Cited by 36Psychiatric care and mental health servicesHealthcare Quality and ManagementMental Health and Patient Involvement

Achievements in mental health outcome measurement in Australia: Reflections on progress made by the Australian Mental Health Outcomes and Classification Network (AMHOCN)

Open access
Burgess, Philip, Coombs, Tim, Clarke, Adam, Dickson, Rosemary, Pirkis, Jane·2012·International Journal of Mental Health Systems

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Australia's National Mental Health Strategy has emphasised the quality, effectiveness and efficiency of services, and has promoted the collection of outcomes and casemix data as a means of monitoring these. All public sector mental health services across Australia now routinely report outcomes and casemix data. Since late-2003, the Australian Mental Health Outcomes and Classification Network (AMHOCN) has received, processed, analysed and reported on outcome data at a national level, and played a training and service development role. This paper documents the history of AMHOCN's activities and achievements, with a view to providing lessons for others embarking on similar exercises. METHOD: We conducted a desktop review of relevant documents to summarise the history of AMHOCN. RESULTS: AMHOCN has operated within a framework that has provided an overarching structure to guide its activities but has been flexible enough to allow it to respond to changing priorities. With no precedents to draw upon, it has undertaken activities in an iterative fashion with an element of 'trial and error'. It has taken a multi-pronged approach to ensuring that data are of high quality: developing innovative technical solutions; fostering 'information literacy'; maximising the clinical utility of data at a local level; and producing reports that are meaningful to a range of audiences. CONCLUSION: AMHOCN's efforts have contributed to routine outcome measurement gaining a firm foothold in Australia's public sector mental health services.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1752-4458-6-4

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Implementing the Australian initiative on a large scale required considerable investment in mental health providers, ongoing training, and a broad engagement program.

    “To be able to implement this initiative on such a large scale required considerable investment in mental health providers, ongoing training and a broad program of engagement 79 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Australian Mental Health Outcomes and Classification Network Public Reporting of Organisational Performance: A Review of the Literature 2010 Australian Mental Health Outcomes and Classification Network, Brisbane
  2. Healthcare Management Advisors Review of the Australian Mental Health Outcomes and Classification Network (AMHOCN: Final Report 2011 Healthcare Management Advisors, Adelaide

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burgess, P., Coombs, T., Clarke, A., Dickson, R., & Pirkis, J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • New South Wales Institute of Psychiatry (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Burgess, Philip
Venue
International Journal of Mental Health Systems
Published
2012
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
4
ISSN
1752-4458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2101423139
Cited by
36
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • International Journal of Mental Health Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Keywords
routine outcome measurement, public mental health services, National Mental Health Strategy, data quality, information literacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review