Cited by 44Genetic Syndromes and ImprintingChromosomal and Genetic VariationsGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities

The evolution of imprinting: chromosomal mapping of orthologues of mammalian imprinted domains in monotreme and marsupial mammals

Open access
Edwards, Carol A, Rens, Willem, Clarke, Oliver, Mungall, Andrew J, Hore, Timothy, Graves, Jennifer A Marshall, Dunham, Ian, Ferguson-Smith, Anne C +1 more·2007·BMC Evolutionary Biology

Abstract

Background: The evolution of genomic imprinting, the parental-origin specific expression of genes, is the subject of much debate. There are several theories to account for how the mechanism evolved including the hypothesis that it was driven by the evolution of X-inactivation, or that it arose from an ancestrally imprinted chromosome. Results: Here we demonstrate that mammalian orthologues of imprinted genes are dispersed amongst autosomes in both monotreme and marsupial karyotypes. Conclusion: These data, along with the similar distribution seen in birds, suggest that imprinted genes were not located on an ancestrally imprinted chromosome or associated with a sex chromosome. Our results suggest imprinting evolution was a stepwise, adaptive process, with each gene/cluster independently becoming imprinted as the need arose.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2148-7-157

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Edwards, C. A., Rens, W., Clarke, O., Mungall, A. J., Hore, T., Graves, J. A. M., Dunham, I., Ferguson-Smith, A. C., & Ferguson-Smith, M. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB)
  • Australian National University (AU)
Corresponding author
Ferguson-Smith, Malcolm A
Venue
BMC Evolutionary Biology
Published
2007-09-06
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
157-157
ISSN
1471-2148 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063401689
Cited by
44
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Evolutionary Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
Keywords
genomic imprinting, evolution of imprinting, imprinted genes, imprinted domains, monotremes, marsupials, autosomes, X chromosome inactivation, sex chromosomes, chromosome mapping
MeSH terms
Animals, Chromosome Mapping, Macropodidae, Platypus, DNA Probes, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Genomic Imprinting, Evolution, Molecular, Chromosomes, Artificial, Bacterial, X Chromosome Inactivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review