Cited by 14Mental Health Treatment and AccessTreatment of Major DepressionPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Why do general practitioners prescribe antidepressants to their patients? A pilot study

Open access
Mercier, Alain, Auger-Aubin, Isabelle, Lebeau, Jean-Pierre, Schuers, Matthieu, Boulet, Pascal, Van Royen, Paul, Peremans, Lieve·2014·BioPsychoSocial Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The frequency of antidepressant (ADs) prescription is high, with general practitioners (GPs) responsible for about 80% of the prescriptions. Some studies considered prescriptions meet DSM criteria, while others stress inadequate use. The importance of biological and psychosocial determinants of GP prescription behaviour remains little explored. We aimed to describe the importance of these biological and psychosocial determinants and their weight in the daily practice of GPs'. METHODS: During a week chosen at random, 28 GPs collected the AD prescriptions made within the previous six months, regardless of the reason for the patient contact. Bio psychosocial and AD treatment characteristics were recorded for all patients. In a random sample of 50 patients, patient characteristics were assessed via a structured face-to-face interview with the GP. RESULTS: The frequency of AD prescription was 8.90% [3.94 -17.02]. The GPs initiated 65.6% [60.1-70.8] of the prescriptions. The rate of AD prescription for non-psychiatric conditions was 18%. Patients had from 1 to 9 conditions, showing a high level of multi-morbidity. There was a strong influence of past medical history and contextual problems, such as work related problems. CONCLUSION: AD prescription is related to complex contextual situations and multi-morbid patients. GPs use a bio psycho social approach, rather than a purely biological assessment. Awareness of these influences could improve prescription by GPs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1751-0759-8-17

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Expert-reviewed systematic frameworks for evaluating such apps have found inconsistent and/or contradictory results.

    “Furthermore, expert-reviewed systematic frameworks for evaluating such apps have found inconsistent and/or contradictory results.”

    From Digital health technologies and major depressive disorder (2023) · cites this paper as [155]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sleath B Shih Y-CT Sociological influences on antidepressant prescribing Soc Sci Med 1982 56 6 1335 1344 12600369

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mercier, A., Auger-Aubin, I., Lebeau, J.-P., Schuers, M., Boulet, P., Van Royen, P., & Peremans, L.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Université de Tours (FR)
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
Corresponding author
Mercier, Alain
Venue
BioPsychoSocial Medicine
Published
2014
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
17
ISSN
1751-0759 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2141823974
Cited by
14
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BioPsychoSocial Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
antidepressant prescribing, general practitioners, prescription behavior, psychosocial factors, biological determinants, multimorbidity, work-related problems, medical history, biopsychosocial model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review