Cited by 66Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksMachine Learning in BioinformaticsBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

The use of Gene Ontology terms for predicting highly-connected 'hub' nodes in protein-protein interaction networks

Open access
Hsing, Michael, Byler, Kendall Grant, Cherkasov, Artem·2008·BMC Systems Biology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Protein-protein interactions mediate a wide range of cellular functions and responses and have been studied rigorously through recent large-scale proteomics experiments and bioinformatics analyses. One of the most important findings of those endeavours was the observation that 'hub' proteins participate in significant numbers of protein interactions and play critical roles in the organization and function of cellular protein interaction networks (PINs) 12. It has also been demonstrated that such hub proteins may constitute an important pool of attractive drug targets.Thus, it is crucial to be able to identify hub proteins based not only on experimental data but also by means of bioinformatics predictions. RESULTS: A hub protein classifier has been developed based on the available interaction data and Gene Ontology (GO) annotations for proteins in the Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Drosophila melanogaster and Homo sapiens genomes. In particular, by utilizing the machine learning method of boosting trees we were able to create a predictive bioinformatics tool for the identification of proteins that are likely to play the role of a hub in protein interaction networks. Testing the developed hub classifier on external sets of experimental protein interaction data in Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) 252 and Caenorhabditis elegans demonstrated that our approach can predict hub proteins with a high degree of accuracy.A practical application of the developed bioinformatics method has been illustrated by the effective protein bait selection for large-scale pull-down experiments that aim to map complete protein-protein interaction networks for several species. CONCLUSION: The successful development of an accurate hub classifier demonstrated that highly-connected proteins tend to share certain relevant functional properties reflected in their Gene Ontology annotations. It is anticipated that the developed bioinformatics hub classifier will represent a useful tool for the theoretical prediction of highly-interacting proteins, the study of cellular network organizations, and the identification of prospective drug targets - even in those organisms that currently lack large-scale protein interaction data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1752-0509-2-80

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GO terms and HTS results can be translated into input features for cheminformatics models.

    “For instance, it was demonstrated that gene ontology (GO) terms125 and HTS results can be translated into input features for cheminformatics models.126”

    From QSAR without borders (2020) · cites this paper as [126]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hsing, M., Byler, K. G., & Cherkasov, A.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Hsing, Michael
Venue
BMC Systems Biology
Published
2008-09-16
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
80-80
ISSN
1752-0509 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970772422
Cited by
66
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Systems Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • cIRcle (University of British Columbia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Collections
Funders
  • Genome Canada
  • Michael Smith Health Research BC
  • Genome British Columbia
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Keywords
hub proteins, protein-protein interaction network, gene ontology annotation, boosting trees, drug target identification, Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Drosophila melanogaster, human, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Caenorhabditis elegans
MeSH terms
Animals, Genes, Humans, Protein Binding, Sensitivity and Specificity, Staphylococcus aureus, Reproducibility of Results, Genome, Caenorhabditis elegans, Computational Biology, Protein Interaction Mapping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review