The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Jane: a new tool for the cophylogeny reconstruction problem
Open accessAbstract
Background: This paper describes the theory and implementation of a new software tool, called Jane, for the study of historical associations. This problem arises in parasitology (associations of hosts and parasites), molecular systematics (associations of orderings and genes), and biogeography (associations of regions and orderings). The underlying problem is that of reconciling pairs of trees subject to biologically plausible events and costs associated with these events. Existing software tools for this problem have strengths and limitations, and the new Jane tool described here provides functionality that complements existing tools. Results: The Jane software tool uses a polynomial time dynamic programming algorithm in conjunction with a genetic algorithm to find very good, and often optimal, solutions even for relatively large pairs of trees. The tool allows the user to provide rich timing information on both the host and parasite trees. In addition the user can limit host switch distance and specify multiple host switch costs by specifying regions in the host tree and costs for host switches between pairs of regions. Jane also provides a graphical user interface that allows the user to interactively experiment with modifications to the solutions found by the program. Conclusions: Jane is shown to be a useful tool for cophylogenetic reconstruction. Its functionality complements existing tools and it is therefore likely to be of use to researchers in the areas of parasitology, molecular systematics, and biogeography.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phylogenetic trees support the coevolution of parasites and their hosts
Hafner, M. S., & Nadler, S. A. (1988) · Nature · doi:10.1038/332258a0 · Cited by 408
Parasite specialization from a phylogenetic perspective: a new index of host specificity
POULIN, R., & MOUILLOT, D. (2003) · Parasitology · doi:10.1017/s0031182003002993 · Cited by 256
Speciation in fig pollinators and parasites
Weiblen, G. D., & Bush, G. L. (2002) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2002.01529.x · Cited by 196
Percy, D. M., Page, R. D. M., & Cronk, Q. C. B. (2004) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150490264996 · Cited by 182
Servedio, M. R. (2001) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01309.x · Cited by 141
Clade-Limited Colonization in Brood Parasitic Finches (Vidua spp.)
Sorenson, M. D., Balakrishnan, C. N., & Payne, R. B. (2004) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150490265021 · Cited by 127
Hughes, J., Kennedy, M., Johnson, K. P., Palma, R. L., & Page, R. (2007) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150701311370 · Cited by 122
When can host shifts produce congruent host and parasite phylogenies? A simulation approach
de Vienne, D. M., Giraud, T., & Shykoff, J. A. (2007) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01340.x · Cited by 111
Paterson, A. M., Wallis, G. P., Wallis, L. J., & Gray, R. D. (2000) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635159950127303 · Cited by 94
Merkle, D., & Middendorf, M. (2005) · Theory in Biosciences · doi:10.1016/j.thbio.2005.01.003 · Cited by 80
Cited by
The evolutionary history of vertebrate RNA viruses
Shi, M., Lin, X.-D., Chen, X., Tian, J.-H., Chen, L.-J., Li, K., Wang, W., Eden, J.-S., Shen, J.-J., Liu, L., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0012-7 · Cited by 774
An Extreme Case of Plant–Insect Codiversification: Figs and Fig-Pollinating Wasps
Cruaud, A., Rønsted, N., Chantarasuwan, B., Chou, L. S., Clement, W. L., Couloux, A., Cousins, B., Genson, G., Harrison, R. D., Hanson, P. E., et al. (2012) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/sys068 · Cited by 397
Self-citationPACo: A Novel Procrustes Application to Cophylogenetic Analysis
Balbuena, J. A., Míguez-Lozano, R., & Blasco-Costa, I. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061048 · Cited by 323
Geoghegan, J. L., Duchêne, S., & Holmes, E. C. (2017) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1006215 · Cited by 275
Voigt, O., Adamski, M., Sluzek, K., & Adamska, M. (2014) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/s12862-014-0230-z · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Conow, C., Fielder, D., Ovadia, Y., & Libeskind-Hadas, R.
- Venue
- Algorithms for Molecular Biology
- Published
- 2010-02-03
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-16
- ISSN
- 1748-7188 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2144454528
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 6.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Jane: a new tool for the cophylogeny reconstruction problem. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1748-7188-5-16
- The paper
- Conow, C., Fielder, D., Ovadia, Y., & Libeskind-Hadas, R. (2010). Jane: a new tool for the cophylogeny reconstruction problem. Algorithms for Molecular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7188-5-16
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.