The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High resolution genomic analysis of sporadic breast cancer using array-based comparative genomic hybridization
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Genomic aberrations in the form of subchromosomal DNA copy number changes are a hallmark of epithelial cancers, including breast cancer. The goal of the present study was to analyze such aberrations in breast cancer at high resolution. Methods: We employed high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization with 4,134 bacterial artificial chromosomes that cover the genome at 0.9 megabase resolution to analyze 47 primary breast tumors and 18 breast cancer cell lines. Results: Common amplicons included 8q24.3 (amplified in 79% of tumors, with 5/47 exhibiting high level amplification), 1q32.1 and 16p13.3 (amplified in 66% and 57% of tumors, respectively). Moreover, we found several positive correlations between specific amplicons from different chromosomes, suggesting the existence of cooperating genetic loci. Queried by gene, the most frequently amplified kinase was PTK2 (79% of tumors), whereas the most frequently lost kinase was PTK2B (hemizygous loss in 34% of tumors). Amplification of ERBB2 as measured by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) correlated closely with ERBB2 DNA and RNA levels measured by quantitative PCR as well as with ERBB2 protein levels. The overall frequency of recurrent losses was lower, with no region lost in more than 50% of tumors; the most frequently lost tumor suppressor gene was RB1 (hemizygous loss in 26% of tumors). Finally, we find that specific copy number changes in cell lines closely mimicked those in primary tumors, with an overall Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.843 for gains and 0.734 for losses. Conclusion: High resolution CGH analysis of breast cancer reveals several regions where DNA copy number is commonly gained or lost, that non-random correlations between specific amplicons exist, and that specific genetic alterations are maintained in breast cancer cell lines despite repeat passage in tissue culture. These observations suggest that genes within these regions are critical to the malignant phenotype and may thus serve as future therapeutic targets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lynch, T. J., Bell, D. W., Sordella, R., Gurubhagavatula, S., Okimoto, R. A., Brannigan, B. W., Harris, P. L., Haserlat, S. M., Supko, J. G., Haluska, F. G., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa040938 · Cited by 11,486
Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer
van 't Veer, L. J., Dai, H., van de Vijver, M. J., He, Y. D., Hart, A. A. M., Mao, M., Peterse, H. L., van der Kooy, K., Marton, M. J., Witteveen, A. T., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415530a · Cited by 9,536
EGFR Mutations in Lung Cancer: Correlation with Clinical Response to Gefitinib Therapy
Paez, J. G., Jänne, P. A., Lee, J. C., Tracy, S., Greulich, H., Gabriel, S., Herman, P., Kaye, F. J., Lindeman, N., Boggon, T. J., et al. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1099314 · Cited by 9,368
A census of human cancer genes
Futreal, P. A., Coin, L., Marshall, M., Down, T., Hubbard, T., Wooster, R., Rahman, N., & Stratton, M. R. (2004) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1299 · Cited by 3,184
Genome scanning with array CGH delineates regional alterations in mouse islet carcinomas
Hodgson, G., Hager, J. H., Volik, S., Hariono, S., Wernick, M., Moore, D., Albertson, D. G., Pinkel, D., Collins, C., Hanahan, D., et al. (2001) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng771 · Cited by 294
Cited by
Roles of p53, MYC and HIF-1 in regulating glycolysis–the seventh hallmark of cancer
Yeung, S. J., Pan, J., & Lee, M.-H. (2008) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-008-8224-x · Cited by 514
Phosphoinositide signalling in cancer: beyond PI3K and PTEN
Bunney, T. D., & Katan, M. (2010) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2842 · Cited by 400
Upadhyay, G., Yin, Y., Yuan, H., Li, X., Derynck, R., & Glazer, R. I. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1103441108 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Naylor, T. L., Greshock, J., Wang, Y., Colligon, T., Yu, Q., Clemmer, V., Zaks, T. Z., & Weber, B. L.
- Venue
- Breast Cancer Research
- Published
- 2005-11-24
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- R1186-98
- ISSN
- 1465-5411 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-542X
- OpenAlex
- W2115604365
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 7.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High resolution genomic analysis of sporadic breast cancer using array-based comparative genomic hybridization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/bcr1356
- The paper
- Naylor, T. L., Greshock, J., Wang, Y., Colligon, T., Yu, Q., Clemmer, V., Zaks, T. Z., & Weber, B. L. (2005). High resolution genomic analysis of sporadic breast cancer using array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Breast Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr1356
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.