Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 369

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Simulation of an SEIR infectious disease model on the dynamic contact network of conference attendees

Open access
Stehlé, Juliette, Voirin, Nicolas, Barrat, Alain, Cattuto, Ciro, Colizza, Vittoria, Isella, Lorenzo, Régis, Corinne, Pinton, Jean-François, Khanafer, Nagham, Van den Broeck, Wouter, Vanhems, Philippe·2011·BMC Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The spread of infectious diseases crucially depends on the pattern of contacts between individuals. Knowledge of these patterns is thus essential to inform models and computational efforts. However, there are few empirical studies available that provide estimates of the number and duration of contacts between social groups. Moreover, their space and time resolutions are limited, so that data are not explicit at the person-to-person level, and the dynamic nature of the contacts is disregarded. In this study, we aimed to assess the role of data-driven dynamic contact patterns between individuals, and in particular of their temporal aspects, in shaping the spread of a simulated epidemic in the population. METHODS: We considered high-resolution data about face-to-face interactions between the attendees at a conference, obtained from the deployment of an infrastructure based on radiofrequency identification (RFID) devices that assessed mutual face-to-face proximity. The spread of epidemics along these interactions was simulated using an SEIR (Susceptible, Exposed, Infectious, Recovered) model, using both the dynamic network of contacts defined by the collected data, and two aggregated versions of such networks, to assess the role of the data temporal aspects. RESULTS: We show that, on the timescales considered, an aggregated network taking into account the daily duration of contacts is a good approximation to the full resolution network, whereas a homogeneous representation that retains only the topology of the contact network fails to reproduce the size of the epidemic. CONCLUSIONS: These results have important implications for understanding the level of detail needed to correctly inform computational models for the study and management of real epidemics. Please see related article BMC Medicine, 2011, 9:88.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1741-7015-9-87

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Cited by

See all 369

Metadata

Authors
Stehlé, J., Voirin, N., Barrat, A., Cattuto, C., Colizza, V., Isella, L., Régis, C., Pinton, J.-F., Khanafer, N., Van den Broeck, W., & Vanhems, P.
Venue
BMC Medicine
Published
2011-07-19
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
87-87
ISSN
1741-7015 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154416797
Cited by
369
References
46
FWCI
29.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simulation of an SEIR infectious disease model on the dynamic contact network of conference attendees. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1741-7015-9-87
The paper
Stehlé, J., Voirin, N., Barrat, A., Cattuto, C., Colizza, V., Isella, L., Régis, C., Pinton, J.-F., Khanafer, N., Van den Broeck, W., & Vanhems, P. (2011). Simulation of an SEIR infectious disease model on the dynamic contact network of conference attendees. BMC Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-9-87

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.