The assessment of developmental status using the ages and stages questionnaire-3 in nutritional research in north Indian young children
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE AND BACKGROUND: For large epidemiological studies in low and middle-income countries, inexpensive and easily administered developmental assessment tools are called for. This report evaluates the feasibility of the assessment tool Ages and Stages Questionnaire 3.edition (ASQ-3) "home procedure" in a field trial in 422 North Indian young children. METHODS: ASQ-3 was translated and adjusted for a North Indian Hindi setting. Three examiners were trained by a clinical psychologist to perform the assessments. During the main study, ten % of the assessments were done by two examiners to estimate inter-observer agreement. During all sessions, the examiners recorded whether the scoring was based on observation of the skill during the session, or on caregiver's report of the child's skill. Intra class correlation coefficient was calculated to estimate the agreement between the raters and between the raters and a gold standard. Pearson product moment correlation coefficient and standardized alphas were calculated to measure internal consistency. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Inter-observer agreement was strong both during training exercises and during the main study. In the Motor subscales and the Problem Solving subscale most items could be observed during the session. The standardized alphas for the total ASQ-3 scale across all ages were strong, while the alpha values for the different subscales and age levels varied. The correlations between the total score and the subscale scores were consistently strong, while the correlations between subscale scores were moderate. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We found that the translated and adjusted ASQ-3 "home procedure" was a feasible procedure for the collection of reliable data on the developmental status in infants and young children. Examiners were effectively trained over a short period of time, and the total ASQ scores showed adequate variability. However, further adjustments are needed to obtain satisfying alpha values in all subscales, and to ensure variability in all items when transferred to a North Indian cultural context.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ASQ-3 is designed to be answered by caregivers but can also be assessed directly with the child by a trained professional.
“The ASQ-3 is designed to be answered by caregivers but can also be assessed directly with the child by a trained professional (29), as we did in this study.”
From Vitamin B-12 status in infancy is positively associated with development and cognitive functioning 5 y later in Nepalese children (2017) · cites this paper as [29]
ASQ-3 has been previously used in several studies in low- and middle-income countries.
“ASQ-3 has been previously used in several studies in low-and middleincome countries (29,41,42)”
From Vitamin B-12 status in infancy is positively associated with development and cognitive functioning 5 y later in Nepalese children (2017) · cites this paper as [29]
The psychometric qualities of ASQ-3 in this study were comparable to studies performed in similar settings.
“the psychometric qualities of ASQ-3 in this study were comparable to studies performed in similar settings (29).”
From Vitamin B-12 status in infancy is positively associated with development and cognitive functioning 5 y later in Nepalese children (2017) · cites this paper as [29]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 44
- Authors
- Kvestad, I., Taneja, S., Kumar, T., Bhandari, N., Strand, T. A., & Hysing, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Bergen (NO)
- Society for Applied Studies (IN)
- Innlandet Hospital Trust (NO)
- Uni Research (Norway) (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Strand, Tor A
- Venue
- Nutrition Journal
- Published
- 2013-04-23
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 50-50
- ISSN
- 1475-2891 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3637815
- OpenAlex
- W2169101939
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 3.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nutrition Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
- Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Keywords
- developmental assessment, interobserver agreement, reliability statistics, internal consistency, Hindi translation, young children, infants, caregiver reports, North India, low- and middle-income countries
- MeSH terms
- Child Development, Developmental Disabilities, Child, Preschool, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, India, Infant, Male, Mass Screening, Surveys and Questionnaires, Socioeconomic Factors, Translating, Observer Variation, Nutrition Assessment, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Databases, Factual
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review