The use of Gene Ontology terms for predicting highly-connected 'hub' nodes in protein-protein interaction networks
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Protein-protein interactions mediate a wide range of cellular functions and responses and have been studied rigorously through recent large-scale proteomics experiments and bioinformatics analyses. One of the most important findings of those endeavours was the observation that 'hub' proteins participate in significant numbers of protein interactions and play critical roles in the organization and function of cellular protein interaction networks (PINs) 12. It has also been demonstrated that such hub proteins may constitute an important pool of attractive drug targets.Thus, it is crucial to be able to identify hub proteins based not only on experimental data but also by means of bioinformatics predictions. RESULTS: A hub protein classifier has been developed based on the available interaction data and Gene Ontology (GO) annotations for proteins in the Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Drosophila melanogaster and Homo sapiens genomes. In particular, by utilizing the machine learning method of boosting trees we were able to create a predictive bioinformatics tool for the identification of proteins that are likely to play the role of a hub in protein interaction networks. Testing the developed hub classifier on external sets of experimental protein interaction data in Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) 252 and Caenorhabditis elegans demonstrated that our approach can predict hub proteins with a high degree of accuracy.A practical application of the developed bioinformatics method has been illustrated by the effective protein bait selection for large-scale pull-down experiments that aim to map complete protein-protein interaction networks for several species. CONCLUSION: The successful development of an accurate hub classifier demonstrated that highly-connected proteins tend to share certain relevant functional properties reflected in their Gene Ontology annotations. It is anticipated that the developed bioinformatics hub classifier will represent a useful tool for the theoretical prediction of highly-interacting proteins, the study of cellular network organizations, and the identification of prospective drug targets - even in those organisms that currently lack large-scale protein interaction data.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GO terms and HTS results can be translated into input features for cheminformatics models.
“For instance, it was demonstrated that gene ontology (GO) terms125 and HTS results can be translated into input features for cheminformatics models.126”
From QSAR without borders (2020) · cites this paper as [126]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Text Mining for Metabolic Pathways, Signaling Cascades, and Protein Networks
Hoffmann, R., Krallinger, M., Andres, E., Tamames, J., Blaschke, C., & Valencia, A. (2005) · Science's STKE · doi:10.1126/stke.2832005pe21 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Muratov, E. N., Bajorath, J., Sheridan, R. P., Tetko, I. V., Filimonov, D., Poroikov, V., Oprea, T. I., Baskin, I. I., Varnek, A., Roitberg, A., et al. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00098a · Cited by 913 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Hsing, M., Byler, K. G., & Cherkasov, A.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Hsing, Michael
- Venue
- BMC Systems Biology
- Published
- 2008-09-16
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 80-80
- ISSN
- 1752-0509 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2553323
- OpenAlex
- W1970772422
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BMC Systems Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- cIRcle (University of British Columbia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Open Collections
- Funders
- Genome Canada
- Michael Smith Health Research BC
- Genome British Columbia
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
- Keywords
- hub proteins, protein-protein interaction network, gene ontology annotation, boosting trees, drug target identification, Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Drosophila melanogaster, human, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Caenorhabditis elegans
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Genes, Humans, Protein Binding, Sensitivity and Specificity, Staphylococcus aureus, Reproducibility of Results, Genome, Caenorhabditis elegans, Computational Biology, Protein Interaction Mapping
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review