The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mapping the human membrane proteome: a majority of the human membrane proteins can be classified according to function and evolutionary origin
Open accessAbstract
Background: Membrane proteins form key nodes in mediating the cell's interaction with the surroundings, which is one of the main reasons why the majority of drug targets are membrane proteins. Results: Here we mined the human proteome and identified the membrane proteome subset using three prediction tools for alpha-helices: Phobius, TMHMM, and SOSUI. This dataset was reduced to a non-redundant set by aligning it to the human genome and then clustered with our own interactive implementation of the ISODATA algorithm. The genes were classified and each protein group was manually curated, virtually evaluating each sequence of the clusters, applying systematic comparisons with a range of databases and other resources. We identified 6,718 human membrane proteins and classified the majority of them into 234 families of which 151 belong to the three major functional groups: receptors (63 groups, 1,352 members), transporters (89 groups, 817 members) or enzymes (7 groups, 533 members). Also, 74 miscellaneous groups with 697 members were determined. Interestingly, we find that 41% of the membrane proteins are singlets with no apparent affiliation or identity to any human protein family. Our results identify major differences between the human membrane proteome and the ones in unicellular organisms and we also show a strong bias towards certain membrane topologies for different functional classes: 77% of all transporters have more than six helices while 60% of proteins with an enzymatic function and 88% receptors, that are not GPCRs, have only one single membrane spanning α-helix. Further, we have identified and characterized new gene families and novel members of existing families. Conclusion: Here we present the most detailed roadmap of gene numbers and families to our knowledge, which is an important step towards an overall classification of the entire human proteome. We estimate that 27% of the total human proteome are alpha-helical transmembrane proteins and provide an extended classification together with in-depth investigations of the membrane proteome's functional, structural, and evolutionary features.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206
Needleman, S. B., & Wunsch, C. D. (1970) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(70)90057-4 · Cited by 11,288
<tt>BLAT</tt> —The <tt>BLAST</tt> -Like Alignment Tool
Kent, W. J. (2002) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.229202 · Cited by 8,480
Distinguishing protein-coding and noncoding genes in the human genome
Clamp, M., Fry, B., Kamal, M., Xie, X., Cuff, J., Lin, M. F., Kellis, M., Lindblad-Toh, K., & Lander, E. S. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0709013104 · Cited by 624
Cited by
On the Distribution of Protein Refractive Index Increments
Zhao, H., Brown, P. H., & Schuck, P. (2011) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2011.03.004 · Cited by 517
The in silico human surfaceome
Bausch-Fluck, D., Goldmann, U., Müller, S., van Oostrum, M., Müller, M., Schubert, O. T., & Wollscheid, B. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1808790115 · Cited by 369
Structural determinants and functional consequences of protein affinity for membrane rafts
Lorent, J. H., Diaz-Rohrer, B., Lin, X., Spring, K., Gorfe, A. A., Levental, K. R., & Levental, I. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01328-3 · Cited by 283
Rask-Andersen, M., Masuram, S., & Schiöth, H. B. (2014) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-011613-135943 · Cited by 282
Self-citationKrishnan, A., Almén, M. S., Fredriksson, R., & Schiöth, H. B. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029817 · Cited by 204
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Almén, M. S., Nordström, K. J., Fredriksson, R., & Schiöth, H. B.
- Venue
- BMC Biology
- Published
- 2009-08-13
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 50-50
- ISSN
- 1741-7007 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072470496
- Cited by
- 611
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 6.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mapping the human membrane proteome: a majority of the human membrane proteins can be classified according to function and evolutionary origin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1741-7007-7-50
- The paper
- Almén, M. S., Nordström, K. J., Fredriksson, R., & Schiöth, H. B. (2009). Mapping the human membrane proteome: a majority of the human membrane proteins can be classified according to function and evolutionary origin. BMC Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-7-50
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.