The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Study of stability of time-domain features for electromyographic pattern recognition
Open accessAbstract
Background: Significant progress has been made towards the clinical application of human-machine interfaces (HMIs) based on electromyographic (EMG) pattern recognition for various rehabilitation purposes. Making this technology practical and available to patients with motor deficits requires overcoming real-world challenges, such as physical and physiological changes, that result in variations in EMG signals and systems that are unreliable for long-term use. In this study, we aimed to address these challenges by (1) investigating the stability of time-domain EMG features during changes in the EMG signals and (2) identifying the feature sets that would provide the most robust EMG pattern recognition. Methods: Variations in EMG signals were introduced during physical experiments. We identified three disturbances that commonly affect EMG signals: EMG electrode location shift, variation in muscle contraction effort, and muscle fatigue. The impact of these disturbances on individual features and combined feature sets was quantified by changes in classification performance. The robustness of feature sets was evaluated by a stability index developed in this study. Results: Muscle fatigue had the smallest effect on the studied EMG features, while electrode location shift and varying effort level significantly reduced the classification accuracy for most of the features. Under these disturbances, the most stable EMG feature set with combination of four features produced at least 16.0% higher classification accuracy than the least stable set. EMG autoregression coefficients and cepstrum coefficients showed the most robust classification performance of all studied time-domain features. Conclusions: Selecting appropriate EMG feature combinations can overcome the impact of the studied disturbances on EMG pattern classification to a certain extent; however, this simple solution is still inadequate. Stabilizing electrode contact locations and developing effective classifier training strategies are suggested to further improve the robustness of HMIs based on EMG pattern recognition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control
Englehart, K., & Hudgins, B. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2003.813539 · Cited by 1,743
Control of Multifunctional Prosthetic Hands by Processing the Electromyographic Signal
Zecca, M., Micera, S., Carrozza, M. C., & Dario, P. (2002) · Critical Reviews? in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v30.i456.80 · Cited by 606
EMG feature evaluation for movement control of upper extremity prostheses
Zardoshti-Kermani, M., Wheeler, B. C., Badie, K., & Hashemi, R. M. (1995) · IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/86.481972 · Cited by 477
Decoding a New Neural–Machine Interface for Control of Artificial Limbs
Zhou, P., Lowery, M. M., Englehart, K. B., Huang, H., Li, G., Hargrove, L., Dewald, J. P. A., & Kuiken, T. A. (2007) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00178.2007 · Cited by 215
Self-citationGraupe, D., Salahi, J., & Kohn, K. H. (1982) · Journal of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1016/0141-5425(82)90021-8 · Cited by 205 · cited 2×
“Investigation of Time-Domain Features Eleven frequently suggested time-domain features with high computational efficiency [10,12,15,26-28] for realtime EMG pattern recognition were assessed.”
Background
Cited by
Feature reduction and selection for EMG signal classification
Phinyomark, A., Phukpattaranont, P., & Limsakul, C. (2012) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.102 · Cited by 1,542
Control of Hand Prostheses Using Peripheral Information
Micera, S., Carpaneto, J., & Raspopovic, S. (2010) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2010.2085429 · Cited by 403
Xu, B., Akhtar, A., Liu, Y., Chen, H., Yeo, W., Park, S. I., Boyce, B., Kim, H., Yu, J., Lai, H., et al. (2016) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201504155 · Cited by 304
EMG Pattern Recognition in the Era of Big Data and Deep Learning
Phinyomark, A., & Scheme, E. (2018) · Big Data and Cognitive Computing · doi:10.3390/bdcc2030021 · Cited by 272
Evaluating EMG feature and classifier selection for application to partial-hand prosthesis control
Adewuyi, A. A., Hargrove, L. J., & Kuiken, T. A. (2016) · Frontiers in Neurorobotics · doi:10.3389/fnbot.2016.00015 · Cited by 85
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tkach, D., Huang, H., & Kuiken, T. A.
- Venue
- Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
- Published
- 2010-05-21
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-21
- ISSN
- 1743-0003 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2110119146
- Cited by
- 582
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 10.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Study of stability of time-domain features for electromyographic pattern recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1743-0003-7-21
- The paper
- Tkach, D., Huang, H., & Kuiken, T. A. (2010). Study of stability of time-domain features for electromyographic pattern recognition. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-7-21
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.