The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and prognosis in cardiac amyloidosis
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiac involvement is common in amyloidosis and associated with a variably adverse outcome. We have previously shown that cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can assess deposition of amyloid protein in the myocardial interstitium. In this study we assessed the prognostic value of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and gadolinium kinetics in cardiac amyloidosis in a prospective longitudinal study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The pre-defined study end point was all-cause mortality. We prospectively followed a cohort of 29 patients with proven cardiac amyloidosis. All patients underwent biopsy, 2D-echocardiography and Doppler studies, 123I-SAP scintigraphy, serum NT pro BNP assay, and CMR with a T1 mapping method and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). RESULTS: Patients with were followed for a median of 623 days (IQ range 221, 1436), during which 17 (58%) patients died. The presence of myocardial LGE by itself was not a significant predictor of mortality. However, death was predicted by gadolinium kinetics, with the 2 minute post-gadolinium intramyocardial T1 difference between subepicardium and subendocardium predicting mortality with 85% accuracy at a threshold value of 23 ms (the lower the difference the worse the prognosis). Intramyocardial T1 gradient was a better predictor of survival than FLC response to chemotherapy (Kaplan Meier analysis P = 0.049) or diastolic function (Kaplan-Meier analysis P = 0.205). CONCLUSION: In cardiac amyloidosis, CMR provides unique information relating to risk of mortality based on gadolinium kinetics which reflects the severity of the cardiac amyloid burden.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Targeted pharmacological depletion of serum amyloid P component for treatment of human amyloidosis
Pepys, M. B., Herbert, J., Hutchinson, W. L., Tennent, G. A., Lachmann, H. J., Gallimore, J. R., Lovat, L. B., Bartfai, T., Alanine, A., Hertel, C., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/417254a · Cited by 540
Self-citation
Cited by
Transthyretin (TTR) Cardiac Amyloidosis
Ruberg, F. L., & Berk, J. L. (2012) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.111.078915 · Cited by 708
Noncontrast T1 Mapping for the Diagnosis of Cardiac Amyloidosis
Karamitsos, T. D., Piechnik, S. K., Banypersad, S. M., Fontana, M., Ntusi, N. B., Ferreira, V. M., Whelan, C. J., Myerson, S. G., Robson, M. D., Hawkins, P. N., et al. (2013) · JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.11.013 · Cited by 676
Self-citationHow to Image Cardiac Amyloidosis
Dorbala, S., Cuddy, S., & Falk, R. H. (2020) · JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.07.015 · Cited by 308
Stirrat, J., & White, J. A. (2013) · Canadian Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2012.11.033 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Maceira, A. M., Prasad, S. K., Hawkins, P. N., Roughton, M., & Pennell, D. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 54
- ISSN
- 1097-6647 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127128200
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and prognosis in cardiac amyloidosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1532-429x-10-54
- The paper
- Maceira, A. M., Prasad, S. K., Hawkins, P. N., Roughton, M., & Pennell, D. J. (2008). Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and prognosis in cardiac amyloidosis. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429x-10-54
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.