The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ecological status and traditional knowledge of medicinal plants in Kedarnath Wildlife Sanctuary of Garhwal Himalaya, India
Open accessAbstract
Background: Himalayan forests are the most important source of medicinal plants and with useful species for the local people. Kedarnath Wildlife Sanctuary (KWLS) is situated in the interior part of the Garhwal Himalayan region. The presented study was carried out in Madhmeshwar area of KWLS for the ecological status of medicinal plants and further focused on the ethnomedicinal uses of these plants in the study area. Methods: Ecological information about ethnomedicinal plants were collected using random quadrats in a random sampling technique along an altitudinal gradient in the KWLS. Information on medicinal properties of plants encountered in the present study was generated by questionnaire survey and was also compared with relevant literature. Results: A total of 152 medicinally important plant species were reported, in which 103 were found herbs, 32 shrubs and 17 were tree species which represented 123 genera of 61 families. A total of 18 plant species fell into the rare, endangered (critically endangered) and vulnerable status categories. Conclusion: The present study documented the traditional uses of medicinal plants, their ecological status and importance of these plants in the largest protected area of Garhwal Himalaya. This study can serve as baseline information on medicinal plants and could be helpful to further strengthen the conservation of this important resource.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ethnobotany of medicinal plants among the communities of Alpine and Sub-alpine regions of Pakistan
Kayani, S., Ahmad, M., Sultana, S., Khan Shinwari, Z., Zafar, M., Yaseen, G., Hussain, M., & Bibi, T. (2015) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.jep.2015.02.004 · Cited by 391
Asian Medicinal Plants’ Production and Utilization Potentials: A Review
Astutik, S., Pretzsch, J., & Ndzifon Kimengsi, J. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11195483 · Cited by 207
Podophyllum hexandrum and its active constituents: Novel radioprotectants
Anand, U., Biswas, P., Kumar, V., Ray, D., Ray, P., Loake, V. I. P., Kandimalla, R., Chaudhary, A., Singh, B., Routhu, N. K., et al. (2022) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112555 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Bhat, J. A., Kumar, M., & Bussmann, R. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
- Published
- 2013-01-02
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-1
- ISSN
- 1746-4269 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2097447448
- Cited by
- 737
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 36.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecological status and traditional knowledge of medicinal plants in Kedarnath Wildlife Sanctuary of Garhwal Himalaya, India. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1746-4269-9-1
- The paper
- Bhat, J. A., Kumar, M., & Bussmann, R. W. (2013). Ecological status and traditional knowledge of medicinal plants in Kedarnath Wildlife Sanctuary of Garhwal Himalaya, India. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-9-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.