The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effects of neighborhood density and street connectivity on walking behavior: the Twin Cities walking study
Open accessAbstract
A growing body of health and policy research suggests residential neighborhood density and street connectivity affect walking and total physical activity, both of which are important risk factors for obesity and related chronic diseases. The authors report results from their methodologically novel Twin Cities Walking Study; a multilevel study which examined the relationship between built environments, walking behavior and total physical activity. In order to maximize neighborhood-level variation while maintaining the exchangeability of resident-subjects, investigators sampled 716 adult persons nested in 36 randomly selected neighborhoods across four strata defined on density and street-connectivity – a matched sampling design. Outcome measures include two types of self-reported walking (from surveys and diaries) and so-called objective 7-day accelerometry measures. While crude differences are evident across all outcomes, adjusted effects show increased odds of travel walking in higher-density areas and increased odds of leisure walking in low-connectivity areas, but neither density nor street connectivity are meaningfully related to overall mean miles walked per day or increased total physical activity. Contrary to prior research, the authors conclude that the effects of density and block size on total walking and physical activity are modest to non-existent, if not contrapositive to hypotheses. Divergent findings are attributed to this study's sampling design, which tends to mitigate residual confounding by socioeconomic status.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures
Tiebout, C. M. (1956) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/257839 · Cited by 13,222
Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer
FREEDSON, P. S., MELANSON, E., & SIRARD, J. (1998) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-199805000-00021 · Cited by 3,825
Cited by
Built environments and obesity in disadvantaged populations.
Lovasi, G. S., Hutson, M. A., Guerra, M., & Neckerman, K. M. (2009) · Epidemiologic Reviews · doi:10.1093/epirev/mxp005 · Cited by 820
Rook, G. A. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1313731110 · Cited by 760
Does Residential Density Increase Walking and Other Physical Activity?
Forsyth, A., Oakes, J. M., Schmitz, K. H., & Hearst, M. (2007) · Urban Studies · doi:10.1080/00420980601184729 · Cited by 349
Self-citationMesser, L. C., Oakes, J. M., & Mason, S. (2010) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwp435 · Cited by 161
Self-citationHou, N., Popkin, B. M., Jacobs Jr., D. R., Song, Y., Guilkey, D., Lewis, C. E., & Gordon-Larsen, P. (2010) · Health & Place · doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.08.005 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Oakes, J. M., Forsyth, A., & Schmitz, K. H.
- Venue
- Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-16
- ISSN
- 1742-5573 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1963833765
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effects of neighborhood density and street connectivity on walking behavior: the Twin Cities walking study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1742-5573-4-16
- The paper
- Oakes, J. M., Forsyth, A., & Schmitz, K. H. (2007). The effects of neighborhood density and street connectivity on walking behavior: the Twin Cities walking study. Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-5573-4-16
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.