The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genomic selection using regularized linear regression models: ridge regression, lasso, elastic net and their extensions.
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Genomic selection (GS) is emerging as an efficient and cost-effective method for estimating breeding values using molecular markers distributed over the entire genome. In essence, it involves estimating the simultaneous effects of all genes or chromosomal segments and combining the estimates to predict the total genomic breeding value (GEBV). Accurate prediction of GEBVs is a central and recurring challenge in plant and animal breeding. The existence of a bewildering array of approaches for predicting breeding values using markers underscores the importance of identifying approaches able to efficiently and accurately predict breeding values. Here, we comparatively evaluate the predictive performance of six regularized linear regression methods-- ridge regression, ridge regression BLUP, lasso, adaptive lasso, elastic net and adaptive elastic net-- for predicting GEBV using dense SNP markers. METHODS: We predicted GEBVs for a quantitative trait using a dataset on 3000 progenies of 20 sires and 200 dams and an accompanying genome consisting of five chromosomes with 9990 biallelic SNP-marker loci simulated for the QTL-MAS 2011 workshop. We applied all the six methods that use penalty-based (regularization) shrinkage to handle datasets with far more predictors than observations. The lasso, elastic net and their adaptive extensions further possess the desirable property that they simultaneously select relevant predictive markers and optimally estimate their effects. The regression models were trained with a subset of 2000 phenotyped and genotyped individuals and used to predict GEBVs for the remaining 1000 progenies without phenotypes. Predictive accuracy was assessed using the root mean squared error, the Pearson correlation between predicted GEBVs and (1) the true genomic value (TGV), (2) the true breeding value (TBV) and (3) the simulated phenotypic values based on fivefold cross-validation (CV). RESULTS: The elastic net, lasso, adaptive lasso and the adaptive elastic net all had similar accuracies but outperformed ridge regression and ridge regression BLUP in terms of the Pearson correlation between predicted GEBVs and the true genomic value as well as the root mean squared error. The performance of RR-BLUP was also somewhat better than that of ridge regression. This pattern was replicated by the Pearson correlation between predicted GEBVs and the true breeding values (TBV) and the root mean squared error calculated with respect to TBV, except that accuracy was lower for all models, most especially for the adaptive elastic net. The correlation between the predicted GEBV and simulated phenotypic values based on the fivefold CV also revealed a similar pattern except that the adaptive elastic net had lower accuracy than both the ridge regression methods. CONCLUSIONS: All the six models had relatively high prediction accuracies for the simulated data set. Accuracy was higher for the lasso type methods than for ridge regression and ridge regression BLUP.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We used the elastic net algorithm, given substantial evidence that penalization improves prediction accuracy,25–27 alongside its well-established accuracy and robustness28,29 and ability to maintain clinical interpretability compared with less transparent machine learning algorithms (eg, random forests, neural networks).”
From A pilot study using frequent inpatient assessments of suicidal thinking to predict short-term postdischarge suicidal behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [28]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162
Regularization and Variable Selection Via the Elastic Net
Zou, H., & Hastie, T. (2005) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x · Cited by 20,957
Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent
Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2010) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v033.i01 · Cited by 19,927
Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems
Hoerl, A. E., & Kennard, R. W. (1970) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1970.10488634 · Cited by 9,648
Efron, B., Hastie, T., Johnstone, I., & Tibshirani, R. (2004) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/009053604000000067 · Cited by 9,357
Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties
B, J. F. A., & Li, R. (2001) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214501753382273 · Cited by 8,919
The adaptive lasso and its oracle properties
Zou, H. (2006) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214506000000735 · Cited by 7,470
Model Selection and Estimation in Regression with Grouped Variables
Yuan, M., & Lin, Y. (2006) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00532.x · Cited by 7,261
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Ytournel F: Linkage disequilibrium and QTL fine mapping in a selected population. PhD thesis, Station de Génétique Quantitative et Appliquée, INRA. 2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
On hyperparameter optimization of machine learning algorithms: Theory and practice
Yang, L., & Shami, A. A. (2020) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2020.07.061 · Cited by 3,530
Luo, W., Phung, D., Tran, T., Gupta, S., Rana, S., Karmakar, C., Shilton, A., Yearwood, J., Dimitrova, N., Ho, T. B., et al. (2016) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.5870 · Cited by 988
Yaseen, Z. M., Sulaiman, S. O., Deo, R. C., & Chau, K. (2018) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.11.069 · Cited by 704
Genomic selection: genome-wide prediction in plant improvement
Desta, Z. A., & Ortiz, R. O. (2014) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2014.05.006 · Cited by 721
A Review of Feature Reduction Techniques in Neuroimaging
Mwangi, B., Tian, T. S., & Soares, J. C. (2014) · Neuroinformatics · doi:10.1007/s12021-013-9204-3 · Cited by 559
Polygenic scores via penalized regression on summary statistics
Mak, T. S. H., Porsch, R. M., Choi, S. W., Zhou, X., & Sham, P. C. (2017) · Genetic Epidemiology · doi:10.1002/gepi.22050 · Cited by 483
Enhancing Genetic Gain through Genomic Selection: From Livestock to Plants
Xu, Y., Liu, X., Fu, J., Wang, H., Wang, J., Huang, C., Prasanna, B. M., Olsen, M. S., Wang, G., & Zhang, A. (2019) · Plant Communications · doi:10.1016/j.xplc.2019.100005 · Cited by 318
Kumar, R., Das, S. P., Choudhury, B. U., Kumar, A., Prakash, N. R., Verma, R., Chakraborti, M., Devi, A. G., Bhattacharjee, B., Das, R., et al. (2024) · Biological Research · doi:10.1186/s40659-024-00562-6 · Cited by 286
Evaluation of the lasso and the elastic net in genome-wide association studies
Waldmann, P., Mészáros, G., Gredler, B., Fuerst, C., & Sölkner, J. (2013) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2013.00270 · Cited by 270
Wang, S., Celebi, M. E., Zhang, Y., Yu, X., Lu, S., Yao, X., Zhou, Q., Miguel, M.-G., Tian, Y., Górriz, J. M., et al. (2021) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.07.001 · Cited by 252
Budhlakoti, N., Kushwaha, A. K., Rai, A. K., Chaturvedi, K. K., Kumar, A., Pradhan, A. K., Kumar, U., Kumar, R. R., Juliana, P., Mishra, D. C., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.832153 · Cited by 244
Emmert‐Streib, F., & Dehmer, M. (2019) · Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction · doi:10.3390/make1010021 · Cited by 217
Wang, H., Lengerich, B. J., Aragam, B., & Xing, E. P. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty750 · Cited by 200
A stage‐wise approach for the analysis of multi‐environment trials
Piepho, H., Möhring, J., Schulz‐Streeck, T., & Ogutu, J. O. (2012) · Biometrical Journal · doi:10.1002/bimj.201100219 · Cited by 193
Self-citationOptimization of genomic selection training populations with a genetic algorithm
Akdemir, D., y Sánchez, J. I., & Jannink, J. (2015) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/s12711-015-0116-6 · Cited by 198
Genomic Selection for Drought Tolerance Using Genome-Wide SNPs in Maize
Shikha, M., Kanika, A., Rao, A. R., Mallikarjuna, M. G., Gupta, H. S., & Thirunavukkarasu, N. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.00550 · Cited by 186
Machine learning approaches for crop improvement: Leveraging phenotypic and genotypic big data
Tong, H., & Nikoloski, Z. (2020) · Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2020.153354 · Cited by 185
Integrated Genomic Selection for Accelerating Breeding Programs of Climate-Smart Cereals
Sinha, D., Maurya, A. K., Abdi, G., Majeed, M., Agarwal, R., Mukherjee, R., Ganguly, S., Aziz, R., Bhatia, M., Majgaonkar, A., et al. (2023) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes14071484 · Cited by 184
