Cited by 143Advanced oxidation water treatmentLandfill Environmental Impact StudiesSubcritical and Supercritical Water Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The study of leachate treatment by using three advanced oxidation process based wet air oxidation

Open access
Karimi, Behroz, Ehrampoush, Mohammad Hassan, Ebrahimi, Asghar, Mokhtari, Mehdi·2013·Iranian Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering

Abstract

Wet air oxidation is regarded as appropriate options for wastewater treatment with average organic compounds. The general purpose of this research is to determine the efficiency of three wet air oxidation methods, wet oxidation with hydrogen peroxide and absorption with activated carbon in removing organic matter and nitrogenous compounds from Isfahan's urban leachate. A leachate sample with the volume of 1.5 liters entered into a steel reactor with the volume of three liters and was put under a 10-bar pressure, at temperatures of 100, 200, and 300° as well as three retention times of 30, 60, and 90 minutes. The sample was placed at 18 stages of leachate storage ponds in Isfahan Compost Plant with the volume of 20 liters, using three WPO, WAO methods and a combination of WAO/GAC for leachate pre-treatment. Thirty percent of pure oxygen and hydrogen peroxide were applied as oxidation agents. The COD removal efficiency in WAO method is 7.8-33.3%, in BOD is 14.7-50.6%, the maximum removal percentage (efficiency) for NH 4-N is 53.3% and for NO 3-N is 56.4-73.9%. The removal efficiency of COD and BOD 5 is 4.6%-34 and 24%-50 respectively in WPO method. Adding GAC to the reactor, the removal efficiency of all parameters was improved. The maximum removal efficiency was increased 48% for COD, 31%-43.6 for BOD 5 by a combinational method, and the ratio of BOD 5/COD was also increased to 90%. In this paper, WAO and WPO process was used for Leachate pre-treatment and WAO/GAC combinational process was applied for improving the organic matter removal and leachate treatment; it was also determined that the recent process is much more efficient in removing resistant organic matter.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1735-2746-10-1

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Wet peroxide oxidation reactor system.
Figure 1 Wet peroxide oxidation reactor system.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 The comparison of the removal efficiency of three methods WAO, WPO and WAO/GAC in COD removal.
Figure 2 The comparison of the removal efficiency of three methods WAO, WPO and WAO/GAC in COD removal.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 The comparison of the removal efficiency of three methods WAO, WPO and WAO/GAC in BOD removal.
Figure 3 The comparison of the removal efficiency of three methods WAO, WPO and WAO/GAC in BOD removal.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 The comparison of the removal efficiency of three methods WAO, WPO and WAO/GAC in NH3removal.
Figure 4 The comparison of the removal efficiency of three methods WAO, WPO and WAO/GAC in NH3removal.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Jing G, Luan M, Chen T: Wet peroxide oxidation of oilfield sludge. Arabian J Chem. 2011, In press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 143

Metadata

Authors
Karimi, B., Ehrampoush, M. H., Ebrahimi, A., & Mokhtari, M.
Affiliations
  • Arak University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services (IR)
  • Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Ehrampoush, Mohammad Hassan
Venue
Iranian Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering
Published
2013-01-02
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
1-1
ISSN
  • 1735-1979 (ISSN-L)
  • 1735-2746
OpenAlex
W2152599637
Cited by
143
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4
FWCI
12.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Advanced oxidation water treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Subcritical and Supercritical Water Processes
Keywords
leachate treatment, wet oxidation, wet peroxide oxidation, activated carbon adsorption, hydrogen peroxide, advanced oxidation processes, organic matter removal, nitrogen removal, COD removal, BOD removal, leachate pretreatment, Isfahan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The study of leachate treatment by using three advanced oxidation process based wet air oxidation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1735-2746-10-1
The paper
Karimi, B., Ehrampoush, M. H., Ebrahimi, A., & Mokhtari, M. (2013). The study of leachate treatment by using three advanced oxidation process based wet air oxidation. Iranian Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1186/1735-2746-10-1