Cited by 93Malaria Research and ControlGlobal Maternal and Child HealthPharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting

Feasibility and acceptability of home-based management of malaria strategy adapted to Sudan's conditions using artemisinin-based combination therapy and rapid diagnostic test

Open access
Elmardi, Khalid A, Malik, Elfatih M, Abdelgadir, Tarig, Ali, Salah H, Elsyed, Abdalla H, Mudather, Mahmoud A, Elhassan, Asma H, Adam, Ishag·2009·Malaria Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Malaria remains a major public health problem especially in sub-Saharan Africa. Despite the efforts exerted to provide effective anti-malarial drugs, still some communities suffer from getting access to these services due to many barriers. This research aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of home-based management of malaria (HMM) strategy using artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) for treatment and rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for diagnosis. METHODS: This is a study conducted in 20 villages in Um Adara area, South Kordofan state, Sudan. Two-thirds (66%) of the study community were seeking treatment from heath facilities, which were more than 5 km far from their villages with marked inaccessibility during rainy season. Volunteers (one per village) were trained on using RDTs for diagnosis and artesunate plus sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine for treating malaria patients, as well as referral of severe and non-malaria cases. A system for supply and monitoring was established based on the rural health centre, which acted as a link between the volunteers and the health system. Advocacy for the policy was done through different tools. Volunteers worked on non-monetary incentives but only a consultation fee of One Sudanese Pound (equivalent to US$0.5).Pre- and post-intervention assessment was done using household survey, focus group discussion with the community leaders, structured interview with the volunteers, and records and reports analysis. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The overall adherence of volunteers to the project protocol in treating and referring cases was accepted that was only one of the 20 volunteers did not comply with the study guidelines. Although the use of RDTs seemed to have improved the level of accuracy and trust in the diagnosis, 30% of volunteers did not rely on the negative RDT results when treating fever cases. Almost all (94.7%) the volunteers felt that they were satisfied with the spiritual outcome of their new tasks. As well, volunteers have initiated advocacy campaigns supported by their village health committees which were found to have a positive role to play in the project that proved their acceptability of the HMM design. The planned system for supply was found to be effective. The project was found to improve the accessibility to ACTs from 25% to 64.7% and the treatment seeking behaviour from 83.3% to 100% before- and after the HMM implementation respectively. CONCLUSION: The evaluation of the project identified the feasibility of the planned model in Sudan's condition. Moreover, the communities as well as the volunteers found to be satisfied with and supportive to the system and the outcome. The problem of treating other febrile cases when diagnosis is not malaria and other non-fever cases needs to be addressed as well.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1475-2875-8-39

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elmardi, K. A., Malik, E. M., Abdelgadir, T., Ali, S. H., Elsyed, A. H., Mudather, M. A., Elhassan, A. H., & Adam, I.
Affiliations
  • Federal Ministry of Health (SD)
  • University of Khartoum (SD)
Corresponding author
Elmardi, Khalid A
Venue
Malaria Journal
Published
2009-03-09
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
39-39
ISSN
1475-2875 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003891519
Cited by
93
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 12
FWCI
11.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Malaria Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Greater South Information System
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
Keywords
artemisinin-based combination therapy, rapid diagnostic tests, malaria treatment, malaria diagnosis, community volunteers, treatment-seeking behavior, health care access, health advocacy, non-monetary incentives, South Kordofan, Sudan, feasibility and acceptability, rural health care
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Animals, Antimalarials, Community Health Workers, Community-Institutional Relations, Drug Combinations, Drug Therapy, Combination, Feasibility Studies, Female, Fever, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Compliance, Plasmodium falciparum, Pyrimethamine, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sudan, Sulfadoxine, Volunteers, Malaria, Falciparum, Artemisinins, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review