Deep Learning and Neurology: A Systematic Review
Valliani, A. A.-A., Ranti, D. L., & Oermann, E. K. (2019) · Neurology and Therapy · doi:10.1007/s40120-019-00153-8 · Cited by 184
Quantifying performance of machine learning methods for neuroimaging data
Jollans, L., Boyle, R. T., Artiges, É., Banaschewski, T., Desrivières, S., Grigis, A., Martinot, J., Paus, T., Smolka, M. N., Walter, H., et al. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.082 · Cited by 177
An evaluation of machine-learning for predicting phenotype: studies in yeast, rice, and wheat
Grinberg, N. F., Orhobor, O. I., & King, R. D. (2019) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-019-05848-5 · Cited by 169
Radiomics and Deep Learning: Hepatic Applications
Park, H. J., Park, B., & Lee, S. S. (2020) · Korean Journal of Radiology · doi:10.3348/kjr.2019.0752 · Cited by 160
Vadapalli, S., Abdelhalim, H., Zeeshan, S., & Ahmed, Z. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbac191 · Cited by 168
Nicholls, H. L., John, C. R., Watson, D. S., Munroe, P. B., Barnes, M. R., & Cabrera, C. P. (2020) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2020.00350 · Cited by 155
AI applications in functional genomics
Caudai, C., Galizia, A., Geraci, F., Pera, L. L., Morea, V., Salerno, E., Via, A., & Colombo, T. (2021) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2021.10.009 · Cited by 155
Deepa, N., Prabadevi, B., Maddikunta, P. K. R., Gadekallu, T. R., Baker, T., Khan, A., & Tariq, U. (2020) · The Journal of Supercomputing · doi:10.1007/s11227-020-03347-2 · Cited by 146
A stacking ensemble deep learning approach to cancer type classification based on TCGA data
Mohammed, M., Mwambi, H. G., Mboya, I. B., Elbashir, M. K., & Omolo, B. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-95128-x · Cited by 149
Genomic Selection for Predicting Fusarium Head Blight Resistance in a Wheat Breeding Program
de Arruda, M. P., Brown, P. J., Lipka, A. E., Krill, A. M., Thurber, C. S., & Kolb, F. L. (2015) · The Plant Genome · doi:10.3835/plantgenome2015.01.0003 · Cited by 138
Genetic architecture of male floral traits required for hybrid wheat breeding
Boeven, P. H. G., Longin, C. F. H., Leiser, W. L., Kollers, S., Ebmeyer, E., & Würschum, T. (2016) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-016-2771-6 · Cited by 142
Smart Water Quality Monitoring with IoT Wireless Sensor Networks
Singh, Y., & Walingo, T. M. (2024) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s24092871 · Cited by 137
Factors affecting genomic selection revealed by empirical evidence in maize
Liu, X., Wang, H., Wang, H., Guo, Z., Xu, X., Liu, J., Wang, S., Li, W., Zou, C., Prasanna, B. M., et al. (2018) · The Crop Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cj.2018.03.005 · Cited by 139
Machine learning-based statistical testing hypothesis for fault detection in photovoltaic systems
Fazai, R., Abodayeh, K., Mansouri, M. M., Trabelsi, M., Nounou, H. N., Nounou, M. N., & Georghiou, G. E. (2019) · Solar Energy · doi:10.1016/j.solener.2019.08.032 · Cited by 136
Evaluation and prediction of slope stability using machine learning approaches
Lin, S., Zheng, H., Han, C., Han, B., & Li, W. (2021) · Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11709-021-0742-8 · Cited by 128
Liang, H., Jiang, K., Yan, T., & Chen, G. (2021) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.1c00100 · Cited by 127
Arizmendi, C. J., Bernacki, M. L., Raković, M., Plumley, R. D., Urban, C. J., Panter, A. T., Greene, J. A., & Gates, K. M. (2022) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-022-01939-9 · Cited by 141
Gwak, J., Hirao, A., & Shino, M. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10082890 · Cited by 121
Beyond genomics: understanding exposotypes through metabolomics
Rattray, N. J. W., Deziel, N. C., Wallach, J. D., Khan, S. A., Vasiliou, V., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Johnson, C. H. (2018) · Human Genomics · doi:10.1186/s40246-018-0134-x · Cited by 121
The Current and Future Use of Ridge Regression for Prediction in Quantitative Genetics
de Vlaming, R., & Groenen, P. J. F. (2015) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2015/143712 · Cited by 117
A Stacking Ensemble Learning Framework for Genomic Prediction
Liang, M., Chang, T., An, B., Duan, X., Du, L., Wang, X., Miao, J., Xu, L., Gao, X., Zhang, L., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.600040 · Cited by 110
