The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computational analysis of core promoters in the Drosophila genome
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The core promoter, a region of about 100 base-pairs flanking the transcription start site (TSS), serves as the recognition site for the basal transcription apparatus. Drosophila TSSs have generally been mapped by individual experiments; the low number of accurately mapped TSSs has limited analysis of promoter sequence motifs and the training of computational prediction tools. RESULTS: We identified TSS candidates for about 2,000 Drosophila genes by aligning 5' expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from cap-trapped cDNA libraries to the genome, while applying stringent criteria concerning coverage and 5'-end distribution. Examination of the sequences flanking these TSSs revealed the presence of well-known core promoter motifs such as the TATA box, the initiator and the downstream promoter element (DPE). We also define, and assess the distribution of, several new motifs prevalent in core promoters, including what appears to be a variant DPE motif. Among the prevalent motifs is the DNA-replication-related element DRE, recently shown to be part of the recognition site for the TBP-related factor TRF2. Our TSS set was then used to retrain the computational promoter predictor McPromoter, allowing us to improve the recognition performance to over 50% sensitivity and 40% specificity. We compare these computational results to promoter prediction in vertebrates. CONCLUSIONS: There are relatively few recognizable binding sites for previously known general transcription factors in Drosophila core promoters. However, we identified several new motifs enriched in promoter regions. We were also able to significantly improve the performance of computational TSS prediction in Drosophila.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory
Bird, A. (2002) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.947102 · Cited by 7,124
Cited by
A high-resolution map of active promoters in the human genome
Kim, T. H., Barrera, L. O., Zheng, M., Qu, C., Singer, M. A., Richmond, T. A., Wu, Y., Green, R. D., & Ren, B. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03877 · Cited by 938
The BDGP Gene Disruption Project
Bellen, H. J., Levis, R. W., Liao, G., He, Y., Carlson, J. W., Tsang, G., Evans-Holm, M., Hiesinger, P. R., Schulze, K. L., Rubin, G. M., et al. (2004) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.104.026427 · Cited by 873
Self-citationEukaryotic core promoters and the functional basis of transcription initiation
Haberle, V., & Stark, A. (2018) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-018-0028-8 · Cited by 774
Regulation of gene expression via the core promoter and the basal transcriptional machinery
Juven-Gershon, T., & Kadonaga, J. T. (2010) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.08.009 · Cited by 490
Enhancer–core-promoter specificity separates developmental and housekeeping gene regulation
Zabidi, M. A., Arnold, C. D., Schernhuber, K., Pagani, M., Rath, M., Frank, O., & Stark, A. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13994 · Cited by 471
Metadata
- Authors
- Ohler, U., Liao, G.-C., Niemann, H., & Rubin, G. M.
- Venue
- Genome Biology
- Published
- 2002-12-20
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- RESEARCH0087-RESEARCH0087
- ISSN
- 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-760X
- OpenAlex
- W2097353028
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computational analysis of core promoters in the Drosophila genome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/gb-2002-3-12-research0087
- The paper
- Ohler, U., Liao, G.-C., Niemann, H., & Rubin, G. M. (2002). Computational analysis of core promoters in the Drosophila genome. Genome Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2002-3-12-research0087
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.