Cited by 81Global Cancer Incidence and ScreeningMedical Coding and Health InformationData Quality and Management

Estimating the accuracy of geographical imputation

Open access
Henry, Kevin A, Boscoe, Francis P·2008·International Journal of Health Geographics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To reduce the number of non-geocoded cases researchers and organizations sometimes include cases geocoded to postal code centroids along with cases geocoded with the greater precision of a full street address. Some analysts then use the postal code to assign information to the cases from finer-level geographies such as a census tract. Assignment is commonly completed using either a postal centroid or by a geographical imputation method which assigns a location by using both the demographic characteristics of the case and the population characteristics of the postal delivery area. To date no systematic evaluation of geographical imputation methods ("geo-imputation") has been completed. The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of census tract assignment using geo-imputation. METHODS: Using a large dataset of breast, prostate and colorectal cancer cases reported to the New Jersey Cancer Registry, we determined how often cases were assigned to the correct census tract using alternate strategies of demographic based geo-imputation, and using assignments obtained from postal code centroids. Assignment accuracy was measured by comparing the tract assigned with the tract originally identified from the full street address. RESULTS: Assigning cases to census tracts using the race/ethnicity population distribution within a postal code resulted in more correctly assigned cases than when using postal code centroids. The addition of age characteristics increased the match rates even further. Match rates were highly dependent on both the geographic distribution of race/ethnicity groups and population density. CONCLUSION: Geo-imputation appears to offer some advantages and no serious drawbacks as compared with the alternative of assigning cases to census tracts based on postal code centroids. For a specific analysis, researchers will still need to consider the potential impact of geocoding quality on their results and evaluate the possibility that it might introduce geographical bias.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1476-072x-7-3

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most of these studies examined methods for imputing race/ethnicity data, although several looked at imputing geocoded patient addresses, and one looked at imputing occupational data.

    “Most of these studies examined methods for imputing race/ethnicity data, although several looked at imputing geocoded patient addresses,67,69,70 and one looked at imputing occupational data.61”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

12 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Whitsel EA Quibrera PM Smith RL Catellier DJ Liao D Henley AC Heiss G Accuracy of commercial geocoding: assessment and implications Epidemiol Perspect Innov 2006 3 8 16857050 10.1186/1742-5573-3-8 PMC1557664 · DOI
  2. Cayo MR Talbot TO Positional error in automated geocoding of residential addresses Int J Health Geogr 2003 2 10 14687425 10.1186/1476-072X-2-10 PMC324564 · DOI
  3. Havener LA Hultstrom D Standards for Cancer Registries: Data Standards and Data Dictionary, Volume II 2007 11th Edition Springfield IL, North American Association of Central Cancer Registries
  4. Donders AR van der Heijden GJ Stijnen T Moons KG Review: a gentle introduction to imputation of missing values J Clin Epidemiol 2006 59 1087 1091 16980149 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.01.014 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Sheehan JT DeChello LM Kulldorff M Gregorio DI Gershman S Mroszczyk M The geographic distribution of breast cancer incidence in Massachusetts 1988 to 1997, adjusted for covariates Int J Health Geogr 2004 3 17 15291960 10.1186/1476-072X-3-17 PMC514716 · DOI
  6. Klassen AC Kulldorff M Curriero F Geographical clustering of prostate cancer grade and stage at diagnosis, before and after adjustment for risk factors Int J Health Geogr 2005 4 1 15649329 10.1186/1476-072X-4-1 PMC546220 · DOI
  7. SAS 9th edition. SAS Institute Cary, NC

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Henry, K. A., & Boscoe, F. P.
Affiliations
  • New Jersey Department of Health (US)
  • New York State Department of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Henry, Kevin A
Venue
International Journal of Health Geographics
Published
2008
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
3
ISSN
1476-072X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009389340
Cited by
81
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • International Journal of Health Geographics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • TUScholarShare (Temple University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01pc54405-9-0-0)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (HHSN261200544005C)
  • National Cancer Institute (HHSN261200544005C, N01-PC-54405, N01 PC054405)
  • National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (U58/DP000808)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Data Quality and Management
Keywords
geocoding, cancer registry data, breast cancer, prostate cancer, colorectal cancer, population density, geographic bias
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Demography, Female, Geography, Humans, Male, New Jersey, Population Density, Prostatic Neoplasms, Registries, Socioeconomic Factors, Colorectal Neoplasms, Topography, Medical, Geographic Information Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review