Cited by 176Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive Health and TechnologiesReproductive Biology and Fertility

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relationship amongst teratozoospermia, seminal oxidative stress and male infertility

Open access
Agarwal, Ashok, Tvrda, Eva, Sharma, Rakesh·2014·Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spermatozoa morphology is an important and complex characteristic of the fertilization capacity of male germ cells. Morphological abnormalities have been observed to be accompanied by reactive oxygen species (ROS) overproduction and further damage to spermatozoa, ultimately leading to infertility. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the relationship between seminal ROS production and sperm morphology in infertile teratozoospermic patients as well as in healthy men of proven and unproven fertility. METHODS: Semen samples were collected from 79 patients classified as teratozoospermic and 56 healthy donors (control). Standard semen analysis was performed and spermatozoa morphology was assessed according to the WHO 2010 guidelines. Seminal ROS was measured by chemiluminescence assay. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated, and sensitivity, specificity, cutoff value and area under curve (AUC) were determined. RESULTS: Sperm morphology was significantly poor in the Teratozoospermic Group compared with the 3 Donor Groups (P < 0.05). Significantly higher levels of ROS (RLU/sec/10⁶ sperm) were seen in the Teratozoospermic group (145.4 (41.5; 555.4) compared to the Donor Groups: All Donors (64.8 (21.1; 198.2), Proven Donors (58.8 (14.2; 79.2) and Proven Donors < 2 years (58.8 (14.2; 79.2) (P < 0.05). ROS correlated negatively with sperm concentration in the All Donor group (r = -0.354; P = 0.021) as well as in the Teratozospermic group (r -0.356; P = 0.002). Using ROC analysis, we established the cutoff values for concentration, morphology and ROS. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of teratozoospermia may be directly related to the overproduction of seminal ROS. Therefore, besides sperm concentration and motility, spermatozoa morphology should receive an equally important consideration in the overall assessment of male fertility.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1477-7827-12-45

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves for ROS in (A) All Donors; (B) Proven Donors and (C) Proven Donors < 2 years fertility vs. Teratozoospermia group. ROC curves shows the area under the curve for ROS production in Patients with teratozoospermia when compared to All Donors, Proven Donors, and Proven Donors who had initiated pregnancy in the last two years.
Figure 1 Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves for ROS in (A) All Donors; (B) Proven Donors and (C) Proven Donors < 2 years fertility vs. Teratozoospermia group. ROC curves shows the area under the curve for ROS production in Patients with teratozoospermia when compared to All Donors, Proven Donors, and Proven Donors who had initiated pregnancy in the last two years.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1056/NEJMoa003005 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 176

Metadata

Authors
Agarwal, A., Tvrda, E., & Sharma, R.
Affiliations
Cleveland Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Agarwal, Ashok
Venue
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
Published
2014
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
45
ISSN
1477-7827 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129147752
Cited by
176
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 5
FWCI
20.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
teratozoospermia, seminal oxidative stress, reactive oxygen species, male infertility, sperm morphology, sperm concentration, sperm motility, semen analysis, chemiluminescence, cut-off values
MeSH terms
Adult, Fertility, Humans, Infertility, Male, Male, Ohio, ROC Curve, Semen, Sensitivity and Specificity, Spermatozoa, Tissue Donors, Biomarkers, Up-Regulation, Reactive Oxygen Species, Oxidative Stress, Cell Shape, Semen Analysis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review