The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk reduction through community-based monitoring: the
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, trust can serve as the cornerstone for developing effective early warning systems for residents.”
From The Role of Trust in Disaster Risk Reduction: A Critical Review (2023) · cites this paper as [39]
In the citing paper
“for example, when individuals receive evacuation recommendations from a trusted source, whether through informal, direct communication channels or official mediums such as national radio or television, they are more inclined to make swift and appropriate decisions [39].”
From The Role of Trust in Disaster Risk Reduction: A Critical Review (2023) · cites this paper as [39]
In the citing paper
“In fact, in uncertain circumstances, high levels of trust between residents and scientists facilitate the direct dissemination of critical information for risk management; specifically, this collaborative relationship between scientists and residents incentivizes community members to undertake risk-reducing actions that are informed via scientific information”
From The Role of Trust in Disaster Risk Reduction: A Critical Review (2023) · cites this paper as [39]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks
Pidgeon, N., & Fischhoff, B. (2011) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1080 · Cited by 680
Revisiting community-based disaster risk management
Maskrey, A. (2011) · Environmental Hazards · doi:10.3763/ehaz.2011.0005 · Cited by 210
Cited by
The Role of Trust in Disaster Risk Reduction: A Critical Review
Bonfanti, R. C., Oberti, B., Ravazzoli, E., Rinaldi, A., Ruggieri, S., & Schimmenti, A. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph21010029 · Cited by 143
Pallister, J., Papale, P., Eichelberger, J., Newhall, C., Mandeville, C., Nakada, S., Marzocchi, W., Loughlin, S., Jolly, G., Ewert, J., et al. (2019) · Journal of Applied Volcanology · doi:10.1186/s13617-019-0082-8 · Cited by 68
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Stone, J., Barclay, J., Simmons, P., Cole, P. D., Loughlin, S. C., Ramón, P., & Mothes, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Volcanology
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11
- ISSN
- 2191-5040
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk reduction through community-based monitoring: the. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/preaccept-3063814861249147
- The paper
- Stone, J., Barclay, J., Simmons, P., Cole, P. D., Loughlin, S. C., Ramón, P., & Mothes, P. (2014). Risk reduction through community-based monitoring: the. Journal of Applied Volcanology. https://doi.org/10.1186/preaccept-3063814861249147
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
