Cited by 22Asthma and respiratory diseasesPharmacy and Medical PracticesClinical practice guidelines implementation

Educational outreach to general practitioners reduces children’s asthma symptoms: a cluster randomised controlled trial

Open access
Zwarenstein, Merrick, Bheekie, Angeni, Lombard, Carl, Swingler, George, Ehrlich, Rodney, Eccles, Martin, Sladden, Michael, Pather, Sandra +2 more·2007·Implementation Science

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Childhood asthma is common in Cape Town, a province of South Africa, but is underdiagnosed by general practitioners. Medications are often prescribed inappropriately, and care is episodic. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of educational outreach to general practitioners on asthma symptoms of children in their practice. METHODS: This is a cluster randomised trial with general practices as the unit of intervention, randomisation, and analysis. The setting is Mitchells Plain (population 300,000), a dormitory town near Cape Town. Solo general practitioners, without nurse support, operate from storefront practices. Caregiver-reported symptom data were collected for 318 eligible children (2 to 17 years) with moderate to severe asthma, who were attending general practitioners in Mitchells Plain. One year post-intervention follow-up data were collected for 271 (85%) of these children in all 43 practices. Practices randomised to intervention (21) received two 30-minute educational outreach visits by a trained pharmacist who left materials describing key interventions to improve asthma care. Intervention and control practices received the national childhood asthma guideline. Asthma severity was measured in a parent-completed survey administered through schools using a symptom frequency and severity scale. We compared intervention and control group children on the change in score from pre-to one-year post-intervention. RESULTS: Symptom scores declined an additional 0.84 points in the intervention vs. control group (on a nine-point scale. p = 0.03). For every 12 children with asthma exposed to a doctor allocated to the intervention, one extra child will have substantially reduced symptoms. CONCLUSION: Educational outreach was accepted by general practitioners and was effective. It could be applied to other health care quality problems in this setting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1748-5908-2-30

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Zwarenstein 2007, the risk of reporting bias was judged unclear because there was no information on adherence to recommended practice.

    “Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No information on adherence to recommended practice”

    From Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice (2015) · cites this paper as Zwarenstein 2007

  • In Zwarenstein 2007, the overall risk of bias was judged unclear because 2 criteria were at unclear risk.

    “Risk of bias overall Unclear risk 2 criteria unclear risk”

    From Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice (2015) · cites this paper as Zwarenstein 2007

  • In Zwarenstein 2007, the risk of detection bias was judged low because data were based on a patient-completed questionnaire.

    “Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Low risk Symptom questionnaire completed by patients”

    From Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice (2015) · cites this paper as Zwarenstein 2007

  • In Zwarenstein 2007, the risk of selection bias from random sequence generation was judged low because a computer-generated list of random numbers was used.

    “Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote:”

    From Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice (2015) · cites this paper as Zwarenstein 2007

  • In Zwarenstein 2007, the risk of contamination bias was judged low because randomisation was at general practice level.

    “Contamination Low risk Randomised at general practice level”

    From Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice (2015) · cites this paper as Zwarenstein 2007

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bheekie A Pharmacist educational outreach for improved primary care of asthma in children [Pharm D thesis] School of Pharmacy 2001 University of the Western Cape; Bellville, South Africa

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zwarenstein, M., Bheekie, A., Lombard, C., Swingler, G., Ehrlich, R., Eccles, M., Sladden, M., Pather, S., Grimshaw, J., & Oxman, A. D.
Affiliations
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
  • University of the Western Cape (ZA)
  • South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • Leicester Royal Infirmary (GB)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Zwarenstein, Merrick
Venue
Implementation Science
Published
2007-09-24
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
30-30
ISSN
1748-5908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100864378
Cited by
22
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Implementation Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)) (acceptedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • European Commission
  • University of Cape Town
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
childhood asthma, educational outreach, general practitioners, pharmacist outreach, asthma symptom severity, asthma care quality, underdiagnosis, drug prescribing, asthma guidelines, primary care, Cape Town

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review