Wu, M., Mwangi, B., Bauer, I. E., Passos, I. C., Sanches, M., Zunta‐Soares, G. B., Meyer, T. D., Hasan, K. M., & Soares, J. C. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.016 · Cited by 112
Xu, S., Xu, X., Zhu, Q., Yang, M., Yang, G., Feng, H., Yang, M., Zhu, Q., Xue, H., & Wang, B. (2023) · Precision Agriculture · doi:10.1007/s11119-023-10042-8 · Cited by 103
Lee, T.-F., Chao, P., Ting, H.-M., Chang, L., Huang, Y.-J., Wu, J., Wang, H., Horng, M., Chang, C., Lan, J.-H., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089700 · Cited by 103
Genomic selection across multiple breeding cycles in applied bread wheat breeding
Michel, S., Ametz, C., GÜNGÖR, H., Epure, D. G., Grausgruber, H., Löschenberger, F., & Buerstmayr, H. (2016) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-016-2694-2 · Cited by 100
Wang, S. B., Coppersmith, D. D. L., Kleiman, E. M., Bentley, K. H., Millner, A. J., Fortgang, R., Mair, P., Dempsey, W., Huffman, J. C., & Nock, M. K. (2021) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0591 · Cited by 98
Lipid Profiles and Heart Failure Risk
Wittenbecher, C., Eichelmann, F., Toledo, E., Guasch‐Ferré, M., Ruiz‐Canela, M., Li, J., Arós, F., Lee, C., Liang, L., Salas‐Salvadó, J., et al. (2020) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.120.317883 · Cited by 101
Lee, Y. H. (2018) · Journal of Digital Imaging · doi:10.1007/s10278-018-0066-y · Cited by 97
Riedelsheimer, C., Technow, F., & Melchinger, A. E. (2012) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-13-452 · Cited by 94
Statistical workflow for feature selection in human metabolomics data
Antonelli, J., Claggett, B. L., Henglin, M., Kim, A., Ovsak, G., Kim, N., Deng, K., Rao, K., Tyagi, O., Watrous, J. D., et al. (2019) · Metabolites · doi:10.3390/metabo9070143 · Cited by 88
Lourenço, V., Ogutu, J. O., Rodrigues, R. A. P., Posekany, A., & Piepho, H. (2024) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-023-09933-x · Cited by 89
Self-citationGenomic selection for wheat traits and trait stability
Huang, M. F., Cabrera, A., Hoffstetter, A., Griffey, C. A., Sanford, D. A. V., Costa, J., McKendry, A. L., Chao, S., & Sneller, C. (2016) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-016-2733-z · Cited by 86
Nishat, M. H., Khan, M. H. R. B., Ahmed, T., Hossain, S. N., Ahsan, A., Elsergany, M., Shafiquzzaman, M., Imteaz, M. A., & Alresheedi, M. T. (2025) · Environmental Sciences Europe · doi:10.1186/s12302-025-01078-w · Cited by 83
Genomic Selection using Multiple Populations
Schulz‐Streeck, T., Ogutu, J. O., Karaman, Z., Knaak, C., & Piepho, H. (2012) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2012.03.0160 · Cited by 83
Self-citationAdvances in flux balance analysis by integrating machine learning and mechanism-based models
Sahu, A., Blätke, M. A., Szymański, J., & Töpfer, N. (2021) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2021.08.004 · Cited by 86
Xie, T., Wang, Z., Zhao, Q., Bai, Q., Zhou, X., Gu, Y., Peng, W., & Wang, H. (2019) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2019.00505 · Cited by 81
Omics Approaches for Engineering Wheat Production under Abiotic Stresses
Shah, T. M., Xu, J., Zou, X., Cheng, Y., Nasir, M., & Zhang, X. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms19082390 · Cited by 80
Digitalizing breeding in plants: A new trend of next-generation breeding based on genomic prediction
Jeon, D., Kang, Y., Lee, S., Choi, S., Sung, Y., Lee, T., & Kim, C. (2023) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1092584 · Cited by 81
Machine learning and its applications in plant molecular studies
Sun, S., Wang, C., Ding, H., & Zou, Q. (2019) · Briefings in Functional Genomics · doi:10.1093/bfgp/elz036 · Cited by 80
Improving Water Quality Index Prediction Using Regression Learning Models
Jesmeen, M. Z. H., Aziz, N. A. A., Alelyani, S., Mohana, M., & Hosain, M. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192013702 · Cited by 76
Implementation of Genomic Prediction in Lolium perenne (L.) Breeding Populations
Grinberg, N. F., Lovatt, A., Hegarty, M., Lovatt, A., Skøt, K. P., Kelly, R., Blackmore, T. M., Thorogood, D., King, R. D., Armstead, I. P., et al. (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.00133 · Cited by 75
Walsh, C., & Hripcsak, G. (2014) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2014.08.006 · Cited by 75
