Cited by 21Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksData Visualization and AnalyticsGene Regulatory Network Analysis

CellNetVis: a web tool for visualization of biological networks using force-directed layout constrained by cellular components

Open access
Heberle, Henry, Carazzolle, Marcelo Falsarella, Telles, Guilherme P., Meirelles, Gabriela Vaz, Minghim, Rosane·2017·BMC Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The advent of "omics" science has brought new perspectives in contemporary biology through the high-throughput analyses of molecular interactions, providing new clues in protein/gene function and in the organization of biological pathways. Biomolecular interaction networks, or graphs, are simple abstract representations where the components of a cell (e.g. proteins, metabolites etc.) are represented by nodes and their interactions are represented by edges. An appropriate visualization of data is crucial for understanding such networks, since pathways are related to functions that occur in specific regions of the cell. The force-directed layout is an important and widely used technique to draw networks according to their topologies. Placing the networks into cellular compartments helps to quickly identify where network elements are located and, more specifically, concentrated. Currently, only a few tools provide the capability of visually organizing networks by cellular compartments. Most of them cannot handle large and dense networks. Even for small networks with hundreds of nodes the available tools are not able to reposition the network while the user is interacting, limiting the visual exploration capability. RESULTS: Here we propose CellNetVis, a web tool to easily display biological networks in a cell diagram employing a constrained force-directed layout algorithm. The tool is freely available and open-source. It was originally designed for networks generated by the Integrated Interactome System and can be used with networks from others databases, like InnateDB. CONCLUSIONS: CellNetVis has demonstrated to be applicable for dynamic investigation of complex networks over a consistent representation of a cell on the Web, with capabilities not matched elsewhere.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12859-017-1787-5

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies have integrated protein-protein interaction networks with subcellular organization by partitioning a network into subnetworks according to subcellular location.

    “At a larger scale, studies have integrated protein-protein interaction networks with subcellular organization by partitioning a network into subnetworks according to subcellular location (Barsky et al., 2007; Heberle et al., 2017; Nagasaki et al., 2011; Ofran et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2012a).”

    From Mapping the multiscale structure of biological systems (2021) · cites this paper as Heberle et al., 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [17]Schuhmacher A. Software Visualization via Hierarchic Graphs: PhD thesis, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology; 2015. http://i11www.iti.kit.edu/_media/teaching/theses/ma-schuhmacher-15.pdf. Accessed 17 Apr 2017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heberle, H., Carazzolle, M. F., Telles, G. P., Meirelles, G. V., & Minghim, R.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
  • Brazilian Biosciences National Laboratory (BR)
Corresponding author
Minghim, Rosane
Venue
BMC Bioinformatics
Published
2017-09
Volume
18
Issue
S10
Pages
395-395
ISSN
1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2734881787
Cited by
21
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
biological network visualization, force-directed layout, cell compartments, protein-protein interaction network, web visualization tool
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Cells, Humans, Software, User-Computer Interface, Databases, Factual, Internet, MAP Kinase Signaling System, Metabolic Networks and Pathways, Gene Ontology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review