Cardio-respiratory outcomes associated with exposure to wildfire smoke are modified by measures of community health
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Characterizing factors which determine susceptibility to air pollution is an important step in understanding the distribution of risk in a population and is critical for setting appropriate policies. We evaluate general and specific measures of community health as modifiers of risk for asthma and congestive heart failure following an episode of acute exposure to wildfire smoke. METHODS: A population-based study of emergency department visits and daily concentrations of fine particulate matter during a wildfire in North Carolina was performed. Determinants of community health defined by County Health Rankings were evaluated as modifiers of the relative risk. A total of 40 mostly rural counties were included in the study. These rankings measure factors influencing health: health behaviors, access and quality of clinical care, social and economic factors, and physical environment, as well as, the outcomes of health: premature mortality and morbidity. Pollutant concentrations were obtained from a mathematically modeled smoke forecasting system. Estimates of relative risk for emergency department visits were based on Poisson mixed effects regression models applied to daily visit counts. RESULTS: For asthma, the strongest association was observed at lag day 0 with excess relative risk of 66% (28,117). For congestive heart failure the excess relative risk was 42% (5,93). The largest difference in risk was observed after stratifying on the basis of Socio-Economic Factors. Difference in risk between bottom and top ranked counties by Socio-Economic Factors was 85% and 124% for asthma and congestive heart failure respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that Socio-Economic Factors should be considered as modifying risk factors in air pollution studies and be evaluated in the assessment of air pollution impacts.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is considerable difference in the quality of health/environment and healthcare across different populations in Brazil, which is an important determinant of the health impacts of wildfire-related air pollution.
“where there is a considerable difference in the quality of health/environment and healthcare across different populations (influencing health/environment equity in negative ways), which is an important determinant of the health impacts of wildfire-related air pollution20”
From Health impacts of wildfire-related air pollution in Brazil: a nationwide study of more than 2 million hospital admissions between 2008 and 2018 (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
The Background and Discussion say community health and socioeconomic conditions can modify health risks from wildfire-smoke exposure. But the Methods place the study in North Carolina, not Brazil, and the Discussion says access and quality of care were not observed to determine susceptibility at the community level. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredA portion of the regional heterogeneity in the impact of wildfire PM2.5 exposure can be explained by cultural, social, behavioral, and environmental/geographical conditions.
“A portion of the regional heterogeneity of the impact of wildfire PM2.5 exposure indicated by our results can be explained by the cultural, social, behavioral, and environmental/geographical conditions10,20,24.”
From Health impacts of wildfire-related air pollution in Brazil: a nationwide study of more than 2 million hospital admissions between 2008 and 2018 (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
The Results report that wildfire-smoke PM2.5 risks differed between North Carolina counties grouped by socioeconomic and physical-environment measures, and the Discussion identifies socioeconomic factors as the strongest modifiers. This supports a role for social and environmental conditions in differing impacts, but the paper does not establish cultural or geographical conditions as explanations; its Discussion also cautions that county-level associations cannot establish individual-level causes. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- Apelberg BJ Buckley TJ White RH Socioeconomic and racial disparities in cancer risk from air toxics in maryland Environ Health Perspect 2005 113 693 699 10.1289/ehp.7609 15929891 PMC1257593 · DOI
- Morello-Frosch R Pastor M Jr Porras C Sadd J Environmental justice and regional inequality in southern california: implications for future research Environ Health Perspect 2002 110 Suppl 2 149 154 11929723 PMC1241158
- Brown P Race, class, and environmental health: a review and systematization of the literature Environ Res 1995 69 15 30 10.1006/enrs.1995.1021 7588491 · DOI
- Molitor J Su JG Molitor NT Rubio VG Richardson S Hastie D Morello-Frosch R Jerrett M Identifying vulnerable populations through an examination of the association between multipollutant profiles and poverty Environ Sci Technol 2011 45 7754 7760 10.1021/es104017x 21797252 · DOI
- Schneider A Neas LM Graff DW Herbst MC Cascio WE Schmitt MT Buse JB Peters A Devlin RB Association of cardiac and vascular changes with ambient pm2.5 in diabetic individuals Part Fibre Toxicol 2010 7 14 10.1186/1743-8977-7-14 20525188 PMC2896918 · DOI
- Forastiere F Stafoggia M Tasco C Picciotto S Agabiti N Cesaroni G Perucci CA Socioeconomic status, particulate air pollution, and daily mortality: differential exposure or differential susceptibility Am J Ind Med 2007 50 208 216 10.1002/ajim.20368 16847936 · DOI
- O'Neill MS Veves A Zanobetti A Sarnat JA Gold DR Economides PA Horton ES Schwartz J Diabetes enhances vulnerability to particulate air pollution-associated impairment in vascular reactivity and endothelial function Circulation 2005 111 2913 2920 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.517110 15927967 · DOI
- Gwynn RC Thurston GD The burden of air pollution: impacts among racial minorities Environ Health Perspect 2001 109 Suppl 4 501 506 11544154 PMC1240572
- Bilheimer LT Evaluating metrics to improve population health Prev Chronic Dis 2010 7 A69 20550827 PMC2901567
- Rappold AG Stone SL Cascio WE Neas LM Kilaru VJ Carraway MS Szykman JJ Ising A Cleve WE Meredith JT Vaughan-Batten H Deyneka L Devlin RB Peat bog wildfire smoke exposure in rural north carolina is associated with cardiopulmonary emergency department visits assessed through syndromic surveillance Environ Health Perspect 2011 119 1415 1420 10.1289/ehp.1003206 21705297 PMC3230437 · DOI
