Cited by 68Public Health Policies and EducationHealth Policy Implementation ScienceGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology

Proposing a conceptual framework for integrated local public health policy, applied to childhood obesity - the behavior change ball

Open access
Hendriks, Anna-Marie, Jansen, Maria WJ, Gubbels, Jessica S, De Vries, Nanne K, Paulussen, Theo, Kremers, Stef PJ·2013·Implementation Science

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Childhood obesity is a 'wicked' public health problem that is best tackled by an integrated approach, which is enabled by integrated public health policies. The development and implementation of such policies have in practice proven to be difficult, however, and studying why this is the case requires a tool that may assist local policy-makers and those assisting them. A comprehensive framework that can help to identify options for improvement and to systematically develop solutions may be used to support local policy-makers. DISCUSSION: We propose the 'Behavior Change Ball' as a tool to study the development and implementation of integrated public health policies within local government. Based on the tenets of the 'Behavior Change Wheel' by Michie and colleagues (2011), the proposed conceptual framework distinguishes organizational behaviors of local policy-makers at the strategic, tactical and operational levels, as well as the determinants (motivation, capability, opportunity) required for these behaviors, and interventions and policy categories that can influence them. To illustrate the difficulty of achieving sustained integrated approaches, we use the metaphor of a ball in our framework: the mountainous landscapes surrounding the ball reflect the system's resistance to change (by making it difficult for the ball to roll). We apply this framework to the problem of childhood obesity prevention. The added value provided by the framework lies in its comprehensiveness, theoretical basis, diagnostic and heuristic nature and face validity. SUMMARY: Since integrated public health policies have not been widely developed and implemented in practice, organizational behaviors relevant to the development of these policies remain to be investigated. A conceptual framework that can assist in systematically studying the policy process may facilitate this. Our Behavior Change Ball adds significant value to existing public health policy frameworks by incorporating multiple theoretical perspectives, specifying a set of organizational behaviors and linking the analysis of these behaviors to interventions and policies. We would encourage examination by others of our framework as a tool to explain and guide the development of integrated policies for the prevention of wicked public health problems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1748-5908-8-46

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Warner M Gould N Kickbusch I Integrating Health in All policies at the local levels: using network governance to create ‘virtual reorganization by design Policy innovations for Health 2009 New York: Springer 125 163
  2. Kickbusch I Policy innovations for health 2009 New York: Springer
  3. Harting J Paauwe L Stronks K Theoretische perspectieven op intersectorale samenwerking en integraal beleid. Een thematische review. Theoretical perspectives on intersectoral collaboration and integrated policy: thematic review 2011 Amsterdam: AMC Sociale Geneeskunde
  4. Buse K Mays N Walt G Making health policy 2005 Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press
  5. Han JC Lawlor DA Kimm SYS Childhood obesity 2010: progress and challenges Lancet 2010 375 1737 1748 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60171-7 20451244 PMC3073855 · DOI
  6. Mayer-Foulkes D A survey of macro damages from Non-communicable chronic diseases: another challenge for global governance Global Economy Journal 2011 11 1 27
  7. Kremers SPJ De Bruijn GJ Visscher TLS Van Mechelen W De Vries NK Brug J Environmental influences on energy balance-related behaviors: a dual-process view Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2006 3 1 10 10.1186/1479-5868-3-1 16700907 PMC1481572 · DOI
  8. Steenbakkers M Lokaal integraal gezondheidsbeleid: realistische uitdaging of utopie? Een onderzoek binnen gemeenten naar mogelijkheden tot intersectorale samenwerking. [Local integrated health policy: realistic challenge or utopian dream? a study of opportunities for intersectoral collaboration in local government] PhD Thesis 2012 Maastricht: Maastricht University, Academic Collaborative Centre of Public Health Zuid Limburg
  9. Steenbakkers M Jansen MWJ Maarse H De Vries NK Sturing op integraal gezondheidsbeleid: de rol van gemeentelijke afdelingshoofden. Governance for integrated health policy: the role of heads of local government departments TSG: Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidswetenschappen 2011 89 266 273 10.1007/s12508-011-0089-y · DOI
  10. Borins S Innovation in the public sector Journal of Intellectual Capital 2001 2 310 319 10.1108/14691930110400128 · DOI
  11. Holling CS Adaptive environmental assessment and management 1978 Chichester: Wiley
  12. Jansen M Mind the gap: collaboration between practice, policy and research in local public health 2007 Maastricht University, Health Promotion Department: PhD Thesis
  13. Hoffman LR Norman AMD Maier RF Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups J Abnorm Soc Psychol 1981 62 401 407 13715029
  14. O’Neill M Intersectoral collaboration: the best of times, the worst of times Health Promot Int 1997 12 1 3 10.1093/heapro/12.1.1 · DOI
  15. Brown LD Feinberg ME Greenberg MT Measuring coalition functioning: refining constructs through factor analysis Health Educ Behav 2012 39 486 497 10.1177/1090198111419655 22193112 PMC3563297 · DOI
  16. Rogers EM Diffusion of innovations 2003 New York: Free Press
  17. Kingdon JW Agendas, alternatives and public policies 2003 New York: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc.
  18. LaPalombera J Dierkes M, Antal AB, Child J, Nonaka I Power and politics in organizations: public and private sector comparisons Handbook of organizational learning 2001 Oxford: Oxford University Press
  19. Robbins SP Judge TA Organizational behavior 2011 New Jersey: Prentice Hall
  20. Anthony R Planning and control systems: a framework for analysis 1965 Cambridge: Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration
  21. Schiffman J Generation of political priority for global health initiatives: a framework and case study of maternal mortality Am J Public Health 2007 97 796 803 10.2105/AJPH.2006.095455 17933652 · DOI
  22. Batie SS Wicked problems and applied economics American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2008 90 1176 1191
  23. Salas E Sims DE Burke CS Is there a big five in team work? Eur J Public Health 2005 15 576 579 10.1093/eurpub/cki068 16093304 · DOI
  24. Mellaard A Spanbroek K De GGD als advies- en regie-instituut. Regional public health services as advisory and supervisory institutes TSG Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidswetenschappen 2008 86 383 384 10.1007/BF03082118 · DOI
  25. Bridges W Managing transitions: making the most of change 2003 Cambridge: Perseus Publishing
  26. Sen AK Commodities and capabilities 1985 Oxford: Oxford University Press
  27. Schaufeli WB Work engagement. What Do We know and where Do We Go? Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology 2012 14 3 10
  28. Bakker AB Demerouti E The crossover of work engagement between working couples: a closer look at the role of empathy Journal of Managerial Psychology 2009 24 220 236 10.1108/02683940910939313 · DOI
  29. Bandura A Social learning theory 1977 Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hendriks, A.-M., Jansen, M. W., Gubbels, J. S., De Vries, N. K., Paulussen, T., & Kremers, S. P.
Affiliations
  • GGD Zuid Limburg (NL)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Hendriks, Anna-Marie
Venue
Implementation Science
Published
2013-04-18
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
46-46
ISSN
1748-5908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2138010874
Cited by
68
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 3
FWCI
18.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Implementation Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • TNO Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
ZonMw (200100001)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Keywords
childhood obesity, local government, Behaviour Change Wheel, wicked problems, policy process, organizational behavior, policy implementation, obesity prevention, conceptual framework
MeSH terms
Decision Making, Organizational, Diffusion of Innovation, Health Policy, Health Promotion, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Local Government, Obesity, Organizational Innovation, Professional Practice, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review