The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gait analysis methods in rehabilitation
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Brand's four reasons for clinical tests and his analysis of the characteristics of valid biomechanical tests for use in orthopaedics are taken as a basis for determining what methodologies are required for gait analysis in a clinical rehabilitation context. Measurement methods in clinical gait analysis: The state of the art of optical systems capable of measuring the positions of retro-reflective markers placed on the skin is sufficiently advanced that they are probably no longer a significant source of error in clinical gait analysis. Determining the anthropometry of the subject and compensating for soft tissue movement in relation to the under-lying bones are now the principal problems. Techniques for using functional tests to determine joint centres and axes of rotation are starting to be used successfully. Probably the last great challenge for optical systems is in using computational techniques to compensate for soft tissue measurements. In the long term future it is possible that direct imaging of bones and joints in three dimensions (using MRI or fluoroscopy) may replace marker based systems. Methods for interpreting gait analysis data: There is still not an accepted general theory of why we walk the way we do. In the absence of this, many explanations of walking address the mechanisms by which specific movements are achieved by particular muscles. A whole new methodology is developing to determine the functions of individual muscles. This needs further development and validation. A particular requirement is for subject specific models incorporating 3-dimensional imaging data of the musculo-skeletal anatomy with kinematic and kinetic data. Methods for understanding the effects of intervention: Clinical gait analysis is extremely limited if it does not allow clinicians to choose between alternative possible interventions or to predict outcomes. This can be achieved either by rigorously planned clinical trials or using theoretical models. The evidence base is generally poor partly because of the limited number of prospective clinical trials that have been completed and more such studies are essential. Very recent work has started to show the potential of using models of the mechanisms by which people with pathology walk in order to simulate different potential interventions. The development of these models offers considerable promise for new clinical applications of gait analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking
Kadaba, M. P., Ramakrishnan, H. K., & Wootten, M. E. (1990) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research · doi:10.1002/jor.1100080310 · Cited by 3,216
Validation of a functional method for the estimation of hip joint centre location
Leardini, A., Cappozzo, A., Catani, F., Toksvig-Larsen, S., Petitto, A., Sforza, V., Cassanelli, G., & Giannini, S. (1999) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(98)00148-1 · Cited by 415
Cited by
Wade, L., Needham, L., McGuigan, P., & Bilzon, J. (2022) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.12995 · Cited by 384
Inertial Measurement Units for Clinical Movement Analysis: Reliability and Concurrent Validity
Al-Amri, M., Nicholas, K., Button, K., Sparkes, V., Sheeran, L., & Davies, J. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18030719 · Cited by 318
Hulleck, A. A., Menoth Mohan, D., Abdallah, N., El Rich, M., & Khalaf, K. (2022) · Frontiers in Medical Technology · doi:10.3389/fmedt.2022.901331 · Cited by 281
Celik, Y., Stuart, S., Woo, W., Sejdic, E., & Godfrey, A. (2022) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.09.016 · Cited by 83
Lebel, K., Boissy, P., Nguyen, H., & Duval, C. (2017) · BioMedical Engineering OnLine · doi:10.1186/s12938-017-0347-6 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Baker, R.
- Venue
- Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
- Published
- 2006-03-02
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-4
- ISSN
- 1743-0003 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1823431077
- Cited by
- 587
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gait analysis methods in rehabilitation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1743-0003-3-4
- The paper
- Baker, R. (2006). Gait analysis methods in rehabilitation. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-3-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.