- Wellenius GA Bateson TF Mittleman MA Schwartz J Particulate air pollution and the rate of hospitalization for congestive heart failure among medicare beneficiaries in pittsburgh, pennsylvania Am J Epidemiol 2005 161 1030 1036 10.1093/aje/kwi135 15901623 PMC1563499 · DOI
- O'Neill MS Veves A Sarnat JA Zanobetti A Gold DR Economides PA Horton ES Schwartz J Air pollution and inflammation in type 2 diabetes: a mechanism for susceptibility Occup Environ Med 2007 64 373 379 17182639 PMC2078522
- North Carolina disease event tracking and Epidemiologic Collection Tool (nc detect) http://www.ncdetect.org/. 19133850
- Rolph GD Draxler RR Stein AF Taylor A Ruminski MG Kondragunta S Zeng J Huang HC Manikin G Mcqueen JT Davidson PM Description and verification of the noaa smoke forecasting system: the 2007 fire season Weather Forecast 2009 24 361 378 10.1175/2008WAF2222165.1 · DOI
- Delfino RJ Brummel S Wu J Stern H Ostro B Lipsett M Winer A Street DH Zhang L Tjoa T Gillen DL The relationship of respiratory and cardiovascular hospital admissions to the Southern California wildfires of 2003 Occup Environ Med 2009 66 189 197 10.1136/oem.2008.041376 19017694 PMC4176821 · DOI
- Duclos P Lipset M The 1987 forest fire disaster in california: assessment of emergency room visits Anrch Environ Health 1990 45 53 58 10.1080/00039896.1990.9935925 2180383 · DOI
- Muennig P Fiscella K Tancredi D Franks P The relative health burden of selected social and behavioral risk factors in the United States: implications for policy Am J Public Health 2010 100 1758 1764 10.2105/AJPH.2009.165019 20019300 PMC2920959 · DOI
- Wen M Browning CR Cagney KA Poverty, affluence, and income inequality: neighborhood economic structure and its implications for health Soc Sci Med 2003 57 843 860 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00457-4 12850110 · DOI
- Brunner E Stress and the biology of inequality BMJ 1997 314 1472 1476 10.1136/bmj.314.7092.1472 9167568 PMC2126744 · DOI
- Marmot MG Bosma H Hemingway H Brunner E Stansfeld S Contribution of job control and other risk factors to social variations in coronary heart disease incidence Lancet 1997 350 235 239 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)04244-X 9242799 · DOI · Paper page
- Schwartz J Bellinger D Glass T Exploring potential sources of differential vulnerability and susceptibility in risk from environmental hazards to expand the scope of risk assessment Am J Public Health 2011 101 S94 S101 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300272 22021315 PMC3222466 · DOI
- Schwartz J Bellinger D Glass T Expanding the scope of environmental risk assessment to better include differential vulnerability and susceptibility Am J Public Health 2011 101 S88 S93 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300268 22021314 PMC3222479 · DOI
- Schwartz J Bellinger D Glass T Expanding the scope of risk assessment: methods of studying differential vulnerability and susceptibility Am J Public Health 2011 101 S102 S109 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300367 22021313 PMC3222483 · DOI
- Subramanian SV Kawachi I The association between state income inequality and worse health is not confounded by race Int J Epidemiol 2003 32 1022 1028 10.1093/ije/dyg245 14681268 · DOI
- Bell ML Dominici F Effect modification by community characteristics on the short-term effects of ozone exposure and mortality in 98 US communities Am J Epidemiol 2008 167 986 997 10.1093/aje/kwm396 18303005 PMC2430754 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A systematic review of the physical health impacts from non-occupational exposure to wildfire smoke
Liu, J. C., Pereira, G., Uhl, S. A., Bravo, M. A., & Bell, M. L. (2015) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2014.10.015 · Cited by 685 · see citing works
Wildland fire smoke and human health
Cascio, W. E. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.086 · Cited by 642 · see citing works
Self-citationReid, C. E., Jerrett, M., Tager, I. B., Petersen, M. L., Mann, J. K., & Balmes, J. R. (2016) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2016.06.012 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
The costs and losses of wildfires: a literature survey
Thomas, D., Butry, D., Gilbert, S., Webb, D., & Fung, J. (2017) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.1215 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Hutchinson, J. A., Vargo, J., Milet, M., French, N. H. F., Billmire, M., Johnson, J., & Hoshiko, S. (2018) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002601 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Liu, J. C., Wilson, A., Mickley, L. J., Ebisu, K., Sulprizio, M. P., Wang, Y., Peng, R. D., Yue, X., Dominici, F., & Bell, M. L. (2017) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwx141 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Requia, W. J., Amini, H., Mukherjee, R., Gold, D. R., & Schwartz, J. D. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26822-7 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rappold, A. G., Cascio, W. E., Kilaru, V. J., Stone, S. L., Neas, L. M., Devlin, R. B., & Diaz-Sanchez, D.
- Affiliations
- Environmental Protection Agency (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rappold, Ana G
- Venue
- Environmental Health
- Published
- 2012-09-24
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-71
- ISSN
- 1476-069X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3506568
- OpenAlex
- W2155331441
- Cited by
- 157
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 4.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Environmental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
- Keywords
- wildfire smoke, PM2.5, asthma, congestive heart failure, community health, County Health Rankings, socioeconomic factors, air pollution susceptibility, emergency department visits, rural counties, North Carolina
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Air Pollutants, Air Pollution, Asthma, Emergency Service, Hospital, Fires, Health Services Accessibility, Heart Failure, Humans, Middle Aged, North Carolina, Risk, Rural Population, Smoke, Socioeconomic Factors, Health Behavior, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review