Cited by 179Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health Interventions

Mobile phone brief intervention applications for risky alcohol use among university students: a randomized controlled study

Open access
Gajecki, Mikael, Berman, Anne H, Sinadinovic, Kristina, Rosendahl, Ingvar, Andersson, Claes·2014·Addiction Science & Clinical Practice

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Brief interventions via the internet have been shown to reduce university students' alcohol intake. This study tested two smartphone applications (apps) targeting drinking choices on party occasions, with the goal of reducing problematic alcohol intake among Swedish university students. METHODS: Students were recruited via e-mails sent to student union members at two universities. Those who gave informed consent, had a smartphone, and showed risky alcohol consumption according to the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) were randomized into three groups. Group 1 had access to the Swedish government alcohol monopoly's app, Promillekoll, offering real-time estimated blood alcohol concentration (eBAC) calculation; Group 2 had access to a web-based app, PartyPlanner, developed by the research group, offering real-time eBAC calculation with planning and follow-up functions; and Group 3 participants were controls. Follow-up was conducted at 7 weeks. RESULTS: Among 28574 students offered participation, 4823 agreed to join; 415 were excluded due to incomplete data, and 1932 fulfilled eligibility criteria for randomization. Attrition was 22.7-39.3 percent, higher among heavier drinkers and highest in Group 2. Self-reported app use was higher in Group 1 (74%) compared to Group 2 (41%). Per-protocol analyses revealed only one significant time-by-group interaction, where Group 1 participants increased the frequency of their drinking occasions compared to controls (p = 0.001). Secondary analyses by gender showed a significant difference among men in Group 1 for frequency of drinking occasions per week (p = 0.001), but not among women. Among all participants, 29 percent showed high-risk drinking, over the recommended weekly drinking levels of 9 (women) and 14 (men) standard glasses. CONCLUSIONS: Smartphone apps can make brief interventions available to large numbers of university students. The apps studied using eBAC calculation did not, however, seem to affect alcohol consumption among university students and one app may have led to a negative effect among men. Future research should: 1) explore ways to increase user retention, 2) include apps facilitating technical manipulation for evaluation of added components, 3) explore the effects of adapting app content to possible gender differences, and 4) offer additional interventions to high-risk users. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01958398.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1940-0640-9-11

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At 7-week follow-up, the Check your BAC group significantly increased the frequency of occasions to drink compared with the control group.

    “7-week follow-up: the BAC group significantly ↑ the frequency of occasions to drink vs the control group.”
  • The difference in frequency of occasions to drink between the Check your BAC group and control group was significant for men only.

    “This difference is significant for men only.”
  • Two mobile applications differ from other interventions in their theoretical approach (planned behavior) and content (behavioral tool to manage alcohol use and estimate blood alcohol levels in real time).

    “Two of these applications (see Gajecki et al., 2014) differ from the other interventions in regards to their theoretical approach, that of planned behavior (Ajzen, 1991), and their content, which consisted of a behavioral tool to manage alcohol use and estimate blood alcohol levels in real time.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 179

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Andersson C Comparison of automated technologies to deliver brief alcohol interventions to university students Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2012 36 86A http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acer.2012.36.issue-s2/issuetoc · DOI
  2. Bergman H Källmén H Svenska kvinnor har fått mer riskfyllda och skadligare alkoholvanor. Undersökning av förändringar i svenskarnas alkoholvanor åren 1997–2001. [Swedish women show more hazardous and harmful alcohol habits. Investigation of changes in Swedes’ alcohol habits during the period 1997–2001] Lakartidningen 2003 100 1028 1035 12693135

Authors
Gajecki, M., Berman, A. H., Sinadinovic, K., Rosendahl, I., & Andersson, C.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Malmö University (SE)
Corresponding author
Gajecki, Mikael
Venue
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
Published
2014-07-02
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
11-11
ISSN
  • 1940-0632 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-0640
OpenAlex
W2121770579
Cited by
179
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 1
FWCI
13.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Addiction Science & Clinical Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Malmö University Publications (Malmö University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Systembolaget
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
mobile phone app, brief intervention, risky alcohol use, university students, problematic drinking, drinking frequency, gender differences, app retention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Ethanol, Alcoholism, Counseling, Female, Humans, Male, Self Care, Software, Students, Sweden, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Internet, Intention, Cell Phone, Young Adult, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review