The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification of conserved gene structures and carboxy-terminal motifs in the Myb gene family of Arabidopsis and Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Myb proteins contain a conserved DNA-binding domain composed of one to four repeat motifs (referred to as R0R1R2R3); each repeat is approximately 50 amino acids in length, with regularly spaced tryptophan residues. Although the Myb proteins comprise one of the largest families of transcription factors in plants, little is known about the functions of most Myb genes. Here we use computational techniques to classify Myb genes on the basis of sequence similarity and gene structure, and to identify possible functional relationships among subgroups of Myb genes from Arabidopsis and rice (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica). RESULTS: This study analyzed 130 Myb genes from Arabidopsis and 85 from rice. The collected Myb proteins were clustered into subgroups based on sequence similarity and phylogeny. Interestingly, the exon-intron structure differed between subgroups, but was conserved in the same subgroup. Moreover, the Myb domains contained a significant excess of phase 1 and 2 introns, as well as an excess of nonsymmetric exons. Conserved motifs were detected in carboxy-terminal coding regions of Myb genes within subgroups. In contrast, no common regulatory motifs were identified in the noncoding regions. Additionally, some Myb genes with similar functions were clustered in the same subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: The distribution of introns in the phylogenetic tree suggests that Myb domains originally were compact in size; introns were inserted and the splicing sites conserved during evolution. Conserved motifs identified in the carboxy-terminal regions are specific for Myb genes, and the identified Myb gene subgroups may reflect functional conservation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rogozin, I. B., Wolf, Y. I., Sorokin, A. V., Mirkin, B. G., & Koonin, E. V. (2003) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00558-x · Cited by 445
Cited by
MYB transcription factors in Arabidopsis
Dubos, C., Stracke, R., Grotewold, E., Weisshaar, B., Martin, C., & Lepiniec, L. (2010) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2010.06.005 · Cited by 4,865
Yanhui, C., Xiaoyuan, Y., Kun, H., Meihua, L., Jigang, L., Zhaofeng, G., Zhiqiang, L., Yunfei, Z., Xiaoxiao, W., Xiaoming, Q., et al. (2006) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-005-2910-y · Cited by 992
Mehrtens, F., Kranz, H., Bednarek, P., & Weisshaar, B. (2005) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.104.058032 · Cited by 831
Genome-wide analysis of the MYB transcription factor superfamily in soybean
Du, H., Yang, S.-S., Liang, Z., Feng, B.-R., Liu, L., Huang, Y.-B., & Tang, Y.-X. (2012) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2229-12-106 · Cited by 469
Quattrocchio, F., Verweij, W., Kroon, A., Spelt, C., Mol, J., & Koes, R. (2006) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.105.034041 · Cited by 401
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiang, C., Gu, X., & Peterson, T.
- Venue
- Genome Biology
- Published
- 2004-06-29
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- R46-R46
- ISSN
- 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-760X
- OpenAlex
- W2114064585
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of conserved gene structures and carboxy-terminal motifs in the Myb gene family of Arabidopsis and Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/gb-2004-5-7-r46
- The paper
- Jiang, C., Gu, X., & Peterson, T. (2004). Identification of conserved gene structures and carboxy-terminal motifs in the Myb gene family of Arabidopsis and Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica. Genome Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2004-5-7-r46
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.