Cited by 30Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Gestational diabetes and macrosomia by race/ethnicity in Hawaii

Open access
Tsai, Pai-Jong Stacy, Roberson, Emily, Dye, Timothy·2013·BMC Research Notes

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes (GDM) has been shown to have long-term sequelae for both the mother and infant. Women with GDM are at increased risk of macrosomia, which predisposes the infant to birth injuries. Previous studies noted increased rates of GDM in Asian and Pacific Islander (API) women; however, the rate of macrosomia in API women with GDM is unclear. The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between ethnicity, gestational diabetes (GDM), and macrosomia in Hawaii. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using Hawaii Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) data. Data from 2009-2011, linked with selected items from birth certificates, were used to examine GDM and macrosomia by ethnicity. SAS-callable SUDAAN 10.0 was used to generate odds ratios, point estimates and standard errors. RESULTS: Data from 4735 respondents were weighted to represent all pregnancies resulting in live births in Hawaii from 2009-2011. The overall prevalence of GDM in Hawaii was 10.9%. The highest prevalence of GDM was in Filipina (13.1%) and Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (12.1%) women. The lowest prevalence was in white women (7.4%). Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, Filipina, and other Asian women all had an increased risk of GDM compared to white women using bivariate analysis. Adjusting for obesity, age, maternal nativity, and smoking, Asian Pacific Islander (API) women, which includes Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, Filipina, and other Asian women, had a 50% increased odds of having GDM compared to white women when compared using multivariate analysis. Among women with GDM, the highest prevalence of macrosomia was in white women (14.5%) while the lowest was in Filipina (5.3%) women. CONCLUSIONS: API women in Hawaii have increased rates of GDM compared to white women. Paradoxically, this elevated GDM risk in API women is not associated with an increased rate of macrosomia. This suggests the relationship between GDM and macrosomia is more complex in this population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1756-0500-6-395

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Filipina, Pacific Islander/Hawaiian, and other Asian pregnant patients had increased risk of gestational diabetes mellitus versus White women in a bivariate analysis.

    “Filipina, Pacific Islander/Hawaiian, and other Asian pregnant patients had increased risk of GDM versus white women using a bivariate analysis [52].”
  • In Hawaii between 2009 and 2011, the pooled gestational diabetes mellitus prevalence was 10.9%, with higher rates in Filipina (13.1%) and Pacific Islander/Hawaiian (12.1%) women and the lowest rate in White women (7.4%).

    “The pooled GDM prevalence was 10.9%, but a higher incidence of GDM was confirmed in Filipina (13.1%) and Pacific Islander/Hawaiian (12.1%) pregnant women. The lowest rate of GDM was among White women (7.4%).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsai, P.-J. S., Roberson, E., & Dye, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • Hawaii Department of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Tsai, Pai-Jong Stacy
Venue
BMC Research Notes
Published
2013-10-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
395-395
ISSN
1756-0500 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052348424
Cited by
30
References
37
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
3.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Research Notes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (1U01DP003145)
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (U54MD007584)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, macrosomia, race and ethnicity, Asian/Pacific Islander women, Filipina women, GDM prevalence, birth weight, Hawaii, PRAMS
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Fetal Macrosomia, Hawaii, Humans, Pregnancy, Prevalence, Diabetes, Gestational, Racial Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review