Cited by 41Health Policy Implementation ScienceHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsGlobal Maternal and Child Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Supervision of community peer counsellors for infant feeding in South Africa: an exploratory qualitative study

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent years have seen a re-emergence of community health worker (CHW) interventions, especially in relation to HIV care, and in increasing coverage of child health interventions. Such programmes can be particularly appealing in the face of human resource shortages and fragmented health systems. However, do we know enough about how these interventions function in order to support the investment? While research based on strong quantitative study designs such as randomised controlled trials increasingly document their impact, there has been less empirical analysis of the internal mechanisms through which CHW interventions succeed or fail. Qualitative process evaluations can help fill this gap. METHODS: This qualitative paper reports on the experience of three CHW supervisors who were responsible for supporting infant feeding peer counsellors. The intervention took place in three diverse settings in South Africa. Each setting employed one CHW supervisor, each of whom was individually interviewed for this study. The study forms part of the process evaluation of a large-scale randomized controlled trial of infant feeding peer counselling support. RESULTS: Our findings highlight the complexities of supervising and supporting CHWs. In order to facilitate effective infant feeding peer counselling, supervisors in this study had to move beyond mere technical management of the intervention to broader people management. While their capacity to achieve this was based on their own prior experience, it was enhanced through being supported themselves. In turn, resource limitations and concerns over safety and being in a rural setting were raised as some of the challenges to supervision. Adding to the complexity was the issue of HIV. Supervisors not only had to support CHWs in their attempts to offer peer counselling to mothers who were potentially HIV positive, but they also had to deal with supporting HIV-positive peer counsellors. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the need to pay attention to the experiences of supervisors so as to better understand the components of supervision in the field. Such understanding can enhance future policy making, planning and implementation of peer community health worker programmes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1478-4491-8-6

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Lehmann U, Sanders D: Community health workers: What do we know about them? The state of the evidence on programmes, activities, costs and impact on health outcomes of using community health workers. 2007, Geneva: Evidence and Information for Policy, Department of Human Resources for Health, World Health Organisation
  2. Chopra M, Jackson D, Doherty T, Colvin M: Good Start Community-Based Intervention Study: Ethics Application. 2006, Medical Research Council, University of the Western Cape & Centre for AIDS Development Research and Evaluation
  3. Tylleskär T, Chopra M, Diallo H, Doherty T, Ekström E-C, Engebretsen IM, Goga A, Jackson D, Kankasa C, Klungsøyr J: PROMISE Final Scientific Report:- Preliminary results from the multi-centre cluster-randomised behaviour intervention trial PROMISE EBF: exclusive breastfeeding promotion in Sub-Saharan Africa. 2009, University of Bergen
  4. Department of Health SA: Community Health Worker Policy Framework. Pretoria. 2005
  5. Sarafino EP: Health Psychology: Biospsychosocial Interactions. 1994, New York: John Wiley & Sons
  6. Marais H: A plague of inequality. Mail &Guardian. 2006

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Daniels, K., Nor, B., Jackson, D., Ekström, E.-C., & Doherty, T.
Affiliations
  • South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • University of the Western Cape (ZA)
Corresponding author
Daniels, Karen
Venue
Human Resources for Health
Published
2010-03-30
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
6-6
ISSN
1478-4491 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996988234
Cited by
41
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Resources for Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
Keywords
community health workers, peer counseling, infant feeding, supervision, personnel management, HIV, resource constraints, rural health, process evaluation, South Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review