Cited by 21Breastfeeding Practices and InfluencesHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsGlobal Maternal and Child Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Selling a service: experiences of peer supporters while promoting exclusive infant feeding in three sites in South Africa

Open access
Nkonki, Lungiswa L, Daniels, Karen L, PROMISE-EBF study group·2010·International Breastfeeding Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Even though it has been shown that peer support to mothers at home helps to increase exclusive breastfeeding, little is known about the experiences of peer supporters themselves and what is required of them to fulfil their day-to-day tasks. Therefore, a community-based randomised control trial using trained "lay" women to support exclusive infant feeding at home was implemented in three different sites across South Africa. The aim of this paper is to describe the experiences of peer supporters who promote exclusive infant feeding. METHODS: Three focus group discussions were held, in a language of their choice, with peer supporters. These meetings focused on how the peer educators utilised their time in the process of delivering the intervention. Data from the discussions were transcribed, with both verbatim and translated transcripts being used in the analysis. RESULTS: Unlike the services provided by mainstream health care, peer supporters had to market their services. They had to negotiate entry into the mother's home and then her life. Furthermore, they had to demonstrate competence and come across as professional and trustworthy. An HIV-positive mother's fear of being stigmatised posed an added burden - subsequent disclosure of her positive status would lead to an increased workload and emotional distress. Peer supporters spent most of their time in the field and had to learn the skill of self-management. Their support-base was enhanced when supervision focused on their working conditions as well as the delivery of their tasks. Despite this, they faced other insurmountable issues, such as mothers being compelled to offer their infants mixed feeding simultaneously due to normative practices and working in the fields postpartum. CONCLUSION: Designers of peer support interventions should consider the skills required for delivering health messages and the skills required for selling a service. Supportive supervision should be responsive both to the health care task and the challenges faced in the process of delivering it. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00297150.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1746-4358-5-17

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 A map of the process of delivery the intervention from peer supporters' perspective.
Figure 1 A map of the process of delivery the intervention from peer supporters' perspective.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 10.1080/08035250410023854 · DOI
  2. 10.1080/08035250510025752 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 21

Metadata

Authors
Nkonki, L. L., Daniels, K. L., & PROMISE-EBF study group
Affiliations
South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
Corresponding author
Nkonki, Lungiswa L
Venue
International Breastfeeding Journal
Published
2010
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
17
ISSN
1746-4358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2158229537
Cited by
21
References
24
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • International Breastfeeding Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
Keywords
peer supporters, lay health workers, peer educators, HIV-positive mothers, stigma, supportive supervision, self-management, mixed feeding, community-based intervention, South Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review