Cited by 3,365Computational and Text Analysis MethodsMulti-Agent Systems and NegotiationOpinion Dynamics and Social Influence

Computational social science

Open access
Lazer, David, Pentland, Alex, Adamic, Lada, Aral, Sinan, Barabási, Albert-László, Brewer, Devon, Christakis, Nicholas, Contractor, Noshir +7 more·2009·Science

Abstract

A field is emerging that leverages the capacity to collect and analyze data at a scale that may reveal patterns of individual and group behaviors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1167742

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The emergence of Computational Social Science (CSS) marks a transformative shift in the study of social phenomena, triggered by advancements in computational technology and large-scale collection of digital behavioral trace data.

    “The emergence of Computational Social Science (CSS) marks a transformative shift in the study of social phenomena, triggered by advancements in computational technology and large-scale collection of (digital) behavioral trace data.”

    From Computational Social Science of Social Cohesion and Polarization (2026) · cites this paper as Lazer et al. 2009

    In “Life in the network” and “From individuals to societies” (page not provided), the paper links emerging computational social science to new technologies and large-scale digital records of behavior. It describes a transformation in understanding as a potential outcome, however, and says barriers may limit progress; the claim presents the shift more definitively than the source does. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The new millennium has witnessed the Computational Social Science (CSS) revolution.

    “The new millennium has witnessed the Computational Social Science (CSS) revolution (Lazer et al. 2009;Conte et al. 2012;Lazer et al. 2020).”

    From Computational Social Science of Social Cohesion and Polarization (2026) · cites this paper as Lazer et al. 2009

    In “The coming age of computational social science,” the paper says computational social science is emerging and occurring on a large scale in some organizations. But it describes its emergence in academic social science as slow and much of its transformative potential as prospective, rather than saying a CSS revolution had already occurred. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Social media platforms are increasingly used to gather information about societal issues and breaking news developments.

    “Social media platforms are increasingly being used as a tool for gathering information about, for example, societal issues (Lazer et al. 2009), and to find out about the latest developments during breaking news stories (Phuvipadawat and Murata 2010).”

    From Detection and Resolution of Rumours in Social Media (2019) · cites this paper as Lazer et al. 2009

  • The social web enables access to social traces at a scale and level of detail, both in breadth and depth, impractical with conventional data collection techniques, like surveys or user studies.

    “The social web enables access to social traces at a scale and level of detail, both in breadth and depth, impractical with conventional data collection techniques, like surveys or user studies (Richardson, 2008; Lazer et al., 2009).”

    From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Lazer et al., 2009

  • Digital trace data-from social media posts to behavioral logs-provide an empirical foundation for tracking the evolution of social alignments at scale.

    “Digital trace data-from social media posts to behavioral logs-provide an empirical foundation for tracking the evolution of social alignments at scale (Lazer et al. 2009).”

    From Computational Social Science of Social Cohesion and Polarization (2026) · cites this paper as Lazer et al. 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [4]Aral S Van Alstyne M 2007 Network Structure & Information Advantage Proceedings of the Academy of Management Conference Philadelphia, PA
  2. [19]National Research Council Myron P 2007 Putting People on the Map: Protecting Confidentiality with Linked Social-Spatial Data Gutmann and Paul Stern Washington National Academy Press
  3. [22]Backstrom L Dwork C Kleinberg J 2007 Wherefore Art Thou R3579X? Anonymized Social Networks, Hidden Patterns, and Structural Steganography Proc. 16th Intl. World Wide Web Conference

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lazer, D., Pentland, A., Adamic, L., Aral, S., Barabási, A.-L., Brewer, D., Christakis, N., Contractor, N., Fowler, J., Gutmann, M., Jebara, T., King, G., Macy, M., Roy, D., & Van Alstyne, M.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Interdisciplinary Scientific Research (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Venue
Science
Published
2009-02-06
Volume
323
Issue
5915
Pages
721-723
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2159397589
Cited by
3,365
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 158 · 2025: 135 · 2024: 122 · 2023: 174 · 2022: 160 · 2021: 220 · 2020: 280 · 2019: 248 · 2018: 236 · 2017: 256 · 2016: 231 · 2015: 274 · 2014: 263 · 2013: 221 · 2012: 158
FWCI
691.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (P01AG031093)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01HD045753)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
Keywords
computational social science, large-scale data collection, data analysis, individual and group behavior, behavioral patterns
MeSH terms
Data Collection, Group Processes, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Research, Social Behavior, Social Sciences, Privacy, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review