The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Parasite specialization from a phylogenetic perspective: a new index of host specificity
Abstract
The host specificity of a parasite is not merely a function of how many host species it can exploit, but also of how closely related these host species are to each other. Here, a new index of host specificity is proposed, one that takes into account the average taxonomic or phylogenetic distance between pairs of host species used by a parasite. The index is derived from measures of taxonomic distinctness used in biodiversity studies. It is easy to compute and interpret, ranging from a minimum value of 1 when all host species are members of the same genus, to a maximum of 5, when all host species belong to different classes. The variance of this measure can also be computed, and provides additional information on the taxonomic or phylogenetic structure of the host assemblage. Using data on helminth parasites of Canadian freshwater fishes, we show that the new index, unlike the mere number of known host species, is independent of study effort i.e. the number of published records of a parasite. Although the index and the number of known hosts are not entirely independent statistically, each captures a different aspect of host specificity. For instance, although acanthocephalans infect significantly more host species than trematodes, cestodes or nematodes, there is no difference in the average index value among these 4 helminth taxa, suggesting that the average taxonomic distances between the host species of a parasite do not vary among these higher taxa. We recommend the use of our new index in future comparative studies of host specificity, in particular when the focus is on the evolutionary history of parasites and of their past colonizations of host lineages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity
Faith, D. P. (1992) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(92)91201-3 · Cited by 5,693
Getting the measure of biodiversity
Purvis, A., & Hector, A. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35012221 · Cited by 1,428
A taxonomic distinctness index and its statistical properties
CLARKE, K. R., & WARWICK, R. M. (1998) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.1998.3540523.x · Cited by 1,126
A further biodiversity index applicable to species lists: variation in taxonomic distinctness
Clarke, K., & Warwick, R. (2001) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps216265 · Cited by 1,058
New 'biodiversity' measures reveal a decrease in taxonomic distinctness with increasing stress
Warwick, R., & Clarke, K. (1995) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps129301 · Cited by 832
Evolutionary Ecology of Parasites: From individuals to communities
Poulin, R. (1997) · Cited by 436
Self-citationClarke, K., & Warwick, R. (1999) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps184021 · Cited by 392
Parascript: Parasites and the Language of Evolution
Hoberg, E. P., Brooks, D. R., & McLennan, D. A. (1993) · The Journal of Parasitology · doi:10.2307/3283745 · Cited by 372
(2001) · Murdoch University Research Portal · Cited by 310
Measuring Biodiversity Value for Conservation
Humphries, C. J. (1995) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.26.1.93 · Cited by 306
Cited by
Host and viral traits predict zoonotic spillover from mammals
Olival, K. J., Hosseini, P. R., Zambrana-Torrelio, C., Ross, N., Bogich, T. L., & Daszak, P. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature22975 · Cited by 1,130
Jane: a new tool for the cophylogeny reconstruction problem
Conow, C., Fielder, D., Ovadia, Y., & Libeskind-Hadas, R. (2010) · Algorithms for Molecular Biology · doi:10.1186/1748-7188-5-16 · Cited by 403
Plant apparency, an overlooked driver of associational resistance to insect herbivory
Castagneyrol, B., Giffard, B., Péré, C., & Jactel, H. (2013) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12055 · Cited by 290
A comparative study of ecological specialization estimators
Poisot, T., Canard, E., Mouquet, N., & Hochberg, M. E. (2012) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2011.00174.x · Cited by 156
Wardeh, M., Sharkey, K. J., & Baylis, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2019.2882 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- POULIN, R., & MOUILLOT, D.
- Venue
- Parasitology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 473-480
- ISSN
- 0031-1820 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8161
- OpenAlex
- W2119670789
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 7.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parasite specialization from a phylogenetic perspective: a new index of host specificity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0031182003002993
- The paper
- POULIN, R., & MOUILLOT, D. (2003). Parasite specialization from a phylogenetic perspective: a new index of host specificity. Parasitology. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182003002993
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.