The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis of the platypus genome suggests a transposon origin for mammalian imprinting
Open accessAbstract
Background: Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic phenomenon that results in monoallelic gene expression. Many hypotheses have been advanced to explain why genomic imprinting evolved in mammals, but few have examined how it arose. The host defence hypothesis suggests that imprinting evolved from existing mechanisms within the cell that act to silence foreign DNA elements that insert into the genome. However, the changes to the mammalian genome that accompanied the evolution of imprinting have been hard to define due to the absence of large scale genomic resources between all extant classes. The recent release of the platypus genome has provided the first opportunity to perform comparisons between prototherian (monotreme; which appear to lack imprinting) and therian (marsupial and eutherian; which have imprinting) mammals. Results: We compared the distribution of repeat elements known to attract epigenetic silencing across the entire genome from monotremes and therian mammals, particularly focusing on the orthologous imprinted regions. There is a significant accumulation of certain repeat elements within imprinted regions of therian mammals compared to the platypus. Conclusions: Our analyses show that the platypus has significantly fewer repeats of certain classes in the regions of the genome that have become imprinted in therian mammals. The accumulation of repeats, especially long terminal repeats and DNA elements, in therian imprinted genes and gene clusters is coincident with, and may have been a potential driving force in, the development of mammalian genomic imprinting. These data provide strong support for the host defence hypothesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LAGAN and Multi-LAGAN: Efficient tools for large-scale multiple alignment of genomic DNA
Brudno, M., Do, C. B., Cooper, G. M., Kim, M. F., Davydov, E., Program, N. C. S., Green, E. D., Sidow, A., & Batzoglou, S. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.926603 · Cited by 1,115
Genome analysis of the platypus reveals unique signatures of evolution
paper, A. L. O. A. A. T. A. A. A. T. E. O. T. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06936 · Cited by 719 · cited 4×
“Repeat distribution across the entire genome and in orthologous imprinted regions We then examined the distribution of repeat elements known to attract silencing by host defence mechanisms (long interspersed nuclear element, short interspersed nuclear elements (SINEs), long terminal repeats (LTRs), low complexity and…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEdwards, C. A., Rens, W., Clarke, O., Mungall, A. J., Hore, T., Graves, J. A. M., Dunham, I., Ferguson-Smith, A. C., & Ferguson-Smith, M. A. (2007) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-157 · Cited by 44
Cited by
Aran, D., Looney, A. P., Liu, L., Wu, E., Fong, V., Hsu, A., Chak, S., Naikawadi, R. P., Wolters, P. J., Abate, A. R., et al. (2019) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41590-018-0276-y · Cited by 4,984
Mostafavi, S., Gaiteri, C., Sullivan, S. E., White, C. C., Tasaki, S., Xu, J., Taga, M., Klein, H.-U., Patrick, E., Komashko, V., et al. (2018) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0154-9 · Cited by 509
Genome graphs and the evolution of genome inference
Paten, B., Novak, A. M., Eizenga, J. M., & Garrison, E. (2017) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.214155.116 · Cited by 351
Evolution and Diversity of Transposable Elements in Vertebrate Genomes
Sotero-Caio, C. G., Platt, R. N., Suh, A., & Ray, D. A. (2017) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evw264 · Cited by 283
Davies, B. W., Bogard, R. W., & Mekalanos, J. J. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1107894108 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Pask, A. J., Papenfuss, A. T., Ager, E. I., McColl, K. A., Speed, T. P., & Renfree, M. B.
- Venue
- Genome Biology
- Published
- 2009-01-02
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- R1-R1
- ISSN
- 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-760X
- OpenAlex
- W2121743800
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.