Cited by 88Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesGene expression and cancer classificationStatistical Methods and Inference

Statistical workflow for feature selection in human metabolomics data

Open access
Antonelli, Joseph, Claggett, Brian L., Henglin, Mir, Kim, Andy, Ovsak, Gavin, Kim, Nicole, Deng, Katherine, Rao, Kevin +10 more·2019·Metabolites

Abstract

High-throughput metabolomics investigations, when conducted in large human cohorts, represent a potentially powerful tool for elucidating the biochemical diversity underlying human health and disease. Large-scale metabolomics data sources, generated using either targeted or nontargeted platforms, are becoming more common. Appropriate statistical analysis of these complex high-dimensional data will be critical for extracting meaningful results from such large-scale human metabolomics studies. Therefore, we consider the statistical analytical approaches that have been employed in prior human metabolomics studies. Based on the lessons learned and collective experience to date in the field, we offer a step-by-step framework for pursuing statistical analyses of cohort-based human metabolomics data, with a focus on feature selection. We discuss the range of options and approaches that may be employed at each stage of data management, analysis, and interpretation and offer guidance on the analytical decisions that need to be considered over the course of implementing a data analysis workflow. Certain pervasive analytical challenges facing the field warrant ongoing focused research. Addressing these challenges, particularly those related to analyzing human metabolomics data, will allow for more standardization of as well as advances in how research in the field is practiced. In turn, such major analytical advances will lead to substantial improvements in the overall contributions of human metabolomics investigations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/metabo9070143

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some omics types are more likely to produce sparse data than others.

    “Also, some omics are more prone to generating sparse data (e.g. in the case of metabolomics, some values might be below the limit of detection and hence assigned null value (Antonelli et al., 2019)) than others.”

    From Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Antonelli et al., 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [12]Little R.J. Rubin D.B. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data 2nd ed. Wiley Hoboken, NJ, USA 2019 Volume 793

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Antonelli, J., Claggett, B. L., Henglin, M., Kim, A., Ovsak, G., Kim, N., Deng, K., Rao, K., Tyagi, O., Watrous, J. D., Lagerborg, K. A., Hushcha, P. V., Demler, O. V., Mora, S., Niiranen, T. J., Pereira, A. C., Jain, M., & Cheng, S.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Turku (FI)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Jain, Mohit
  • Cheng, Susan
Venue
Metabolites
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-07-12
Volume
9
Issue
7
Pages
143
ISSN
2218-1989 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2959053591
Cited by
88
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Metabolites (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UTUPub (University of Turku) (submittedVersion)
  • UTUPub (University of Turku) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
  • WOS
Funders
National Institutes of Health (T32-ES007142, R01-HL134168, K01-HL135342, R01-HL134811)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
Keywords
human metabolomics, feature selection, high-dimensional data, data management, analytical standardization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review