The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
BglBricks: A flexible standard for biological part assembly
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Standard biological parts, such as BioBricks parts, provide the foundation for a new engineering discipline that enables the design and construction of synthetic biological systems with a variety of applications in bioenergy, new materials, therapeutics, and environmental remediation. Although the original BioBricks assembly standard has found widespread use, it has several shortcomings that limit its range of potential applications. In particular, the system is not suitable for the construction of protein fusions due to an unfavorable scar sequence that encodes an in-frame stop codon. RESULTS: Here, we present a similar but new composition standard, called BglBricks, that addresses the scar translation issue associated with the original standard. The new system employs BglII and BamHI restriction enzymes, robust cutters with an extensive history of use, and results in a 6-nucleotide scar sequence encoding glycine-serine, an innocuous peptide linker in most protein fusion applications. We demonstrate the utility of the new standard in three distinct applications, including the construction of constitutively active gene expression devices with a wide range of expression profiles, the construction of chimeric, multi-domain protein fusions, and the targeted integration of functional DNA sequences into specific loci of the E. coli genome. CONCLUSIONS: The BglBrick standard provides a new, more flexible platform from which to generate standard biological parts and automate DNA assembly. Work on BglBrick assembly reactions, as well as on the development of automation and bioinformatics tools, is currently underway. These tools will provide a foundation from which to transform genetic engineering from a technically intensive art into a purely design-based discipline.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Foundations for engineering biology
Endy, D. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04342 · Cited by 1,511
Cited by
A Modular Cloning System for Standardized Assembly of Multigene Constructs
Weber, E., Engler, C., Gruetzner, R., Werner, S., & Marillonnet, S. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016765 · Cited by 1,377
A Highly Characterized Yeast Toolkit for Modular, Multipart Assembly
Lee, M. E., DeLoache, W. C., Cervantes, B., & Dueber, J. E. (2015) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/sb500366v · Cited by 916
Self-citationGoldenBraid: an iterative cloning system for standardized assembly of reusable genetic modules.
Sarrion-Perdigones, A., Falconi, E. E., Zandalinas, S. I., Juárez, P., Fernández-del-Carmen, A., Granell, A., & Orzaez, D. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021622 · Cited by 348
Bricks and blueprints: methods and standards for DNA assembly.
Casini, A., Storch, M., Baldwin, G. S., & Ellis, T. (2015) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm4014 · Cited by 286
ePathBrick: A Synthetic Biology Platform for Engineering Metabolic Pathways in E. coli
Xu, P., Vansiri, A., Bhan, N., & Koffas, M. A. G. (2012) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/sb300016b · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, J. C., Dueber, J. E., Leguia, M., Wu, G. C., Goler, J. A., Arkin, A. P., & Keasling, J. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Engineering
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 1754-1611 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2028343312
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BglBricks: A flexible standard for biological part assembly. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1754-1611-4-1
- The paper
- Anderson, J. C., Dueber, J. E., Leguia, M., Wu, G. C., Goler, J. A., Arkin, A. P., & Keasling, J. D. (2010). BglBricks: A flexible standard for biological part assembly. Journal of Biological Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-1611-4-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.