The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What are ‘Integrated Landscape Approaches’ and how effectively have they been implemented in the tropics: a systematic map protocol
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Systematic reviews typically screen the first 50 to 100 search records within Google Scholar e.g. [18,19,20], sometimes restricting searches to title rather than full-text searches e.g. [21].”
From The role of google scholar in evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching (2015) · cites this paper as [18]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People
Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M., & Toulmin, C. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1185383 · Cited by 11,943
Solutions for a cultivated planet
Foley, J. A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K. A., Cassidy, E. S., Gerber, J. S., Johnston, M., Mueller, N. D., O’Connell, C., Ray, D. K., West, P. C., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10452 · Cited by 8,476
Edwards, P., Clarke, M., DiGuiseppi, C., Pratap, S., Roberts, I., & Wentz, R. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1190 · Cited by 340
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- 10.1016/j.tree.2013.12.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.068 · DOI
- 10.1186/2048-7010-1-12 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1210595110 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/conl.12066 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00575.x · DOI
- 10.2307/1309350 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1015633830223 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.04.038 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01467.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.03.002 · DOI
- 10.1186/2047-2382-2-5 · DOI
- 10.1177/001316446002000104 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/2047-2382-3-6 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The role of google scholar in evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching
Haddaway, N. R., Collins, A. M., Coughlin, D., & Kirk, S. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138237 · Cited by 2,387
A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences
James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016) · Environmental Evidence · doi:10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6 · Cited by 769
Metadata
- Authors
- Reed, J., Deakin, L., & Sunderland, T.
- Venue
- Environmental Evidence
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2
- ISSN
- 2047-2382
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What are ‘Integrated Landscape Approaches’ and how effectively have they been implemented in the tropics: a systematic map protocol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/2047-2382-4-2
- The paper
- Reed, J., Deakin, L., & Sunderland, T. (2015). What are ‘Integrated Landscape Approaches’ and how effectively have they been implemented in the tropics: a systematic map protocol. Environmental Evidence. https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-2382-4-2