Onogi, A., Ideta, O., Inoshita, Y., Ebana, K., Yoshioka, T., Yamasaki, M., & Iwata, H. (2014) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-014-2411-y · Cited by 80
Machine learning enhances prediction of illness course: a longitudinal study in eating disorders
Haynos, A. F., Wang, S. B., Lipson, S., Peterson, C. B., Mitchell, J. E., Halmi, K. A., Agras, W. S., & Crow, S. J. (2021) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291720000227 · Cited by 73
GBS‐Based Genomic Selection for Pea Grain Yield under Severe Terminal Drought
Annicchiarico, P., Nazzicari, N., Pecetti, L., Romani, M., Ferrari, B., Wei, Y., & Brummer, E. C. (2017) · The Plant Genome · doi:10.3835/plantgenome2016.07.0072 · Cited by 72
Michel, S., Ametz, C., GÜNGÖR, H., Akgöl, B., Epure, D. G., Grausgruber, H., Löschenberger, F., & Buerstmayr, H. (2016) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-016-2818-8 · Cited by 71
Galán, R. J., Bernal-Vasquez, A.-M., Jebsen, C., Piepho, H., Thorwarth, P., Steffan, P. M., Gordillo, A., & Miedaner, T. (2020) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-020-03651-8 · Cited by 67
Self-citationHung, Y., & Verbeke, W. (2017) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.02.017 · Cited by 63
Economic and energy impacts on greenhouse gas emissions: A case study of China and the USA
Yamaka, W., Phadkantha, R., & Rakpho, P. (2021) · Energy Reports · doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2021.06.040 · Cited by 60
Xu, S., Xu, X., Blacker, C., Gaulton, R. G., Zhu, Q., Yang, M., Yang, G., Zhang, J., Yang, Y., Yang, M., et al. (2023) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs15030854 · Cited by 60
Altelbany, S. (2021) · Journal of Applied Economics and Business Studies · doi:10.34260/jaebs.517 · Cited by 57
Langenberger, B., Schrednitzki, D., Halder, A. M., Busse, R., & Pross, C. M. (2023) · Bone and Joint Research · doi:10.1302/2046-3758.129.bjr-2023-0070.r2 · Cited by 57
Comparison of forecast models of production of dairy cows combining animal and diet parameters
Nguyen, T., Fouchereau, R., Frénod, E., Gérard, C., & Sincholle, V. (2020) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2020.105258 · Cited by 55
Adong, P., Bainomugisha, E., Okure, D., & Sserunjogi, R. (2022) · Applied AI Letters · doi:10.1002/ail2.76 · Cited by 51
Hierarchical Incomplete Multi-source Feature Learning for Spatiotemporal Event Forecasting
Zhao, L., Ye, J., Chen, F., Lu, C., & Ramakrishnan, N. (2016) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939847 · Cited by 49
Bayesian model averaging to improve the yield prediction in wheat breeding trials
Fei, S., Chen, Z., Li, L., Ma, Y., & Xiao, Y. (2022) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.109237 · Cited by 50
Yamashiro, H., & Nonaka, H. (2021) · Operations Research Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.orp.2021.100196 · Cited by 47
Enhancing Genome-Enabled Prediction by Bagging Genomic BLUP
Daniel Gianola, B., WEIGEL, K. A., Krämer, N., Stella, A., & Schön, C. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0091693 · Cited by 47
Deep neural networks for genomic prediction do not estimate marker effects
Ubbens, J. R., Parkin, I. A. P., Eynck, C., Stavness, I., & Sharpe, A. (2021) · The Plant Genome · doi:10.1002/tpg2.20147 · Cited by 46
Kawakita, S., Beaumont, J. L., Jucaud, V., & Everly, M. J. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-75473-z · Cited by 46
Some Priors for Sparse Regression Modelling
Griffin, J. E., & Brown, P. J. (2013) · Bayesian Analysis · doi:10.1214/13-ba827 · Cited by 45
Arabameri, A., Rezaie, F., Pal, S. C., Cerdà, A., Saha, A., Chakrabortty, R., & Lee, S. (2021) · Geoscience Frontiers · doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101230 · Cited by 44
Occupational stress among farm and ranch operators in the midwestern United States
Chengane, S., Beseler, C. L., Duysen, E. G., & Rautiainen, R. H. (2021) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-021-12053-4 · Cited by 48
Phenomics based prediction of plant biomass and leaf area in wheat using machine learning approaches
Singh, B., Kumar, S., Elangovan, A., Vasht, D., Arya, S., Đức, N. T., Swami, P., Pawar, G. S., Raju, D., Krishna, H., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1214801 · Cited by 43
Evaluation of GBLUP, BayesB and elastic net for genomic prediction in Chinese Simmental beef cattle
