Cited by 1,336Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive Health and TechnologiesMale Reproductive Health Studies

Sperm Morphology, Motility, and Concentration in Fertile and Infertile Men

Open access
Guzick, David S., Overstreet, James W., Factor-Litvak, Pam, Brazil, Charlene K., Nakajima, Steven T., Coutifaris, Christos, Carson, Sandra Ann, Cisneros, Pauline +4 more·2001·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Background Although semen analysis is routinely used to evaluate the male partner in infertile couples, sperm measurements that discriminate between fertile and infertile men are not well defined. Methods We evaluated two semen specimens from each of the male partners in 765 infertile couples and 696 fertile couples at nine sites. The female partners in the infertile couples had normal results on fertility evaluation. The sperm concentration and motility were determined at the sites; semen smears were stained at the sites and shipped to a central laboratory for an assessment of morphologic features of sperm with the use of strict criteria. We used classification-and-regression-tree analysis to estimate threshold values for subfertility and fertility with respect to the sperm concentration, motility, and morphology. We also used an analysis of receiver-operating-characteristic curves to assess the relative value of these sperm measurements in discriminating between fertile and infertile men. Results The subfertile ranges were a sperm concentration of less than 13.5 x 10(6) per milliliter, less than 32 percent of sperm with motility, and less than 9 percent with normal morphologic features. The fertile ranges were a concentration of more than 48.0 x 10(6) per milliliter, greater than 63 percent motility, and greater than 12 percent normal morphologic features. Values between these ranges indicated indeterminate fertility. There was extensive overlap between the fertile and the…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa003005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Semen analysis is the most basic evaluation of male infertility, and evaluation of semen parameters is currently based on the standards defined in the WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen.

    “Semen analysis (SA) represents the most basic evaluation of male infertility. The evaluation of semen parameters is currently based on the standards defined in the laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen created by the World Health Organization (WHO) [8,9,10].”
  • Sperm morphology is correlated with the chances of natural pregnancy in epidemiological studies comparing fertile men whose partners achieved natural pregnancy and infertile men.

    “Epidemiological studies comparing fertile men whose partners achieved natural pregnancy and infertile men have demonstrated that sperm morphology was correlated with the chances of natural pregnancy [1, 2, 3].”
  • The predictive value of sperm parameters for detecting infertility is low.

    “In these studies, although correlations were observed between morphology and natural fertility, the predictive value of sperm parameters for detecting infertility was low.”
  • Publications examining the impact of morphology on spontaneous pregnancy, intrauterine insemination, and in vitro fertilization reach varying conclusions.

    “Despite efforts to standardize methodology for grading sperm morphology, publications examining the impact morphology on spontaneous pregnancy, intrauterine insemination, and in vitro fertilization reach varying conclusions (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guzick, D. S., Overstreet, J. W., Factor-Litvak, P., Brazil, C. K., Nakajima, S. T., Coutifaris, C., Carson, S. A., Cisneros, P., Steinkampf, M. P., Hill, J. A., Xu, D., & Vogel, D. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2001-11-08
Volume
345
Issue
19
Pages
1388-1393
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W1997352429
Cited by
1,336
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 70 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 83 · 2012: 74
FWCI
26.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5u10hd033173-02, 5u01hd027006-07, 5u10hd027009-11, 1u10hd026975-01, 5u10hd026981-10)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U10HD033172, U10HD27049, U10 HD33173, U10 HD27001, U10 HD27009, U01-HD 27006, U10 HD26975, U10HD027049, U10 HD33172, U10-HD26981)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
Keywords
male infertility, sperm morphology, sperm motility, sperm concentration, semen analysis, subfertility, classification and regression trees, receiver operating characteristic, infertile couples
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Educational Status, Humans, Infertility, Male, Male, Reference Values, Regression Analysis, ROC Curve, Semen, Sensitivity and Specificity, Smoking, Sperm Count, Sperm Motility, Spermatozoa, Odds Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review