The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rapid evaluation and quality control of next generation sequencing data with FaQCs
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies that parallelize the sequencing process and produce thousands to millions, or even hundreds of millions of sequences in a single sequencing run, have revolutionized genomic and genetic research. Because of the vagaries of any platform's sequencing chemistry, the experimental processing, machine failure, and so on, the quality of sequencing reads is never perfect, and often declines as the read is extended. These errors invariably affect downstream analysis/application and should therefore be identified early on to mitigate any unforeseen effects. RESULTS: Here we present a novel FastQ Quality Control Software (FaQCs) that can rapidly process large volumes of data, and which improves upon previous solutions to monitor the quality and remove poor quality data from sequencing runs. Both the speed of processing and the memory footprint of storing all required information have been optimized via algorithmic and parallel processing solutions. The trimmed output compared side-by-side with the original data is part of the automated PDF output. We show how this tool can help data analysis by providing a few examples, including an increased percentage of reads recruited to references, improved single nucleotide polymorphism identification as well as de novo sequence assembly metrics. CONCLUSION: FaQCs combines several features of currently available applications into a single, user-friendly process, and includes additional unique capabilities such as filtering the PhiX control sequences, conversion of FASTQ formats, and multi-threading. The original data and trimmed summaries are reported within a variety of graphics and reports, providing a simple way to do data quality control and assurance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A fast, lock-free approach for efficient parallel counting of occurrences of k -mers
Marçais, G., & Kingsford, C. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr011 · Cited by 4,661
SolexaQA: at-a-glance quality assessment of Illumina second-generation sequencing data
Cox, M. P., Peterson, D. A., & Biggs, P. J. (2010) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-485 · Cited by 1,357
Cited by
KAT: a K-mer analysis toolkit to quality control NGS datasets and genome assemblies
Mapleson, D., Garcia Accinelli, G., Kettleborough, G., Wright, J., & Clavijo, B. J. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw663 · Cited by 538
Sugihara, Y., Abe, Y., Takagi, H., Abe, A., Shimizu, M., Ito, K., Kanzaki, E., Oikawa, K., Kourelis, J., Langner, T., et al. (2023) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001945 · Cited by 59
Peng, S., Zheng, H., Herrero-Fresno, A., Olsen, J. E., Dalsgaard, A., & Ding, Z. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148259 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Lo, C.-C., & Chain, P. S. G.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2014-11-19
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 366-366
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2079958213
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rapid evaluation and quality control of next generation sequencing data with FaQCs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12859-014-0366-2
- The paper
- Lo, C.-C., & Chain, P. S. G. (2014). Rapid evaluation and quality control of next generation sequencing data with FaQCs. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-014-0366-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.