The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The 1001 Genomes Project for Arabidopsis thaliana
Open accessAbstract
We advocate here a 1001 Genomes project for Arabidopsis thaliana, the workhorse of plant genetics, which will provide an enormous boost for plant research with a modest financial investment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana
Initiative, T. A. G. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35048692 · Cited by 9,301
A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs
The International HapMap Consortium (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06258 · Cited by 4,438
Accurate whole human genome sequencing using reversible terminator chemistry
Bentley, D. R., Balasubramanian, S., Swerdlow, H. P., Smith, G. P., Milton, J., Brown, C. G., Hall, K. P., Evers, D. J., Barnes, C. L., Bignell, H. R., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07517 · Cited by 3,684
Genome-wide association studies for complex traits: consensus, uncertainty and challenges
McCarthy, M. I., Abecasis, G. R., Cardon, L. R., Goldstein, D. B., Little, J., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Hirschhorn, J. N. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2344 · Cited by 2,891
The diploid genome sequence of an Asian individual
Wang, J., Wang, W., Li, R., Li, Y., Tian, G., Goodman, L., Fan, W., Zhang, J., Li, J., Zhang, J., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07484 · Cited by 924 · cited 1×
“Indeed, a 1000 Genomes Project for humans was announced in January 2008 [33], and the first results of this initiative are very encouraging [34,35].”
Background
Cited by
Repetitive DNA and next-generation sequencing: computational challenges and solutions
Treangen, T. J., & Salzberg, S. L. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3117 · Cited by 1,597
Sequencing pools of individuals — mining genome-wide polymorphism data without big funding
Schlötterer, C., Tobler, R., Kofler, R., & Nolte, V. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3803 · Cited by 784
RNAi-mediated crop protection against insects
Price, D. R. G., & Gatehouse, J. A. (2008) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.04.004 · Cited by 585
Crop genomics: advances and applications
Morrell, P. L., Buckler, E. S., & Ross-Ibarra, J. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3097 · Cited by 507
The development of Arabidopsis as a model plant
Koornneef, M., & Meinke, D. (2010) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2009.04086.x · Cited by 489
Metadata
- Authors
- Weigel, D., & Mott, R.
- Venue
- Genome Biology
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 107
- ISSN
- 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039618894
- Cited by
- 492
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 22.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The 1001 Genomes Project for Arabidopsis thaliana. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/gb-2009-10-5-107
- The paper
- Weigel, D., & Mott, R. (2009). The 1001 Genomes Project for Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2009-10-5-107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
