The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Usefulness of procalcitonin for diagnosis of sepsis in the intensive care unit
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: The diagnosis of sepsis in critically ill patients is challenging because traditional markers of infection are often misleading. The present study was conducted to determine the procalcitonin level at early diagnosis (and differentiation) in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and sepsis, in comparison with C-reactive protein, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8 and tumour necrosis factor-α. Method: Thirty-three intensive care unit patients were diagnosed with SIRS, sepsis or septic shock, in accordance with the American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine consensus criteria. Blood samples were taken at the first and second day of hospitalization, and on the day of discharge or on the day of death. For multiple group comparisons one-way analysis of variance was applied, with post hoc comparison. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of PCT and each cytokine studied were calculated. Results: PCT, IL-2 and IL-8 levels increased in parallel with the severity of the clinical condition of the patient. PCT exhibited a greatest sensitivity (85%) and specificity (91%) in differentiating patients with SIRS from those with sepsis. With respect to positive and negative predictive values, PCT markedly exceeded other variables. Discussion: In the present study PCT was found to be a more accurate diagnostic parameter for differentiating SIRS and sepsis, and therefore daily determinations of PCT may be helpful in the follow up of critically ill patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pierrakos, C., & Vincent, J.-L. (2010) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc8872 · Cited by 1,377
Procalcitonin as a diagnostic marker for sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wacker, C., Prkno, A., Brunkhorst, F. M., & Schlattmann, P. (2013) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(12)70323-7 · Cited by 1,198
Tang, B. M., Eslick, G. D., Craig, J. C., & McLean, A. S. (2007) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(07)70052-x · Cited by 851
Becker, K. L., Snider, R., & Nylen, E. S. (2008) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e318165babb · Cited by 598
Qu, R., Ji, Y., Ling, Y., Ye, C.-Y., Yang, S.-M., Liu, Y.-Y., Yang, R.-Y., Luo, Y.-F., & Guo, Z. (2012) · Saudi Medical Journal · doi:10.15537/1658-3175.5525 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Balci, C., Sungurtekin, H., Gürses, E., Sungurtekin, U., & Kaptanoğlu, B.
- Venue
- Critical Care
- Published
- 2002-10-30
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 85-90
- ISSN
- 1364-8535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1579475342
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Usefulness of procalcitonin for diagnosis of sepsis in the intensive care unit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/cc1843
- The paper
- Balci, C., Sungurtekin, H., Gürses, E., Sungurtekin, U., & Kaptanoğlu, B. (2002). Usefulness of procalcitonin for diagnosis of sepsis in the intensive care unit. Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc1843
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.