The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical outcomes of patients requiring ventilatory support in Brazilian intensive care units: a multicenter, prospective, cohort study
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Contemporary information on mechanical ventilation (MV) use in emerging countries is limited. Moreover, most epidemiological studies on ventilatory support were carried out before significant developments, such as lung protective ventilation or broader application of non-invasive ventilation (NIV). We aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics, outcomes and risk factors for hospital mortality and failure of NIV in patients requiring ventilatory support in Brazilian intensive care units (ICU). Methods: In a multicenter, prospective, cohort study, a total of 773 adult patients admitted to 45 ICUs over a two-month period requiring invasive ventilation or NIV for more than 24 hours were evaluated. Causes of ventilatory support, prior chronic health status and physiological data were assessed. Multivariate analysis was used to identifiy variables associated with hospital mortality and NIV failure. Results: Invasive MV and NIV were used as initial ventilatory support in 622 (80%) and 151 (20%) patients. Failure with subsequent intubation occurred in 54% of NIV patients. The main reasons for ventilatory support were pneumonia (27%), neurologic disorders (19%) and non-pulmonary sepsis (12%). ICU and hospital mortality rates were 34% and 42%. Using the Berlin definition, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was diagnosed in 31% of the patients with a hospital mortality of 52%. In the multivariate analysis, age (odds ratio (OR), 1.03; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01 to 1.03), comorbidities (OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.28 to 3.17), associated organ failures (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.20), moderate (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.10 to 3.35) to severe ARDS (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.01 to 4.41), cumulative fluid balance over the first 72 h of ICU (OR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.39 to 4.28), higher lactate (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.27 to 2.50), invasive MV (OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.32 to 5.39) and NIV failure (OR, 3.95; 95% CI, 1.74 to 8.99) were independently associated with hospital mortality. The predictors of NIV failure were the severity of associated organ dysfunctions (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.34), ARDS (OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.10 to 4.82) and positive fluid balance (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.02 to 4.30). Conclusions: Current mortality of ventilated patients in Brazil is elevated. Implementation of judicious fluid therapy and a watchful use and monitoring of NIV patients are potential targets to improve outcomes in this setting. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01268410.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000) · doi:10.1002/0471722146 · Cited by 20,302
(2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200005043421801 · Cited by 12,941
Vincent, J. L., Moreno, R., Takala, J., Willatts, S., De Mendonça, A., Bruining, H., Reinhart, C. K., Suter, P. M., & Thijs, L. G. (1996) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf01709751 · Cited by 11,674
Bernard, G. R., Artigas, A., Brigham, K. L., Carlet, J., Falke, K., Hudson, L., Lamy, M., Legall, J. R., Morris, A., & Spragg, R. (1994) · American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.149.3.7509706 · Cited by 6,746
Effect of a protective-ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Amato, M. B. P., Barbas, C. S. V., Medeiros, D. M., Magaldi, R. B., Schettino, G. P., Lorenzi-Filho, G., Kairalla, R. A., Deheinzelin, D., Munoz, C., Oliveira, R., et al. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199802053380602 · Cited by 3,654
Self-citationComparison of Two Fluid-Management Strategies in Acute Lung Injury
(2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa062200 · Cited by 3,538
Serpa Neto, A., Cardoso, S. O., Manetta, J. A., Pereira, V. G. M., Espósito, D. C., Pasqualucci, M. D. O. P., Damasceno, M. C. T., & Schultz, M. J. (2012) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2012.13730 · Cited by 843
Cardoso, L. T., Grion, C. M., Matsuo, T., Anami, E. H., Kauss, I. A., Seko, L., & Bonametti, A. M. (2011) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc9975 · Cited by 461
Cited by
Ranzani, O. T., Bastos, L. S. L., Gelli, J. G. M., Marchesi, J. F., Baião, F., Hamacher, S., & Bozza, F. A. (2021) · The Lancet Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30560-9 · Cited by 513
Metadata
- Authors
- Azevedo, L. C., Park, M., Salluh, J. I., Rea-Neto, A., Souza-Dantas, V. C., Varaschin, P., Oliveira, M. C., Tierno, P. F. G., dal-Pizzol, F., Silva, U. V., Knibel, M., Nassar, A. P., Alves, R. A., Ferreira, J. C., Teixeira, C., Rezende, V., Martinez, A., Luciano, P. M., Schettino, G., Soares, M., & The ERICC (Epidemiology of Respiratory Insufficiency in Critical Care) investigators
- Venue
- Critical Care
- Published
- 2013-04-04
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- R63-R63
- ISSN
- 1364-8535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1980617754
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 12.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical outcomes of patients requiring ventilatory support in Brazilian intensive care units: a multicenter, prospective, cohort study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/cc12594
- The paper
- Azevedo, L. C., Park, M., Salluh, J. I., Rea-Neto, A., Souza-Dantas, V. C., Varaschin, P., Oliveira, M. C., Tierno, P. F. G., dal-Pizzol, F., Silva, U. V., Knibel, M., Nassar, A. P., Alves, R. A., Ferreira, J. C., Teixeira, C., Rezende, V., Martinez, A., Luciano, P. M., Schettino, G., . . . The ERICC (Epidemiology of Respiratory Insufficiency in Critical Care) investigators. (2013). Clinical outcomes of patients requiring ventilatory support in Brazilian intensive care units: a multicenter, prospective, cohort study. Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12594
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.