
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Services Research, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Mosquito Control, Ownership, Papua New Guinea, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Young Adult, Mosquito Nets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review