Wang, X., Miao, J., Chang, T., Xia, J., An, B., Li, Y., Xu, L., Zhang, L., Gao, X., Li, J., et al. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0210442 · Cited by 43
Zhang, T., Zhou, X.-P., & Liu, X. F. (2020) · Engineering Geology · doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105617 · Cited by 43
Fei, S., Hassan, M. A., Ma, Y., Shu, M., Cheng, Q. S., Li, Z., Chen, Z., & Xiao, Y. (2021) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.730181 · Cited by 42
Introduction to Supervised Learning
Verma, R., Nagar, V., & Mahapatra, S. (2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119785620.ch1 · Cited by 42
Kim, G., Hong, J.-P., Lee, H., Kwon, J., Kim, D.-A., & Kang, B. (2022) · Horticulture Research · doi:10.1093/hr/uhac204 · Cited by 41
Biometric and biotechnology strategies in Jatropha genetic breeding for biodiesel production
Laviola, B. G., Rodrigues, E. V., Teodoro, P. E., Peixoto, L. D. A., & Bhering, L. L. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.116 · Cited by 41
Mostafaei, S., Kazemnejad, A., Jamalkandi, S. A., Amirhashchi, S., Donnelly, S. C., Armstrong, M. E., & Doroudian, M. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-33986-8 · Cited by 41
Priya, S., Liu, Y., Ward, C. E., Le, N. H., Soni, N., Maheshwarappa, R. P., Monga, V., Zhang, H., Milan Sonka, A., & Bathla, G. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-90032-w · Cited by 45
Dhillon, R., Takoo, G., Sharma, V., & Nagle, M. (2024) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2024.108982 · Cited by 39
Genomic selection for boar taint compounds and carcass traits in a commercial pig population
de Campos, C. F., Lopes, M. S., Silva, F. F. E., Veroneze, R., Knol, E. F., Lopes, P. S., & Guimarães, S. E. F. (2015) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2015.01.018 · Cited by 39
Review of applications of artificial intelligence (AI) methods in crop research
Bose, S., Banerjee, S., Kumar, S., Saha, A., Nandy, D., & Hazra, S. (2024) · Journal of Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s13353-023-00826-z · Cited by 38
Ogutu, J. O., & Piepho, H. (2014) · BMC Proceedings · doi:10.1186/1753-6561-8-s5-s7 · Cited by 37
Self-citationGuo, H., Li, Y., Xu, Y. J., Jin, Y., Xiang, J., & Chen, J. (2018) · Frontiers in Neuroinformatics · doi:10.3389/fninf.2018.00025 · Cited by 36
The utility of genomic prediction models in evolutionary genetics
McGaugh, S. E., Lorenz, A. J., & Flagel, L. (2021) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2021.0693 · Cited by 35
Competing Risks Data Analysis with High-Dimensional Covariates: An Application in Bladder Cancer
Tapak, L., Saidijam, M., Sadeghifar, M., Poorolajal, J., & Mahjub, H. (2015) · Genomics Proteomics & Bioinformatics · doi:10.1016/j.gpb.2015.04.001 · Cited by 35
Predicting academic success: machine learning analysis of student, parental, and school efforts
Jin, X. (2023) · Asia Pacific Education Review · doi:10.1007/s12564-023-09915-4 · Cited by 32
AUTALASSO: an automatic adaptive LASSO for genome-wide prediction
Waldmann, P., Ferenčaković, M., Mészáros, G., Khayatzadeh, N., Čurik, I., & Sölkner, J. (2019) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-019-2743-3 · Cited by 32
Genomic approaches to selection in outcrossing perennials: focus on essential oil crops
Kainer, D., Lanfear, R., Foley, W. J., & Külheim, C. (2015) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-015-2591-0 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Ogutu, J. O., Schulz-Streeck, T., & Piepho, H.-P.
- Affiliations
- University of Hohenheim (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Ogutu, Joseph O
- Venue
- BMC Proceedings
- Published
- 2012-05-21
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- S2
- Pages
- S10-S10
- ISSN
- 1753-6561 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3363152
- OpenAlex
- W2125459357
- Cited by
- 440
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 5.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BMC Proceedings (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (0315526)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- genomic selection, genomic breeding value prediction, regularized linear regression, ridge regression, LASSO, elastic net, adaptive LASSO, adaptive elastic net, ridge regression BLUP, SNP markers, marker selection, prediction accuracy, simulated data, plant breeding, animal breeding, high-dimensional data, cross-validation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
