Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 182

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical outcomes of patients requiring ventilatory support in Brazilian intensive care units: a multicenter, prospective, cohort study

Open access
Azevedo, Luciano CP, Park, Marcelo, Salluh, Jorge IF, Rea-Neto, Alvaro, Souza-Dantas, Vicente C, Varaschin, Pedro, Oliveira, Mirella C, Tierno, Paulo Fernando GMM, dal-Pizzol, Felipe, Silva, Ulysses VA, Knibel, Marcos, Nassar, Antonio P, Alves, Rossine A, Ferreira, Juliana C, Teixeira, Cassiano, Rezende, Valeria, Martinez, Amadeu, Luciano, Paula M, Schettino, Guilherme, Soares, Marcio, The ERICC (Epidemiology of Respiratory Insufficiency in Critical Care) investigators·2013·Critical Care

Abstract

Introduction: Contemporary information on mechanical ventilation (MV) use in emerging countries is limited. Moreover, most epidemiological studies on ventilatory support were carried out before significant developments, such as lung protective ventilation or broader application of non-invasive ventilation (NIV). We aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics, outcomes and risk factors for hospital mortality and failure of NIV in patients requiring ventilatory support in Brazilian intensive care units (ICU). Methods: In a multicenter, prospective, cohort study, a total of 773 adult patients admitted to 45 ICUs over a two-month period requiring invasive ventilation or NIV for more than 24 hours were evaluated. Causes of ventilatory support, prior chronic health status and physiological data were assessed. Multivariate analysis was used to identifiy variables associated with hospital mortality and NIV failure. Results: Invasive MV and NIV were used as initial ventilatory support in 622 (80%) and 151 (20%) patients. Failure with subsequent intubation occurred in 54% of NIV patients. The main reasons for ventilatory support were pneumonia (27%), neurologic disorders (19%) and non-pulmonary sepsis (12%). ICU and hospital mortality rates were 34% and 42%. Using the Berlin definition, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was diagnosed in 31% of the patients with a hospital mortality of 52%. In the multivariate analysis, age (odds ratio (OR), 1.03; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01 to 1.03), comorbidities (OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.28 to 3.17), associated organ failures (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.20), moderate (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.10 to 3.35) to severe ARDS (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.01 to 4.41), cumulative fluid balance over the first 72 h of ICU (OR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.39 to 4.28), higher lactate (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.27 to 2.50), invasive MV (OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.32 to 5.39) and NIV failure (OR, 3.95; 95% CI, 1.74 to 8.99) were independently associated with hospital mortality. The predictors of NIV failure were the severity of associated organ dysfunctions (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.34), ARDS (OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.10 to 4.82) and positive fluid balance (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.02 to 4.30). Conclusions: Current mortality of ventilated patients in Brazil is elevated. Implementation of judicious fluid therapy and a watchful use and monitoring of NIV patients are potential targets to improve outcomes in this setting. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01268410.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/cc12594

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 182

Metadata

Authors
Azevedo, L. C., Park, M., Salluh, J. I., Rea-Neto, A., Souza-Dantas, V. C., Varaschin, P., Oliveira, M. C., Tierno, P. F. G., dal-Pizzol, F., Silva, U. V., Knibel, M., Nassar, A. P., Alves, R. A., Ferreira, J. C., Teixeira, C., Rezende, V., Martinez, A., Luciano, P. M., Schettino, G., Soares, M., & The ERICC (Epidemiology of Respiratory Insufficiency in Critical Care) investigators
Venue
Critical Care
Published
2013-04-04
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
R63-R63
ISSN
1364-8535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980617754
Cited by
182
References
8
FWCI
12.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical outcomes of patients requiring ventilatory support in Brazilian intensive care units: a multicenter, prospective, cohort study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/cc12594
The paper
Azevedo, L. C., Park, M., Salluh, J. I., Rea-Neto, A., Souza-Dantas, V. C., Varaschin, P., Oliveira, M. C., Tierno, P. F. G., dal-Pizzol, F., Silva, U. V., Knibel, M., Nassar, A. P., Alves, R. A., Ferreira, J. C., Teixeira, C., Rezende, V., Martinez, A., Luciano, P. M., Schettino, G., . . . The ERICC (Epidemiology of Respiratory Insufficiency in Critical Care) investigators. (2013). Clinical outcomes of patients requiring ventilatory support in Brazilian intensive care units: a multicenter, prospective, cohort study. Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12594

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.