Revisiting community-based disaster risk management
Abstract
This paper examines whether the hypothesis presented in Ocho Rios in 1984 is still valid and relevant. The first part of the paper revisits the central tenets of the 1984 paper. The second part of the paper gives a broad overview of how community-based approaches have been taken up and evolved over the last quarter-century. The third part of the paper examines, with the benefit of hindsight, to what extent the approaches advocated in Ocho Rios are still valid. Finally, the paper examines the role of community-based and local-level approaches looking into the future. The paper is written as a personal reflection, without any pretence to academic rigour and also without systematically surveying the thousands of ongoing community-based or local-level initiatives in disaster risk management, referred to in this paper as community-based disaster risk management and local-level disaster risk management, respectively.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies have pointed out the positive impact on disaster preparedness of formal education, such as in nursery schools, schools and universities, and informal education, such as community-based methods to reduce disaster risks.
“In fact, studies have pointed out the positive impact on disaster preparedness of formal education, such as in nursery schools, schools and universities (Hoffmann and Muttarak 2017), and informal education, such as community-based methods to reduce disaster risks (Allen 2006; Maskrey 2011).”
From Disaster preparedness and resilience at household level in Yangon, Myanmar (2022) · cites this paper as Maskrey 2011
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Disaster preparedness and resilience at household level in Yangon, Myanmar
Heinkel, S.-B., Thiebes, B., Than, Z. M., Aung, T., Kyi, T. T., Mar, W. L., Oo, S. S., Miller, C., Willkomm, M., Maung, W., et al. (2022) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-022-05226-w · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Clark‐Ginsberg, A., Blake, J. S., & Patel, K. V. (2022) · Disasters · doi:10.1111/disa.12466 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
- Authors
- Maskrey, A.
- Affiliations
- United Nations (US)
- Corresponding author
- Maskrey, Andrew
- Venue
- Environmental Hazards
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-03-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 42-52
- ISSN
- 1464-2867 (ISSN-L)
- 1747-7891
- 1878-0059
- OpenAlex
- W1998767726
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 18.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environmental Hazards (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
- Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
- Keywords
- community-based disaster risk management, disaster risk reduction, community participation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review