The DOI matches its Crossref record.
BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a population-based study of male breast cancer
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The contribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 to the incidence of male breast cancer (MBC) in the United Kingdom is not known, and the importance of these genes in the increased risk of female breast cancer associated with a family history of breast cancer in a male first-degree relative is unclear. METHODS: We have carried out a population-based study of 94 MBC cases collected in the UK. We screened genomic DNA for mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 and used family history data from these cases to calculate the risk of breast cancer to female relatives of MBC cases. We also estimated the contribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 to this risk. RESULTS: Nineteen cases (20%) reported a first-degree relative with breast cancer, of whom seven also had an affected second-degree relative. The breast cancer risk in female first-degree relatives was 2.4 times (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.4-4.0) the risk in the general population. No BRCA1 mutation carriers were identified and five cases were found to carry a mutation in BRCA2. Allowing for a mutation detection sensitivity frequency of 70%, the carrier frequency for BRCA2 mutations was 8% (95% CI = 3-19). All the mutation carriers had a family history of breast, ovarian, prostate or pancreatic cancer. However, BRCA2 accounted for only 15% of the excess familial risk of breast cancer in female first-degree relatives. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that other genes that confer an increased risk for both female and male breast cancer have yet to be found.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Antoniou, A., Pharoah, P. D. P., Narod, S., Risch, H. A., Eyfjord, J. E., Hopper, J. L., Loman, N., Olsson, H., Johannsson, O., Borg, Å., et al. (2003) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/375033 · Cited by 3,680
Self-citationDaly, M. B., Pal, T., Berry, M. P., Buys, S. S., Dickson, P., Domchek, S. M., Elkhanany, A., Friedman, S., Goggins, M., Hutton, M. L., et al. (2021) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2021.0001 · Cited by 1,112
Fentiman, I. S., Fourquet, A., & Hortobagyi, G. N. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68226-3 · Cited by 744
Epidemiology of Male Breast Cancer
Weiss, J. R., Moysich, K. B., & Swede, H. (2005) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.20.14.1 · Cited by 328
Rosen, E. M., Fan, S., Pestell, R. G., & Goldberg, I. D. (2003) · Journal of Cellular Physiology · doi:10.1002/jcp.10257 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Basham, V. M., Lipscombe, J. M., Ward, J. M., Gayther, S. A., Ponder, B. A., Easton, D. F., & Pharoah, P. D.
- Venue
- Breast Cancer Research
- Published
- 2001-11-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- R2-R2
- ISSN
- 1465-5411 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-542X
- OpenAlex
- W1529599357
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a population-based study of male breast cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/bcr419
- The paper
- Basham, V. M., Lipscombe, J. M., Ward, J. M., Gayther, S. A., Ponder, B. A., Easton, D. F., & Pharoah, P. D. (2001). BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a population-based study of male breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr419
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.