Mobile phone brief intervention applications for risky alcohol use among university students: a randomized controlled study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Brief interventions via the internet have been shown to reduce university students' alcohol intake. This study tested two smartphone applications (apps) targeting drinking choices on party occasions, with the goal of reducing problematic alcohol intake among Swedish university students. METHODS: Students were recruited via e-mails sent to student union members at two universities. Those who gave informed consent, had a smartphone, and showed risky alcohol consumption according to the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) were randomized into three groups. Group 1 had access to the Swedish government alcohol monopoly's app, Promillekoll, offering real-time estimated blood alcohol concentration (eBAC) calculation; Group 2 had access to a web-based app, PartyPlanner, developed by the research group, offering real-time eBAC calculation with planning and follow-up functions; and Group 3 participants were controls. Follow-up was conducted at 7 weeks. RESULTS: Among 28574 students offered participation, 4823 agreed to join; 415 were excluded due to incomplete data, and 1932 fulfilled eligibility criteria for randomization. Attrition was 22.7-39.3 percent, higher among heavier drinkers and highest in Group 2. Self-reported app use was higher in Group 1 (74%) compared to Group 2 (41%). Per-protocol analyses revealed only one significant time-by-group interaction, where Group 1 participants increased the frequency of their drinking occasions compared to controls (p = 0.001). Secondary analyses by gender showed a significant difference among men in Group 1 for frequency of drinking occasions per week (p = 0.001), but not among women. Among all participants, 29 percent showed high-risk drinking, over the recommended weekly drinking levels of 9 (women) and 14 (men) standard glasses. CONCLUSIONS: Smartphone apps can make brief interventions available to large numbers of university students. The apps studied using eBAC calculation did not, however, seem to affect alcohol consumption among university students and one app may have led to a negative effect among men. Future research should: 1) explore ways to increase user retention, 2) include apps facilitating technical manipulation for evaluation of added components, 3) explore the effects of adapting app content to possible gender differences, and 4) offer additional interventions to high-risk users. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01958398.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
At 7-week follow-up, the Check your BAC group significantly increased the frequency of occasions to drink compared with the control group.
“7-week follow-up: the BAC group significantly ↑ the frequency of occasions to drink vs the control group.”
From Online and Mobile Interventions for Problem Gambling, Alcohol, and Drugs: A Systematic Review (2017) · cites this paper as Gajecki et al. (2014)
The difference in frequency of occasions to drink between the Check your BAC group and control group was significant for men only.
“This difference is significant for men only.”
From Online and Mobile Interventions for Problem Gambling, Alcohol, and Drugs: A Systematic Review (2017) · cites this paper as Gajecki et al. (2014)
Two mobile applications differ from other interventions in their theoretical approach (planned behavior) and content (behavioral tool to manage alcohol use and estimate blood alcohol levels in real time).
“Two of these applications (see Gajecki et al., 2014) differ from the other interventions in regards to their theoretical approach, that of planned behavior (Ajzen, 1991), and their content, which consisted of a behavioral tool to manage alcohol use and estimate blood alcohol levels in real time.”
From Online and Mobile Interventions for Problem Gambling, Alcohol, and Drugs: A Systematic Review (2017) · cites this paper as Gajecki et al., 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 179
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Andersson C Comparison of automated technologies to deliver brief alcohol interventions to university students Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2012 36 86A http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acer.2012.36.issue-s2/issuetoc · DOI
- Bergman H Källmén H Svenska kvinnor har fått mer riskfyllda och skadligare alkoholvanor. Undersökning av förändringar i svenskarnas alkoholvanor åren 1997–2001. [Swedish women show more hazardous and harmful alcohol habits. Investigation of changes in Swedes’ alcohol habits during the period 1997–2001] Lakartidningen 2003 100 1028 1035 12693135
- Authors
- Gajecki, M., Berman, A. H., Sinadinovic, K., Rosendahl, I., & Andersson, C.
- Affiliations
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Malmö University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Gajecki, Mikael
- Venue
- Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
- Published
- 2014-07-02
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-11
- ISSN
- 1940-0632 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-0640
- PMC
- PMC4091647
- OpenAlex
- W2121770579
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 13.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Addiction Science & Clinical Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Malmö University Publications (Malmö University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Karolinska Institutet
- Vetenskapsrådet
- Systembolaget
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Keywords
- mobile phone app, brief intervention, risky alcohol use, university students, problematic drinking, drinking frequency, gender differences, app retention
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Ethanol, Alcoholism, Counseling, Female, Humans, Male, Self Care, Software, Students, Sweden, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Internet, Intention, Cell Phone, Young Adult, Mobile Applications
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review