The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The BDGP Gene Disruption Project
Open accessAbstract
The Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project (BDGP) strives to disrupt each Drosophila gene by the insertion of a single transposable element. As part of this effort, transposons in >30,000 fly strains were localized and analyzed relative to predicted Drosophila gene structures. Approximately 6300 lines that maximize genomic coverage were selected to be sent to the Bloomington Stock Center for public distribution, bringing the size of the BDGP gene disruption collection to 7140 lines. It now includes individual lines predicted to disrupt 5362 of the 13,666 currently annotated Drosophila genes (39%). Other lines contain an insertion at least 2 kb from others in the collection and likely mutate additional incompletely annotated or uncharacterized genes and chromosomal regulatory elements. The remaining strains contain insertions likely to disrupt alternative gene promoters or to allow gene misexpression. The expanded BDGP gene disruption collection provides a public resource that will facilitate the application of Drosophila genetics to diverse biological problems. Finally, the project reveals new insight into how transposons interact with a eukaryotic genome and helps define optimal strategies for using insertional mutagenesis as a genomic tool.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Vandesompele, J., De Preter, K., Pattyn, F., Poppe, B., Van Roy, N., De Paepe, A., & Speleman, F. (2002) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034 · Cited by 20,038
Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes
Brand, A. H., & Perrimon, N. (1993) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.118.2.401 · Cited by 9,612
Base-Calling of Automated Sequencer Traces Using Phred. I. Accuracy Assessment
Ewing, B., Hillier, L., Wendl, M. C., & Green, P. (1998) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.8.3.175 · Cited by 6,967
The Genome Sequence of Drosophila melanogaster
Adams, M. D., Celniker, S. E., Holt, R. A., Evans, C. A., Gocayne, J. D., Amanatides, P. G., Scherer, S. E., Li, P. W., Hoskins, R. A., Galle, R. F., et al. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5461.2185 · Cited by 5,929
Self-citationBase-Calling of Automated Sequencer Traces Using Phred. II. Error Probabilities
Ewing, B., & Green, P. (1998) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.8.3.186 · Cited by 5,439
Genome-Wide Insertional Mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana
Alonso, J. M., Stepanova, A. N., Leisse, T. J., Kim, C. J., Chen, H., Shinn, P., Stevenson, D. K., Zimmerman, J., Barajas, P., Cheuk, R., et al. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1086391 · Cited by 5,102
Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome
Giaever, G., Chu, A. M., Ni, L., Connelly, C., Riles, L., Véronneau, S., Dow, S., Lucau-Danila, A., Anderson, K., André, B., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00935 · Cited by 4,316
Brennecke, J., Hipfner, D. R., Stark, A., Russell, R. B., & Cohen, S. M. (2003) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00231-9 · Cited by 2,042
Spradling, A. C., Stern, D., Beaton, A., Rhem, E. J., Laverty, T., Mozden, N., Misra, S., & Rubin, G. M. (1999) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/153.1.135 · Cited by 778
Self-citation
Cited by
Verstreken, P., Ly, C. V., Venken, K. J. T., Koh, T.-W., Zhou, Y., & Bellen, H. J. (2005) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.06.018 · Cited by 841
Self-citationHuang, W., Massouras, A., Inoue, Y., Peiffer, J., Ràmia, M., Tarone, A. M., Turlapati, L., Zichner, T., Zhu, D., Lyman, R. F., et al. (2014) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.171546.113 · Cited by 661
A Neural Circuit Mechanism Integrating Motivational State with Memory Expression in Drosophila
Krashes, M. J., DasGupta, S., Vreede, A., White, B., Armstrong, J. D., & Waddell, S. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.08.035 · Cited by 598
Secretion of Wnt Ligands Requires Evi, a Conserved Transmembrane Protein
Bartscherer, K., Pelte, N., Ingelfinger, D., & Boutros, M. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.04.009 · Cited by 580
The ribosomal protein genes and Minute loci of Drosophila melanogaster
Marygold, S. J., Roote, J., Reuter, G., Lambertsson, A., Ashburner, M., Millburn, G. H., Harrison, P. M., Yu, Z., Kenmochi, N., Kaufman, T. C., et al. (2007) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2007-8-10-r216 · Cited by 385
Metadata
- Authors
- Bellen, H. J., Levis, R. W., Liao, G., He, Y., Carlson, J. W., Tsang, G., Evans-Holm, M., Hiesinger, P. R., Schulze, K. L., Rubin, G. M., Hoskins, R. A., & Spradling, A. C.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-06-01
- Volume
- 167
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 761-781
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2100270425
- Cited by
- 873
- References
- 79
- FWCI
- 63.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The BDGP Gene Disruption Project. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1534/genetics.104.026427
- The paper
- Bellen, H. J., Levis, R. W., Liao, G., He, Y., Carlson, J. W., Tsang, G., Evans-Holm, M., Hiesinger, P. R., Schulze, K. L., Rubin, G. M., Hoskins, R. A., & Spradling, A. C. (2004). The BDGP Gene Disruption Project. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.104.026427
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
